Application of Rainfall Runoff Model for an Ungauged Catchment

미 계측 지역의 강우 유출 모델의 적용

Lee, Hyo-Sang;Moon, Young-Il
이효상;문영일

  • Published : 20070900

Abstract

Civil engineers are often required to predict streamflow for catchments with limited or no flow measurements for various water resources projects. The objective of this paper is to develop an appropriate method for predicting steamflow at ungauged catchment, through a regionalisation of rainfall-runoff models. This paper presents the establishment of regression relationships between 17 physical catchment characteristics and 5 parameters of a Probability distributed model (Moore, 1985) by using a database of 126 well-gauged UK catchments. These devoped relationships allow predictive models to be identified without calibration proceures. The catchment clustering is attempted to improve the relevance of the relationships: more and less permeable catchment types (i.e. BFIHOST = 0.5 is used as a criteria). Stepeeise regression equations are developed for each group individuelly. Nash Sutcliffe Effciency is used as an objective function. Furthermore, the uncertainty is indicated as confidence intervals on the estimated streamflow. The results show that there are no physically meaningful relationships between model parameters and catchment characteristics. The applications results indicate that the best regression model improves our capability to predict the higher flow range in the less permeable catchments. However, predicting low flows in these catchments, and the full range of flows in more permeable catchments are still remained as unsolved problems.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdulla, F. and Lettenmaier, D. (1997) Development of regional parameter estimation equations for a macroscale hydrologic model. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 197, pp. 230-257 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03262-3
  2. Bayliss, A. (1999) Flood Estimation Handbook, Volume 5: Catchment Descriptors. Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford
  3. Beven, K.J. (2001) Rainfall-runoff modelling - The primer. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester
  4. Beven, K.J. (2000) Uniqueness of place and process representations in hydrological modelling. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 4, pp. 203-214 https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-4-203-2000
  5. Beven, K.J. and Freer, J. (2001) Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology, Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 249, pp. 11-29 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00421-8
  6. Beven, K. and Binley, A. (1992) The future of distributed models; model calibration and predictive uncertainty. Hydrological Processes, Vol. 6, pp. 279-298 https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360060305
  7. Bloschl, G. and Sivapalan, M. (1995) Scale Issues in Hydrological Modelling: A Review. Hydrological Processes. Vol. 9, pp. 251-290 https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360090305
  8. Boughton, W. and Droop, O. (2003) Continuous simulation for design flood estimation-a review. Environ. Modell. Softw. Vol.18, No.4, pp. 309-318 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00004-5
  9. Draper, N.R. and Smith, H. (2001) Applied regression analysis -3rd. John Wiley and Sons, pp. 335-338
  10. Haberlandt, U., Kloking, B., Krysanova, V., and Becker, A. (2001) Regionalisation of base flow index from dynamically simulated flow component-a case study in the Elbe River Basin. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 248, pp. 35-53 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00391-2
  11. Hughes, D. (1989) Estimation of the parameters of an isolated event conceptual model from physical catchment characteristics. Hydrological Sciences Journal-Journal DesSciences Hydrologiques, Vol.34, No.5, pp. 539-557 https://doi.org/10.1080/02626668909491361
  12. Institute of hydrology (1999) Flood Estimation Handbook, Walling-ford
  13. Jakeman, A., Littlewood, I., and Whitehead, P. (1990) Computation of the instantaneous unit hydrograph and identifiable component flows with application to two small upland catchments. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 117, pp. 275-300 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(90)90097-H
  14. Jun, X. (2002) Hydrological Modelling of Imperfect Gauged Basins: A New Challenge. Preparatory Workshop on the IAHS Initiative for the Prediction in Ungauged Basins (PUBs), Yamanashi University, Kofu, Japan, pp. 28-29
  15. Kokkonen, T.S., Jakeman, A.J., Young, P.C., and Koivusalo H.J. (2003) Predicting daily flows in ungauged catchments: model regionalization from catchment descriptors at the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory, North Carolina, Hydrological Processes, Vol. 17, No. 11, pp. 2219-2238 https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1329
