DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of Flat DMT Penetration Based on a Large strain Formulation

대변형을 고려한 flat DMT의 3차원 관입 해석

  • 변위용 (한국과학기술원 건설 및 환경공학과) ;
  • 이승래 (한국과학기술원 건설 및 환경공학과)
  • Published : 2007.01.31

Abstract

Flat DMT penetration was analyzed using a finite element model based on a large strain formulation. The ABAQUS/Explicit, a commercial finite element method, was used to study the flat DMT penetration in soils. Then, because the very large mesh distortion occurred due to the penetration of flat DMT, the adaptive meshing technique was utilized to maintain a high quality mesh configuration. The undrained shear strength obtained from the flat DMT is estimated using only the horizontal stress index ($K_{D}$) and so it became necessary to examine using the analysis results obtained from the penetration of the flat DMT. Analysis results show that in normally consolidated region of $K_{D}=2$, the results obtained from the correlations proposed by Marchetti show good agreement with those estimated from the finite element method. The present analysis also shows that in overconsolidated region of $K_{D}>2$, the results obtained from the relationships proposed by Kamei and Iwasaki show good agreement with those provided by the penetration analysis.

대변형을 고려한 유한요소법을 이용하여 flat DMT의 3차원 관입을 모사하였다. 상용 프로그램으로 널리 알려진 ABAQUS/Explicit를 이용하여 flat DMT의 3차원 관입 해석을 수행하였으며 관입 도중에 발생되는 큰 요소 변형을 해결하기 위하여 adaptive meshing 기법을 도입하였다. 해석 결과를 바탕으로, flat DMT 시험방법으로부터 얻어지는 3가지 지수 중에 하나인 수평응력지수($K_{D}$)와 지반 설계 정수인 비배수 전단강도 간의 관계를 살펴보았다. 그 결과 $K_{D}=2$ 정규압밀지반에서는 Marchetti(1980)가 제안한 경험적 상관관계식과, $K_{D}$가 2이상으로 모사되는 과압밀지반에서는 Kamei & Iwasaki(1995)가 제안한 경험적 상관관계식과 잘 일치하는 결과를 제공하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 변위용, 김영상, 이승래 (2004a), 'Flat DMT를 이용한 국내 연약 지반의 비배수 전단강도 추정 시 영향을 미치는 요소들', 한국지반공학회논문집, 제20권, 제4호, pp.103-113
  2. 변위용, 김영상, 이승래, 정은택 (2004b), '국내 연약지반의 신뢰성있는 비배수 전단강도 추정을 위한 flat DMT와 인공신경망 이론의 적용', 한국지반공학회논문집, 제20권, 제5호, pp.17-25
  3. Campanella, R G., Robertson, P. K, Gillespire, D. and Grieg, J. (1985), 'Recent Developments in In-Situ Testing of Soils', Proceedings, 11th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol.2, San Francisco, pp.849-854
  4. Campanella, R G. and Robertson, P. K (1991), 'Use and interpretation of a research dilatometer', Can. Geotech. J., Vol.28, No.1, pp.113-126 https://doi.org/10.1139/t91-012
  5. Hamel, V., Roelandt, J. M., Gacel, J. N. and Schmit, F. (2000), 'Finite element modeling of clinch forming with automatic remeshing', Computers & Structures, Vol.77, No.2, pp.185-200 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(99)00207-2
  6. Hibbit, Karlsson and Sorensen, Inc. (2005), ABAQUS/Explicit User's Manual. Version. 6.5
  7. Hyun, S. and Lindgren, L. (2001), 'Smoothing and adaptive remeshing schemes for graded element', Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol.17, pp.1-17 https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0887(200101)17:1<1::AID-CNM380>3.0.CO;2-#
  8. Kamei, T. and Iwasaki, K. (1995), 'Evaluation of undrained shear strength of cohesive soils using a flat dilatometer', Soils and Foundations, Vol.35, No.2, pp.111-116
  9. Ladd, C. C., Foot, R, Ishihara, K., Poulos, H. G. and Schlosser, F. (1977), 'Stress-deformation and strength characteristics', Proc. 9th ICSMFE, Vol.2, State-of-the-Art-Paper, pp.421-494
  10. Marchetti, S. (1980), 'In situ tests by flat dilatorneter', Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol.106, No.GT3, pp.299-321
  11. Marchetti, S., Monaco, P., Totani, G. and Calabrese, M. (2001), 'The flat dilatometer test (DMT) in soil investigations. A Report by the ISSMGE Committee TC 16.', Proc. IN SITU 2001, Intnl. Conf. On In Situ Measurement of Soil Properties, Bali Indonesia, pp.1-41
  12. Mayne, P. W. (1987), 'Determining preconsolidation stress and penetration pore pressures from DMT contact pressures', Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol.1, No.3, pp.146-150
  13. Mayne, P. W. and Bachus, R. C. (1989), 'Penetration Pore Pressure in Clay by CPTU, DMT, and SBP', Proceedings, 12th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol.1, Rio de Janeiro, pp.291-294
  14. Mesri, G. (1975), Discussion of 'New design procedure for stability of soft clays' by Ladd, C.C., Foott, R., Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol.101, No.GT4, pp.409-412
  15. Rebelo, N., Nagtegaal, J. C. and Taylor, L. M. (1992), 'Comparison of implicit and explicit finite element methods in the simulation of metal forming processes', In Numerical Methods in Industrial Forming Processes, Chenot, Wood, Zienkiewicz eds., pp.99-108
  16. Sun, J. S., Lee, K H. and Lee, H. P. (2000), 'Comparison of implicit and explicit finite element methods for dynamic problems', Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol.105, No.1, pp.110-118 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00580-X
  17. Susila, E. and Hryciw, R. D. (2003), 'Large displacement FEM modeling of the cone penetration test (CPT) in normally con. solidated sand', Int. J Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., Vol.27, No.7, pp.585-602 https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.287
  18. Teh, C. I. and Houlsby, G. T. (1991), 'An analytical study of the cone penetration test in clay', Geotechnique, Vol.41, No.1, pp.17-34 https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1991.41.1.17