Information Systems Review (경영정보학연구)

The Korea Society of Management Information Systems (한국경영정보학회)
권호 표지

Analysing Decision Making Factors of IT Investment Projects

IT 프로젝트의 기본속성과 사전타당성 분석결과가 투자의사결정에 미치는 영향요인

  • Koo, Bon-Jae (Konkuk University, College of Business Administration & Samil PwC Consulting) ;
  • Lee, Kuk-Hie (Konkuk University, College of Business Administration)
  • 구본재 (건국대학교 경영대학, 삼일PwC 컨설팅) ;
  • 이국희 (건국대학교 경영대학 경영정보학과)
  • Published : 2007.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purposes of this dissertation are to identify various factors affecting the outcomes of feasibility analysis and investment decision makings of new IT project plans and empirically analysis the relationships among them. 9 variables which have been drawn from prior studies and industry practices are the amount of the necessary resource such as development budget and time, the expect financial benefits, the degree of alignments between IT projects and the business strategy, the estimated risk, and the investment priority as the dependent variable. Data from 125 IT projects of K bank, the leading commercial bank in Korea, have been collected and Regression Analysis and ANOVA have been performed. As results, 5 out of 8 hypothesis have been accepted partially or totally.

본 연구는 한 기업의 IT자원 및 전략 환경하에서 IT프로젝트의 사전타당성 분석과 투자의사결정 과정에서 작용하는 제반 변수를 파악하고, 변수들 사이의 상관관계와 IT투자의사결정에 미치는 영향을 실증적으로 검증하는데 그 목적이 있다. 기존 관련 연구와 국내외 산업현장 실태를 분석하여 IT투자의사결정에 관련된 9개 변수를 도출하고, 변수들 사이의 인과관계에 관한 12개 가설을 검증하였다. 그 중 재무적 기대효과와 사업전략과의 부합성, 리스크, 경쟁업체 및 외부의 보급상태, 프로젝트 추진 방식이 투자우선순위에 영향을 미친다고 판명되었으며, 프로젝트 추진방식과 신규여부의 차이에 따라 사전타당성 분석결과에 중요한 영향을 미치는 점을 확인하였다. 본 연구는 대부분 주관적 판단에 의해 이루어지는 IT투자에 관한 영향요인을 통계적 분석을 통해 가시화하여 IT의사결정 모델을 구성 하기위한 새로운 이론적 틀을 제공하였을 뿐 아니라 실무에 있어서도 주요 관리자들에게 IT투자의사결정 시 고려해야할 주요 요인들을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 한국전산원, 국가정보화백서, 2003
  2. 이국희, 'IT프로젝트 규모와 유형에 따른 IT투자의사결정 기준의 차이', Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management, 제12권, 제1호, 2005, pp. 191-211
  3. 이국희, '기업정보화 평가모형에 관한 연구', 경영정보학연구, 제2권, 제1호, 1992, 6월, pp. 17-33
  4. 이국희, 구본재, 'IT프로젝트 유형고 오너쉽이 IT 가치평가에 미치는 영향', Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management, 제9권, 제3호, 2002, pp.79-95
  5. 한국전산원, 공공기관 정보화사업 발주 및 관리 프로세스 모델, 2003
  6. 한국개발연구원(KDI), 국가환경종합정보시스템구축사업, 2004
  7. KRG, IT솔루션 시장동향, 2004
  8. Amir .M., and F. Leon, 'Establishing Project Control: schedule, cost and quality', Sam Advanced Management Journal, autumn 1999
  9. Barki, H., S. Rivard, and J. Talbot, 'Toward an assessment of software development risk', Journal of management Information Systems, Vol.10, No.2, Fall 1993, pp. 203-225 https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1993.11518006
  10. Barki, H., S. Rivard, and J. Talbot, 'An integrative contingency model of software project risk management', Journal of management Information Systems, Vol.17, No.4, Spring 2001, pp. 37-69 https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045666
  11. Barua, A., C. H. Kriebel, and T. Mukhopadhyay, 'Information technologies and business value: An analytic and empirical investigationv', Information Systems Research, Vol.6, No.1, March 1995, pp. 3-23 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.1.3
  12. Bouchard, L., 'Decision criteria in the adoption of EDI,' Proceeding of the Four teenth International conference on Information Systems, 1993, pp. 365-376
  13. Boehm, B., 'Software risk management: principles and practices', IEEE software, Vol.8, No.1, January 1991, pp. 32-41 https://doi.org/10.1109/52.62930
  14. Bon, G. L., The crowd: A study of popular mind, Ernest Bonn, Ltd., 1947
  15. Bouchard, T. J, 'whatever happened to brainstorming?', Journal of Creative Behavior, 1971, pp. 182-189(Bannister and Remenyi, 2000)
  16. Bogozzi, R and P.Warshaw, 'Trying to consume', Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.17, No.2, 1990, pp. 127-140 https://doi.org/10.1086/208543
  17. Ballantine et al., 'The 3-D model of information systems success: The search for the dependent variable continues', Information Resources Management Journal, Fall, Vol.9, No.4, 1996, pp. 5-14
