DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A MULTISCALE MORTAR MIXED FINITE ELEMENT METHOD FOR SLIGHTLY COMPRESSIBLE FLOWS IN POROUS MEDIA

  • Kim, Mi-Young (Department of Mathematics Inha University) ;
  • Park, Eun-Jae (Department of Mathematics Yonsei University) ;
  • Thomas, Sunil G. (Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences the University of Texas at Austin) ;
  • Wheeler, Mary F. (Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences Department of Aerospace Engineering Mechanics and Department of Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering the University of Texas at Austin)
  • Published : 2007.09.30

Abstract

We consider multiscale mortar mixed finite element discretizations for slightly compressible Darcy flows in porous media. This paper is an extension of the formulation introduced by Arbogast et al. for the incompressible problem [2]. In this method, flux continuity is imposed via a mortar finite element space on a coarse grid scale, while the equations in the coarse elements (or subdomains) are discretized on a fine grid scale. Optimal fine scale convergence is obtained by an appropriate choice of mortar grid and polynomial degree of approximation. Parallel numerical simulations on some multiscale benchmark problems are given to show the efficiency and effectiveness of the method.

Keywords

References

  1. T. Arbogast, L. C. Cowsar, M. F. Wheeler, and I. Yotov, Mixed finite element methods on nonmatching multiblock grids, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 37 (2000), no. 4, 1295-1315 https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036142996308447
  2. T. Arbogast, G. Pencheva, M. F. Wheeler, and I. Yotov, A multiscale mortar mixed finite element method, Technical Report TR-MATH 06-15, Department of Mathematics, University of Pittsburgh, 2006, Submitted to Multiscale Model. Simul
  3. J. Bear, Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media, Dover Publication, Inc. New York, 1988
  4. C. Bernardi, Y. Maday, and A. T. Patera, A new nonconforming approach. to domain decomposition: the mortar element method, Nonlinear partial differential equations and their applications. College de France Seminar, Vol. XI (Paris, 1989-1991), 13-51, Pitman Res. Notes Math. Ser., 299, Longman Sci. Tech., Harlow, 1994
  5. F. Brezzi, J. Douglas, Jr., M. Fortin, and L. D. Marini, Efficient rectangular mixed finite elements in two and three space variables, RAIRO Model. Math. Anal. Numer. 21 (1987), no. 4, 581-604
  6. F. Brezzi, J. Douglas, Jr., and L. D. Marini, Two families of mixed finite elements for second order elliptic problems, Numer. Math. 47 (1985), no. 2, 217-235 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01389710
  7. F. Brezzi and M. Fortin, Mixed and hybrid finite element methods, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, 15. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991
  8. Z. Chen and T. Y. Hou, A mixed multiscale finite element method for elliptic problems with oscillating coefficients, Math. Comp. 72 (2003), no. 242, 541-576 https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-02-01441-2
  9. M. A. Christie and M. J. Blunt, Tenth SPE comparative solution project: A comparison of upscaling techniques, SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 4 (2001), no. 4, 308-317 https://doi.org/10.2118/72469-PA
  10. L. C. Cowsar, J. Mandel, and M. F. Wheeler, Balancing domain decomposition for mixed finite elements, Math. Comp. 64 (1995), no. 211, 989-1015 https://doi.org/10.2307/2153480
  11. J. Douglas, Jr., R. E. Ewing, and M. F. Wheeler, The approxuruituni of the pressure by a mixed method in the simulation of miscible displacement, RAIRO Anal. Numer. 17 (1983), no. 1, 17-33
  12. J. Douglas, Jr. and J. E. Roberts, Global estimates for mixed methods for second order elliptic equations, Math. Comp. 44 (1985), no. 169, 39-52 https://doi.org/10.2307/2007791
  13. R. Duran, Superconuerqence for rectangular mixed finite elements, Numer. Math. 58 (1990), no. 3, 287-298 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01385626
  14. R. E. Ewing, R. D. Lazarov, and J. Wang, Superconvergence of the velocity along the Gauss lines in mixed finite element methods, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 28 (1991), no. 4, 1015-1029 https://doi.org/10.1137/0728054
  15. R. Glowinski and M. F. Wheeler, Domain decomposition and mixed finite element methods for elliptic problems, First International Symposium on Domain Decomposition Methods for Partial Differential Equations (Paris, 1987), 144-172, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA,1988
  16. P. Grisvard, Elliptic problems in nonsmooth domains, Monographs and Studies in Mathematics, 24. Pitman (Advanced Publishing Program), Boston, MA, 1985
  17. M.-Y. Kim, F. A. Milner, and E.-J. Park, Some observations on mixed methods for fully nonlinear parabolic problems in divergence form, Appl. Math. Lett. 9 (1996), no. 1, 75-81
