Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science (한국문헌정보학회지)

Korean Society For Library And Information Science (한국문헌정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Centrality Measures for Bibliometric Network Analysis

계량서지적 네트워크 분석을 위한 중심성 척도에 관한 연구

  • Published : 2006.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recently, some bibliometric researchers tried to use the centrality analysis methods and the centrality measures which are standard tools in social network analysis. However the traditional centrality measures originated from social network analysis could not deal with weighted networks such as co-citation networks. In this study. new centrality measures for analyzing bibliometric networks with link weights are suggested and applied to three real network data, including an author co-citation network, a co-word network, and a website co-link network. The results of centrality analyses in these three cases can be regarded as Promising the usefulness of suggested centrality measures, especially in analyzing the Position and influence of each node in a bibliometric network.

최근 일부 계량서지학 연구에서 사회 네트워크 분석 분야의 도구인 중심성 분석 기법을 도입하려는 시도가 나타나고 있다. 그런데 사회 네트워크를 대상으로 개발된 중심성 척도는 노드간 연결에 대한 가중치를 반영하지 않는 단점이 있다 이 연구에서는 가중 네트워크인 계량서지적 자료에 대해서 중심성을 분석할 수 있는 새로운 척도를 네 가지 제시하였다. 제안된 척도의 유용성을 검증하기 위해서 저자동시인용 네트워크. 용어 동시출현 네트워크, 웹사이트 동시링크 네트워크의 세 가지 실제 자료에 대해서 중심성 분석을 수행하였다. 분석 결과에서는 제안된 중심성 척도가 계량서지적 네트워크를 대상으로 개별 노드의 입지와 영향력을 파악하는데 있어서 매우 유용함이 확인되었다

Keywords

References

  1. 유사라. 1991. 네트웍 연구의 사회적 접근과 분석이론. '도서관학', 20: 297-330
  2. 유영준. 2003. 문헌정보학의 지식 구조에 관한 연구. 박사학위논문, 연세대학교 대학원
  3. 이은숙, 정영미. 2002. 복수저자를 고려한 동시인용분석 연구: 정보학과 컴퓨터과학을 대상으로. '지식처리연구', 3(2): 1-26
  4. 이재윤. 2006. 지적 구조의 규명을 위한 네트워크 형성 방식에 관한 연구. '한국문헌정보학회지', 40(2): 333-355
  5. 정동열, 최윤미. 1999. 웹 정보원의 동시인용분석에 관한 실험적 연구. '정보관리학회지', 16(2): 7-25
  6. Bollen, Johan, Herbert Van de Sompel, Joan A. Smith, and Rick Luce. 2005. 'Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data.' Information Processing & Management, 41(6): 1419-1440
  7. Bonacich, P. 1972. 'Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification.' Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2: 113-120
  8. Callon, M., J. P. Courtial, & F. Laville. 1991. 'Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry.' Scientometrics, 22(1): 153-205
  9. Chen, C. 2005. 'The centrality of pivotal points in the evolution of scientific networks.' International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces(IUI 2005), pp. 98-105
  10. Crane, D. 1969. 'Social structure in a group of scientists: A test of the invisible college hypothesis.' American Sociological Review, 34, 335-352
  11. Crane, D. 1972. Invisible Colleges: Discussion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  12. Dastidar, Prabir G. 2004. 'Ocean science & technology research across the countries: A global scenario.' Scientometrics, 59 (1): 15-27
  13. de Nooy, W., A. Mrvar, and V. Batagelj. 2005. Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. Cambridge University Press.
  14. Ding, Y, G. G. Chowdhury, and S. Foo. 2001. 'Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis.' Information Processing & Management, 37(6): 817-842
  15. Doreian, P. 1985. 'A measure of standing of journals in stratified networks.' Scientometrics, 8: 341-363
  16. Doreian, P., and T. J. Fararo. 1985. 'Structural equivalence in a journal network.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(1): 28-37
  17. Dosa, M. 1994. The Health Information Sharing Project(HISP): Summary of Facts. Syracuse. NY: Syracuse University School of Information Studies. Unpublished report. Quoted in Gray et al (1998)
  18. Dosa, M. L. 1982. 'Information transfer in gerontology and health: a centralized and a decentralized model.' Special Collection, 1(3-4): 53-72. Quoted in Gray et al(1998)
  19. Freeman, L. C. 1979. 'Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification.' Social Networks, 1, 215-239
  20. Glnzel, Wolfgang, et al. 2003. - An Analysis Based on Publications and Patents.
  21. Granovetter, Mark. 1973. 'The strength of weak tie.' American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380
  22. Gray, S. A., and R. O'Shea, M. E. Petty, and J. Loonsk. 1998. 'The western New York health resources project: developing access to local health information.' Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 86(3): 335–339
  23. Haythornthwaite, Caroline, 1996. Social network analysis: an approach and technique for the study of information exchange. Library and Information Research, 18: 323-342
  24. Haythornthwaite, Caroline. 2006. 'Learning and knowledge networks in interdisciplinary collaborations.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8): 1079-1092
  25. Hersberger, Julie. 2003. 'A qualitative approach to examining information transfer via social networks among homeless populations.' New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 4(1): 95-108
  26. Knoke, D., and R. S. Burt. 1983. 'Prominence.' In R. S. Burt and M. J. Minor(eds.), Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction, SAGE Publications, pp. 195-222
  27. Liu, X., J. Bollen, M. L. Nelson, and H. Van de Sompel. 2005. 'Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community.' Information Processing & Management, 41(6): 1462-1480
  28. Marion, L. S., E. Garfield, L. L. Hargens, and L. A. Lievrouw. 2003. 'Social network analysis and citation network analysis: complementary approaches to the study of scientific communication.' Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 40(1): 486-487
  29. Nagpaul, P. S. 2002. 'Visualizing cooperation networks of elite institutions in India.' Scientometrics, 54(2): 213-228
  30. National Library of Medicine. 1978. Development and Evaluation of Health Information Sharing. NY: Syracuse University School of Information Studies. Unpublished report. 유사라(1991)에서 재인용
  31. Newman, M. E. J. 2004a. 'Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration.' Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101: 5200-5205
  32. Newman, M. E. J. 2004b. 'Analysis of weighted networks.' Physical Review E, 70, 056131
  33. Otte, E., and R. Rousseau. 2002. 'Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences.' Journal of Information Science, 28(6): 441-454
  34. Page, L., S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. 1998. The Pagerank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web. Technical report, Stanford University Database Group. Available at
  35. Price, D. J. de Solla. 1963. Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.
  36. Schubert, Andras. 2002. 'The web of scientometrics.' Scientometrics, 53(1): 3-20
  37. Schvaneveldt, R. W.(ed). 1990. Pathfinder Associative Networks: Studies in Knowledge Organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  38. Scott, J. P. 2000. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London: SAGE Publications
  39. Sonnenwald, Diane H., and Linda G. Pierce. 2000. 'Information behavior in dynamic group work contexts: interwoven situational awareness, dense social networks and contested collaboration in command and control.' Information Processing & Management, 36(3): 461-479
  40. White, H. D., and B. C. Griffith. 1981. 'Author cocitation: a literature measure of intellectual structure.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32: 163-171
  41. Yoshikane, F., and K. Kageura. 2004. 'Comparative analysis of coauthorship networks of different domains: the growth and change of networks.' Scientometrics, 60(3): 435-446
  42. Zuccala, Alesia. 2006. 'Modeling the invisible college.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2): 152-168