  18. Brynjolfsson, E., 'The contribution of information technology to consumer welfare', Information Systems Research, Vol.7, No.3, September, 1996, pp. 281-300 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.3.281
  19. Bannister, F and D. Remenyi, 'Value proposition in IT investment decisions', The Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, Vol.4, No.1, 1999
  20. Brynjolfsson, E., 'The productivity paradox of information technology', Communications of the ACM, Vol.36, No.12, December 1993, pp. 67-77 https://doi.org/10.1145/153571.163272
  21. Brown, R.H., and A. Young, 'Scenarios for the futrure of outsourcing', GartnerGrooup, 2000
  22. Cohen, M., March, T., and Olsen, J, 'A garbage can model of organizational choice', Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.17, No.1, 1972, pp. 1-25 https://doi.org/10.2307/2392088
  23. David, F.D., 'Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology', MIS Quarterly, Vol.7, No.3, 1997
  24. David, J.S., S. David., and R. S. Louis., 'Managing your IT total cost of ownership', Communication of The ACM, Vol.45, No.1, 2002. pp. 101-106 https://doi.org/10.1145/502269.502273
  25. DeLone, W.H., and E.R. McLean, 'Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable', Information Systems Research, Vol.3, No.1, March, 1992, pp. 60-95 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
  26. Downing, T., 'Eight new ways to evaluation automation', Mechanical Engineering, July, 1989
  27. Dedrick, J., Gurbaxani, V., and Kraener, K.L., 'Information technology and economic performance: aritical review of the empirical evidence', ACM Computing Survey, Vol.35, NO.1, 2003, pp. 1-28 https://doi.org/10.1145/641865.641866
  28. Dos Santos, B. L., 'Justifying investments in new information technologies', Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.7, No.4, Spring, 1991. pp. 71-90 https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1991.11517904
  29. Erickson, J., 'The total economic impacts of network appliance's solution relating to business continuance', Giga Information Group Whitepaper, 2002
  30. GartnerGroup, gartnerweb.com/publish/static/aboutgg/pressrel/pr200001120b.html, November 20, 2000
  31. GAO, A framework for assessing and improving process maturity, 2000
  32. Goldman. C., 'Total economic impact business case study', GIGA Information Group; September, 2002
  33. Goodhue, D.L., 'Development and measurement validity of a Task Technology Fit instrument for user evaluations of information systems', Decision Sciences, Vol.29, 1998
  34. Gurbaxani, G. V., and K. L. Kraemer, 'A process oriented framework for assessing the business value of information technology', The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, Vol.27, No.2, Spring 1996, pp. 68-81 https://doi.org/10.1145/243350.243363
  35. Gurbaxani, V., 'Diffusion in computing networks: The case of BITNET,' Communications of the ACM, Vol. 33, 1990, pp. 65-75
  36. Hilliam C.E., and H.M. Edward, 'A case study approach to evaluation of information technology/information systems investment evaluation processes within SMEs', The Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, Vol.4, 2000
  37. Hitt, L.M. and E. Brynjolfsson, 'Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: three different mearsures of information technology value', MIS Quarterly, June 1996, pp. 121-142
  38. Hubbard, D., 'The IT measurement inversion: are your IT investment decisions based on the right information?', CIO Magazine, April 1999
  39. Irani, Z. and Love. P, 'Developing a frame of reference for ex ante IT/IS investment evaluation', European Journal of Information System, Vol.11, 2002, pp. 74-82 https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave/ejis/3000411
  40. Johnson, P.E., Graziolo, K. J and Zualkeman, I. A., 'Success and failure in expert reasoning', Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, November 1992, pp. 173-203
  41. Jackson, C.M., S. Show and R.A. Leitch, 'Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system', Decision Sciences, Vol.28, No.2, 1997, pp. 357-389 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01315.x
  42. Jamieson, L. and F. Bass, 'Adjusting stated intention measures to predict trial purchase of new products: A comparion of models and methods', Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.24, 1989, pp. 336-345