  18. V. Kippe, J. E. Aarnes, and K.-A. Lie, Multiscale finite-element methods for elliptic problems in Porous media flow, Multiscale Model. Simul., (2006, to appear)
  19. T. P. Mathew, Domain decomposition and iterative refinement methods for mixed finite element discretizations of elliptic problems, PhD thesis, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, 1989
  20. F. A. Milner and E.-J. Park, A mixed finite element method for a strongly nonlinear second-order elliptic problem, Math. Comp. 64 (1995), no. 211, 973-988 https://doi.org/10.2307/2153479
  21. M. Nakata, A. Weiser, and M. F. Wheeler, Some superconvergence results for mixed finite element methods for elliptic problems on rectangular domains, The mathematics of finite elements and applications, V (Uxbridge, 1984), 367-389, Academic Press, London, 1985
  22. J. C. Nedelec, Mixed finite elements in $R^3$, Numer. Math. 35 (1980), no. 3, 315-341 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01396415
  23. E.-J. Park, Mixed finite element methods for nonlinear second-order elliptic problems, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 32 (1995), no. 3, 865-885 https://doi.org/10.1137/0732040
  24. E.-J. Park, Mixed finite element methods for generalized Forchheimer flow in porous media, Numer. Methods Partial Differential Equations 21 (2005), no. 2, 213-228 https://doi.org/10.1002/num.20035
  25. P. A. Raviart and J. M. Thomas, A mixed finite element method for 2nd order elliptic problems, Mathematical aspects of finite element methods (Proc. Conf., Consiglio Naz. delle Ricerche (C.N.R.), Rome, 1975), pp. 292-315. Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 606, Springer, Berlin, 1977 https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0064470
  26. J. E. Roberts and J. M. Thomas, Mixed and hybrid methods, Handbook of numerical analysis, Vol. II, 523-639, Handb. Numer. Anal., II, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991
  27. T. Russell and M. F. Wheeler, Finite element and finite difference methods for continuous flows in porous media in The Mathematics of Reservoir Simulation, R. E. Ewing, ed., Frontiers in Applied Mathematics 1, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 1984, pp. 35-106
  28. L. R. Scott and S. Zhang, Finite element interpolation of nonsmooth functions satisfying boundary conditions, Math. Comp. 54 (1990), no. 190,483-493 https://doi.org/10.2307/2008497
  29. A. Weiser and M. F. Wheeler, On convergence of block-centered finite differences for elliptic problems, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 25 (1988), no. 2, 351-375 https://doi.org/10.1137/0725025
  30. M. F. Wheeler, A priori $L_2$ error estimates for Galerkin approximations to parabolic partial differential equations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 10 (1973), 723-759 https://doi.org/10.1137/0710062
  31. M. F. Wheeler and I. Yotov, A posteriori error estimates for the mortar mixed finite element method, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 43 (2005), no. 3, 1021-1042 https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036142903431687
  32. I. Yotov, Mixed finite element methods for flow in porous media, PhD thesis, Rice University, Houston, Texas, 1996, TR96-09, Dept. Compo Appl, Math., Rice University and TICAM report 96-23, University of Texas at Austin

Cited by

  1. Model coupling for multiphase flow in porous media vol.51, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.07.003
  2. Coupling discontinuous Galerkin discretizations using mortar finite elements for advection–diffusion–reaction problems vol.67, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2013.11.002
  3. High-order discontinuous Galerkin methods with Lagrange multiplier for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws vol.73, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2017.02.039
  4. TWO-SCALE PRODUCT APPROXIMATION FOR SEMILINEAR PARABOLIC PROBLEMS IN MIXED METHODS vol.51, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4134/JKMS.2014.51.2.267
  5. Stochastic collocation and mixed finite elements for flow in porous media vol.197, pp.43-44, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2008.03.025
  6. A discontinuous Galerkin method with Lagrange multiplier for hyperbolic conservation laws with boundary conditions vol.70, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2015.05.003
  7. Mortar formulation for a class of staggered discontinuous Galerkin methods vol.71, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2016.02.035
  8. COUPLING MULTIPHASE PORE-SCALE MODELS TO ACCOUNT FOR BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: APPLICATION TO 2D QUASI-STATIC PORE NETWORKS vol.03, pp.03, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1142/S1756973711000431
  9. Space-Time Adaptive Methods for the Mixed Formulation of a Linear Parabolic Problem 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-017-0514-8