Cited by

  1. An Analytical Study on Research Trends of Digital Curation: Focused on Library and Information Science vol.32, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.1.265
  2. A Comparative Study on the Centrality Measures for Analyzing Research Collaboration Networks vol.31, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.3.153
  3. Journal Co-citation Analysis for Library Services in Pharmaceutics vol.43, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2012.43.1.159
  4. Research Trend Analysis Using Bibliographic Information and Citations of Cloud Computing Articles: Application of Social Network Analysis vol.20, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.13088/jiis.2014.20.1.195
  5. A Bibliometric Analysis on Twitter Research vol.31, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.3.293
  6. A Study on Opinion Mining of Newspaper Texts based on Topic Modeling vol.47, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.4.315
  7. Profiling and Co-word Analysis of Teaching Korean as a Foreign Language Domain vol.30, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.195
  8. Examining the Intellectual Structure of a Medical Informatics Journal with Author Co-citation Analysis and Co-word Analysis vol.30, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.2.207
  9. A Study on the Intellectual Structure of Library and Information Science in Korea by Author Bibliographic Coupling Analysis vol.30, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.031
  10. The Distinct Impact Dimensions of the Prestige Indices in Author Citation Networks vol.33, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.2.061
  11. A Comparison Study on the Weighted Network Centrality Measures of tnet and WNET vol.30, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.241
  12. Collaboration Networks and Document Networks in Informetrics Research from 2001 to 2011: Finding Influential Nations, Institutions, Documents vol.30, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.1.179
  13. Intellectual Structure and Infrastructure of Informetrics: Domain Analysis from 2001 to 2010 vol.28, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.2.011
  14. Domain Analysis on Electrical Engineering in Korea by Author Bibliographic Coupling Analysis vol.42, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2011.42.4.075
  15. Examining on the Relationship Between Interdisciplinarity and Research Impact with Analyzing the Journals of Library and Information Science Field vol.30, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.007
  16. Examining the Intellectual Structure of Reading Studies with Co-Word Analysis Based on the Importance of Journals and Sequence of Keywords vol.25, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.1.295
  17. Subject analysis of LIS data archived in a Figshare using co-occurrence analysis pp.1468-4527, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-12-2017-0369