  43. Janis, I.L., Victims of groupthink, 1972, p. 9
  44. Janis, I.L., Crucial Decisions: Leadership in policymaking and crisis management, New York Free Press, 1989
  45. Kaplan, R.S. and D.P. Norton, 'The balanced scorecard measures that drive performance', Harvard Business Review, January February 1992, pp. 71-79
  46. Keil, M., 'Pulling the plug: Software project management and the problem of project management and the problem of project escalation', MIS Quarterly, Vol.19, No.4, December 1995, pp. 421-447 https://doi.org/10.2307/249627
  47. Kirwin, B, Total cost of ownership, Gartner Group, 1987
  48. Kivijarvi, H. and T. Saarinen, 'Investment in information systems and the financial performance of the firm', Information & Management , Vol.28, 1995, pp. 143-163 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(95)94022-5
  49. Kumar, R. M., 'Understanding the business value of information system', Idea Group Publishing, 1999
  50. Lorin J. May, 'Major causes of software project failures', Crosstalk the Journal of Defense Software Engineering, 1996
  51. Lucas, H.C, Implementation: The key to successful information systems, New York: Columbia University Press, 1981
  52. Lucas, H. C, Information Technology and the Productivity Paradox, New York: Oxford University Press, 1999
  53. Aaranjeira, L. A., 'Software size estimation of object oriented systems', IEEE Tr. On Software Engineering, Vol.16, No.5, 1999
  54. Lee, S. and Kim, S.H., 'A Lag Effect of IT investment in firm performance', Information Resources Management Journal, Vol.19, No.1, pp. 43-69
  55. Lederer, A.L. and R. Mirani, 'Anticipating the benefits of proposed information systems', Journal of Information Technology, Vol.10, 1995, pp. 159-169 https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.1995.20
  56. Thatcher, M.E. and Jim R.Oliver., 'The impact of technology investment on a firm's production efficiency, product quality, and productivity', Journal of MIS, Vol.18, No.2, Fall 2001, pp. 17-45
  57. Menon, N.M., Lee. B., and Eldenburg.L., 'Productivity of information systems in the healthcare industry', Information System Research, Vol.11, No.1, March, 2000, pp. 83-92 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.1.83.11784
  58. Melville, N., K. Kraemer, and N. Gurbaxani, 'Review information technology and organizational performance an integrative model of IT business value', MIS Quaterly, Vol.28, No.2, 2004, pp. 283-322 https://doi.org/10.2307/25148636
  59. Meta Group., 'The business IT portfolio management', Meta Group White Paper, January, 2002
  60. Morris, M. and C. Ogan, 'The internet as mass medium', Journal of Communication, Vol.46, No.1, 1996, pp. 39-50 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01460.x
  61. Moon, J.W., and Y.G. Kim, 'Extending the TAM for a www Context', Information and Management, Vol.38, 2001, pp. 217-230 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6
  62. Murphy, T, Achieving business value from technology, John Wiley & Sons, 2003, pp. 39-76
  63. McFarlan, F.W., Robert, D.A., and L.M. Applegate, corporate information strategy and management, McGraw Hill, 2002
  64. Parker. M. M., Benson R. J. and Trainor H.E., Information Economics Linking Business Performance to Information Technology; Prentice Hall Int., Englewood Cliffs, 1989
  65. Pisello, T., ROI for Information Technology Providers, Information Press, 2001
  66. Pisello, T., and P.A. Strassmann, IT Value Chain Management, Information Economic Press, 2003
  67. Raymond, L., pare, G. and Bergeron, F., 'Matching information technology and organization structure: An empirical study with implications for performance', European journal of Information System, 1995
  68. Rainer, R.E., and H.J. Watson, 'The keys to executive information system success', Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.12, No.2, 1995, pp .83-98 https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1995.11518082
  69. Remenyi, D, Money A, and Sherwood Smith M., Effective Measurement & Management of IT Costs & Benefits, (Second Printing, Second Edition) Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, England, 2000
