Performance of R290 and R1270 as Alternative Refrigerants of R22 According to Temperature Variations of Evaporator and Condenser

증발기와 응축기 온도변화에 따른 R22 대체냉매 R290 및 R1270의 성능평가

  • 백인철 (인하대학교 대학원 기계공학과) ;
  • 박기정 (인하대학교 대학원 기계공학과) ;
  • 심윤보 (인하대학교 대학원 기계공학과) ;
  • 정동수 (인하대학교 기계공학과)
  • Published : 2006.10.01

Abstract

In this study, performance of 2 pure hydrocarbons R290 and R1270 was measured in an attempt to substitute R22 under 3 different temperature conditions. They were tested in a refrigerating bench tester with a hermetic rotary compressor. The test bench provided about 3.5 kW capacity and water and water/glycol mixture were employed as the secondary heat transfer fluids. All tests were conducted under the same external conditions resulting in the average saturation temperatures of $7/45^{\circ}C$ and $-7/41^{\circ}C$ and $-21/28^{\circ}C$ in the evaporator and condenser, respectively. Test results show that the coefficient of performance (COP) of these refrigerants is up to 11.54% higher than that of R22 in all temperature conditions. Compressor discharge temperatures were reduced by $14{\sim}31^{\circ}C$ with these fluids. There was no problem with mineral oil since the mixtures were mainly composed of hydrocarbons. The amount of charge was reduced up to 58% as compared to R22. Overall, these fluids provide good performance with reasonable energy savings without any environmental problem and thus can be used as long term alternatives for residential air-conditioning and heat pumping application.

Keywords

References

  1. Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer, 1989, Final Act, United Nations Environment Programme
  2. Jung, D., Song, Y. and Park, B., 2000, Performance of alternative refrigerant mixtures, Int. J. Refrigeration, Vol. 23, No.6, pp.466-474 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-7007(99)00066-3
  3. Calm, J. M. and Domanski, P. A, 2004, R-22 replacement status, ASHRAE Journal, August, pp.29-39
  4. Domanski, P. A. and Didion, D. A., 1993, Thermodynamic evaluation of H-22 alternative refrigerants and refrigerant mixtures, ASHHAE Transactions, Vol. 99, Part 2, pp. 636-648
  5. Global Environmental Change Report, 1997, A brief analysis of the Kyoto protocol, Vol. IX, No. 24, December
  6. Cox, N., 2004, Energy comparison of a ground source heat pump using hydrocarbon refrigerants, Prod. of the 6th IIR Gustav Lorentzen Natural Working Fluids Conference, Glasgow, UK
  7. Kruse, H., 1996, The stilts of the art of the hydrocarbon technology in household refrigeration, Proc. of the Int. Conferences on Ozone Protection Technologies, Washington, DC, pp. 179-188
  8. Jung, D., Song, Y. and Park, B., 2000, Testing of propane/isobutane mixture in domestic refrigerators, Int. J. Refrigeration, Vol. 23, No.7, pp.517-527 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-7007(99)00084-5
  9. Granryd, E., 2001, Hydrocarbons as refrigerants-an overview, Int. J. Refrigeration, Vol. 24, pp. 15-24 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-7007(00)00065-7
  10. Primal, WDF., Palm, B. and Lundqvist, P., 2004, Propane heat pump with low refrigerant charge: Design and laboratory tests, Int. J. Refrigeration, Vol. 27, No.7, pp.761-773 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2004.06.012
  11. Mulroy, W., Kauffeld, M., McLinden, M. O., and Didion, D. A., 1988, Experimental evaluation of two refrigerant mixtures in a bread-board air conditioner, Proc. of Int. Inst. Refrigeration, Purdue Conference on CFCs, Commissions B1, B2, E1& E2, pp, 27-34
  12. Maclaine-cross, I. L. and Leonardi, E., 1997, Why hydrocarbons save energy?, Australian AIRAH Journal, Vol. 51, pp.33-37