DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Kinematic Analysis of Morote-Seoinage(two-handed shoulder throw) According to the Kumi-kata Types in Judo[ I ]

유도 맞잡기 유형에 따른 양손업어치기의 동작의 운동학적 분석[ I ]

  • Published : 2006.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze exercise related mechanical variables according to performance levels and Kumi-kata types in elite judo players (G1) and non-elite judo players, namely university players (G2). To achieve this purpose, three players in G1 whose main special skill was Morote-Seoinage and three university judo players(G2) was selected as comparative group. Then they were examined for distinguishing A and B types of Kumi-kata. Analyzed variables were the time required to show skills, knee degree, elbow degree. After analysing this study, conclusions were derived as follows. 1. In total necessary time of showing skills according to group of Kumi-kata type, G2 was longer than G1 in both A type (20.9%) and B type (23.7%). In necessary time of phase, in only 3P, G1 was shorter than G2 in A type (50%) and B type (75%). There was no difference in time required of 1P and 2P according to Kumi-kata type of group and in only 3P, B type was shorter than A type in both B type (75%) of G1 and B type (50%) of G2 2 There was no difference in elbow degree of offensive arm according to group of Kumi-kata type, however in A and B types, G1 could use skills by extending in kake phase, but G2 could use skills by bending. Elbow degree of offensive arm according to Kumi-kata type of group showed difference in E1. and F2 of G1. A and B types of G1 extended elbow degree in Kake phase, but G2 bent elbow degree so exercise program which could movable range extensively in Kake phase is needed.

Keywords

References

  1. 권문석 (2002) 유도 맞잡기 타입에 따른 허벅다리걸기의 운동학적 분석. 미간행 석사학위논문, 용인대학교 일반대학원.
  2. 김의환 (1988a). 유도 외기시 업어치기의 생체역학적 분석. 스포츠과학정보, 2, 1-20
  3. 김의환 (1995b). 1995년 제18회 하계 유니버시아드대회 유도경기 조사연구원 참가보고서. 서울: 한국체육과학연구원, 14-15
  4. 김의환 (1997). 유도 한팔업어치기의 역학적 특성분석 사례연구. 용인대학교 무도연구소지, 8, 용인대학교 무도연구소
  5. 김의환 (2001). 유도 우수선수 업어치기의 3차원 역학적 특성 프로화일. 한국운동역학회지, 10(2), 115-138.
  6. 김의환 (2002). 유도과학교실. 62호 pp.58, 서울: 대한유도회
  7. 김의환, 윤현 (2002). 유도 양팔업어치기 패턴에 따른 공격팔 기울이기 동작의 운동학적 분석. 한국운동역학회지, 13(1), 73-94. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2003.13.1.073
  8. 박장렬 (1998). 유도 경기의 체급별 기술사용에 대한 비교연구. 미간행 석사학위논문. 동국대학교 교육대학원
  9. 박진수 (1987). 유도 경기의 체급별 사용기술에 관한 조사 연구. 미간행 석사학위논문. 동국대학교 교육대학원.
  10. 윤남식 (1991). Biomechanics의 기초. 서울: 교학출판사, pp. 19.
  11. 윤용발 (1989). 유도 기술 중 업어치기에 대한 운동학적 분석. 미간행석사학위논문, 성균관대학교 교육대학원.
  12. 이현수 (1993). 유도선수들의 체급별 기술사용 빈도에 관한 조사연구. 미간행 석사학위논문, 전주우석대학교 교육대학원.
  13. Harter & Bates (1984). Kinematic and Temporal Characteristics of selected Judo Hip Throws. Biomechanics in Sports III. pp.141-150.
  14. IJF (1992). Composition of judo techniques. International Judo Federation.
  15. Kwon, Y. H (2001). KWON3D Motion Analysis Package Version 3.1 Seoul: Visol Corp.
  16. Plagenhoef, S., Evans, F. G, & Abdelnour, T. (1983). Anatomical data for analyzing human motion Research quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 54(2), 169-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1983.10605290

Cited by

  1. A Biomechanical Analysis of Judo's Kuzushi(balance-breaking) Motion vol.17, pp.2, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2007.17.2.207