  70. Renkema, T.J.W., The IT Value Quest, John Wiley & Sons, LTD, 1999
  71. Ross, J., and B. M. Staw, 'Organizational escalation and exit: lessons from the shoreham nuclear power plant', Academy of Management Journal, August, 1993, pp. 701-732
  72. Ross, J., and G. Westerman, 'Evolving competencies for IT outsourcing', CISR Research, 2003
  73. Rowe, A.J., and J.D. Boulgarides, Managerial decision making, modules in management series, 1984, pp. 18-22
  74. Shang, S. and P.B. Seddon, 'Assessing and managing the benefits of enterprise systems: the business manager's perspective', Information Systems Journal, Vol.12, 2002, pp. 271-299 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2575.2002.00132.x
  75. Seddon, P. B., 'A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success', Information Systems Research, Vol.8, No.3, 1997, pp. 240-253 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.3.240
  76. Strassman, P.A., Information Payoff: The Transformation of Work in the Electronic Age, Free Press, 1985
  77. Strassmann, P., 'Management productivity as an IT measure', in P. Berger, J. G. Kobielus, and D. E. Sutherland(eds.) Measuring Business Value of Information Technologies, ICIT Press, Washington D.C., 1988. pp. 17-55
  78. Strassmann, P., 'Management productivity as an IT measure', in P. Berger, J.G. Kobielus, and D. E, 1990
  79. Strassmann, P., The Squandered Computer, New Canaan, CT: Information Economic Press, 1997
  80. Saunders, C.S., and J.W. Jone., 'Measuring performance of the information systems function', Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.8, 1992
  81. Saarinen, T., 'An Expanded Instrument for Evaluating Information System Success', Information and Management, No.31, 1996
  82. Tallon, P., Gurbaxani, V., and Kraemer, 'Executives perception of the business value of information technology: A process oriented approach', Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.16, No.4, spring 2000, pp. 145-173 https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2000.11518269
  83. Teo, S. T. and P. K. Wong, 'An empirical study of the performance impact of computerization in the retail industry', Omega International Journal of Management Science, Vol.26, 1998, pp. 611-621 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00007-3
  84. Theophanis. S, and D. Bruce, 'Does sucessful investment in information technology solve the productivity paradox?', Information & Management, Vol.38, No.2, 2000, pp. 103-107 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00058-6
  85. United States General Accounting Office(GAO), Executive Guide: Improving Mission Performance Through Strategic Information Management and Technologe, GAO/AIMD, May, 1994, pp. 94-115
  86. Weill, P, and M. Broadbent, 'Management by MAXIM', Sloan Management Review, Spring 1997
  87. Weill, P, and M. H. Olson, 'Managing investment in information technology: mini case examples and implication', MIS Quarterly, Vol.13, No.1, March 1989, pp. 3-17 https://doi.org/10.2307/248694
  88. Weill, P., and Vitale, M 'Assessing the health of an information system portfolio: A example from process engineering', MIS Quarterly, Vol.23, No.4, pp. 601-672, 1999 https://doi.org/10.2307/249491
  89. Weill, P., 'The relationship between investment in Information technology and firm performance: A study of the value manufacturing sector', Information Systems Research (3:4), December 1992, pp. 307-333 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.4.307
  90. Weill, P., and S. Aral, 'Managing the IT portfolio', CISR Research, 2003
  91. Weill, P., and C. Foglia, 'Who makes better IT decision - business or IT managers?', CISR Research, 2003
  92. Willcocks, L.P. and Lester, S., Beyond the IT productivity paradox, John Wiley & Sons, 1999
  93. Yosri, A., The relationship between information technology expenditures and revenue contributing factors in large corporations, Walden University Phd, 1992
  94. Yoris, A. A. and R. J. Kauffman, 'What do you know?: Rational expectations in information technology adoption and investment', Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.20, No.2, 2003, pp. 49-76 https://doi.org/10.1201/1078/43204.20.2.20030301/41470.8