Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society (한국지반공학회논문집)

Korean Geotechnical Society (한국지반공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Los Angeles Abrasion Test for Estimating Engineering Index on the Sedimentary Rocks of Kyeongsang Basin

퇴적암의 공학지수를 추정하기 위한 L. A. 마모율 시험

  • 민덕기 (울산대학교 공학대학 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 문종규 (동명기술공단(주)) ;
  • 이상일 (한국농촌공사 울산지사)
  • Published : 2007.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Los Angeles abrasion loss test has usally been applied to the quarry for the purpose of aggregate hardness estimation. 324 blocks from 25 sites of Kyeongsang basin samples of sedimentary rock were examined and tested in laboratary. This paper found that L. A. abrasion loss test is a good method to estimate engineering index such as uniaxial compressive strength, elastic modulus, indirect tensile strength, point load strength index, Schmidt hammer rebound value of sedimentary rocks with high correlation factor. Engineers will prefer L. A. abrasion loss test to the other one for design and construction as this method is quick and easy.

L. A. 마모율 시험은 건설용 골재의 강도를 확인하기 위한 방법으로 주로 석산의 모암을 대상으로 시행하여 왔다. 본 연구는 경상분지 퇴적암이 집중 분포되어 있는 25 지점에서 지질학적 특성을 대표할 수 있는 324 브록의 시료를 채취하여 L. A. 마모율시험으로 각종 공학지수(일축 압축강도, 압열 인장강도, 탄성계수, 점하중 강도지수, Schmidt 해머 반발지수)를 추정하기 위한 실험을 시행하여 회귀 분석법으로 서로간의 상관성을 확인한 결과, 상호간 좋은 상관관계가 있음을 확인하였다. 이 방법이 다른 공학지수를 추정함에 손색이 없으므로 이후에도 많은 활용이 있기를 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 민덕기, 문종규 (2006a),'울산지역 퇴적암의 강도 추정법 연구' 한국지반공학회 논문집,제22권,8호 pp.63-75
  2. 민덕기,문종규 (2006b),'Schmidt hammer 반발지수로 울산지역 퇴적암의 공학적 특성을 추정하기 위한 연구' 한국지반공학회 논문집,제22권, 10호,pp.139-150
  3. KS F (2508-1997),'로스앤젤레스 시험기에 의한 굵은 골재의 마모 시험 방법'
  4. ASTM (C 131-69), 'Standard test method for resistance to degradation of small-size coarse aggragate by abrasion and impact in the Los Angeles machine', Annual Book of ASTM Standards 2005
  5. ASTM (C 535-89), 'Standard test method for resistance to degradation of large-size coarse aggragate by abrasion and impact in the Los Angeles machine', Annual Book of ASTM Standards 2005
  6. ASTM (D 2938-95), 'Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Intact Rock Core Specimensw', Annual Book of ASTM Standards 2005
  7. ASTM (D 3967-95a), 'Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Intact Rock Core Specimens', Annual Book of ASTM Standards 2005
  8. ASTM (D 5731-95), 'Standard test method for determination of the point load strength index of rock'
  9. ASTM (D 5873-00), 'Test method for determination of rock hardness by rebound hanuner method', Annual Book of ASTM Standards 2005
  10. Cargill, J. S. and Shakoor, A., (1990), 'Evaluation of empirical methods for measuring the uniaxial compressive strength of rock', Int. J. Rock Mech, & Min. Sci. & Geomech., Vol.27, pp.495-503 https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(90)91001-N
  11. Gunsallus, K. L. and Kulhawy, F. H. (1984), 'A comparative evaluation of rocks strength measurement' Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr, Vol.21, pp.223-248
  12. ISRM (1985), 'Suggested method for determining point load strength', Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr., Vol.22, pp.53-60 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1985.tb00242.x
  13. ISRM (1979), 'Suggested methods for determining the uniaxial compressive strength and deformability of rock materials', Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr., Vol.16(2), pp.135-140
  14. ISRM (1978), 'Suggested methods for determining indirect tensile strength by the Brazil test'. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., Vol.15, pp.99-103 https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(78)90003-7
  15. ISRM (1978b), 'Suggested methods for determining the resistance to abrasion of aggregate by use of the Los Angeles machine', Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr., Vol.15, pp.89-97
  16. ISRM (1979), 'Suggested methods for determining water content, porosity, density, absorption and related properties and swelling and slake-durability index properties', Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr., Vol.16, pp.141-156
  17. ISRM (1981b), 'Suggested methods for determining hardness and abrasiveness of rocks, Part 3, Commission on standardisation of laboratory and field tests, pp.101-102
  18. Kazi, A., Al-Masour, Z. R., (1980a), 'Empirical relationship between Los Angeles abrasion and Schmidt hammer strength tests with application to aggregate around Jeddah', Q. J. Eng. Geol., Vol.13, pp.45-52 https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.QJEG.1980.013.01.03
  19. Kazi, A., Al-Masour, Z. R., (1980), 'Influence of geological factors on abrasion and soundness characteristics of aggregates', Eng. Geol., Vol.15, pp.195-203 https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(80)90034-4
  20. Kahraman S., Fener M. and Gunaydin O. (2004), 'Prediction the sawability of carbonate rocks using multiple curvilinear regression analysis' Rock Mech. Min. Sci., Vo1.41, pp.1123-1131 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.04.009
  21. Kasim M., Shakoor A.(1996), 'An investigation of the relationship between uniaxial compressive strength and degradation for selected rock types.' Eng. Geol., Vo1.44, pp.213-227 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(96)00073-7
  22. Kowalski W.C. (1966), 'The independence between the strength and voids ratio of limestone and marls in connection with their water saturating and anisotropy.' Proc. 1st. Congr. Int. Soc. Rock Mech., Lisbon, Portugal. pp.143-144
  23. Pettijohn, F. J., Potter, P. E. and Siever, R., 'Sand and sandstone' Springer-Verlag, New York, pp.237-238
  24. Rzhevski V. and Novik G. (1971), 'The Physics of Rocks', Moscow, Mir Publishers, pp.320
  25. Shakoor, A., Brown, C. L., (1996), 'Development of quantitative relationship between unconfined compressive strength and Los Angeles abrasion loss for carbonate rocks', Bull. Int. Ass. Eng. Geol., No.53, pp.97-103
  26. Smorodinov M.I., Motovilov E.A. and Volkov V.A. (1970), 'Determination of correlation relationships between strength and some physical characteristics of rocks.' Proc. 2nd. Congr. Int. Soc. Rock Mech., Vol.2, Belgrade, pp.35-37
  27. Szlavin J. (1974), 'Relationships between some physical proterties of rock determined by laboratory tests,' Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr., Vol. 11 , pp.57-66