  16. Kottegoda, N.T. and Rosso R. (1998) Statistics, Probability and Reliability for civil and environmental engineers, McGraw Hill international editions
  17. Lamb, R. and Kay, A. (2004) Confidence intervals for a spatially-generalized, continuous simulation flood frequency model for Great Britain. Water Resources Research, Vol. 40, No.7, W07501
  18. Lee, H. (2001) Rainfall-runoff model regionalisation in southeast England including uncertainty, MSc thesis. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, UK
  19. Lee, H. (2006) Regionalisation of rainfall runoff models in the UK, PhDdissertation. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, UK
  20. Lee, H., McIntyre, N., Wheater, H., and Young, A. (2005) Selection of conceptual models for regionalisation of the rainfall-runoff relationship. Journal of Hydrology. Vol. 312, No. 1-4, pp.125-147 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.02.016
  21. Lee, H., McIntyre, N.R., Wheater, H.S., and Young, A.R. (2006) Regionalisation of rainfall-runoff model in the UK including uncertainty estimations. Water Management, Proceedings of the Institution of Civi lEngineers, Vol.159, No.2, pp. 129-138
  22. Merz, R. and Bloschl, G. (2004) Regionalisation of catchment model parameters, Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 287, pp. 95-123 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.09.028
  23. Moore, R. (1985) The probability-distributed principle and runoff prediction at point and basin scales. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, Vol.30, No.2, pp. 273-297 https://doi.org/10.1080/02626668509490989
  24. Nash, J. and Sutcliffe, J. (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I - A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, Vol.10, pp. 282-290 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
  25. Parajka, J., Merz, R., and Blschl, G. (2005) A comparison of regionalisation methods for catchment model parameters. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, Vol. 2, pp. 509-542 https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-2-509-2005
  26. Peel, M., Chiew, F., Western, A., and McMahon, T. (2000) Extension of unimpaired monthly streamflow data and regionalisation of parameter values to estimate streamflow in ungauged catchments. Report prepared for the National Land and Water Resources Audit, in Australian Natural Resources Atlas website
  27. Post, D.A. and Jakeman, A.J. (1996) Relationships between catchment attributes and hydrological response characteristics in small Australian mountain ash catchments. Hydrological Processes, Vol.10, pp. 877-892 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199606)10:6<877::AID-HYP377>3.0.CO;2-T
  28. Post, D.A. and Jakeman, A.J. (1999) Predicting the daily streamflow of ungauged catchments in S.E. Australia by regionalising the parameters of a lumped conceptual rainfall-runoff model. Ecological Modeling, Vol.123, No.2-3, pp. 91-104 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00125-8
  29. Schreider, Y.S., Jakeman, A.J., and Pittock, B.A. (1996) Modeling Rainfall-Runoff from large catchment to basin scale: the Goulburn Valley, Victoria. Hydrological Processes, Vol.10, pp. 863-876 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199606)10:6<863::AID-HYP376>3.0.CO;2-8
  30. Sefton, C.E.M. and Howarth, S.M. (1998) Relationships between dynamic response characteristics and physical descriptors of catchments in England and Wales. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 211, No. 1-4, pp. 1-16 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00163-2
  31. Seibert, J. (1999) Regionalisation of parameters for a conceptual rainfall-runoff model. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. Vol. 98-99, No. 31, pp. 279-293 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00105-7
  32. Sivapalan, M., Takeuchi, K., Franks, S.W., Gupta, V.K., Karambiri, H., Lakshmi, V., Liang, X., McDonnell, J.J., Mendiondo, E.M., O'Connell, P.E., Oki, T., Pomeroy, J.W., Schertzer, D., Uhlenbrook, S., and Zehe, E. (2003) IAHS Decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB), 2003-2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences. Hydrological Sciences Journal. Vo.48, No.6, pp. 857-880 https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.48.6.857.51421
  33. Wagener, T., Wheater, H.S., and Gupta, H.V. (2004) Rainfall-runoff modelling in gauged and ungauged catchments, Imperial College Press, London
  34. Wheater, H.S. (2002) Progress in and prospects for fluvial flood modelling. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series a-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 360, No. 1796, pp. 1409-1431 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2002.1007
  35. Wheater, H.S., Jakeman, A.J., and Beven, K. (1993) Progress and destinations in rainfall-runoff modelling. In: A.J. Jakeman, M.B. Beck and M.J. McAleer (Editors), Modelling Chabge in Environmental Systems. John Wiley and sons, Chicester, pp. 101-132
  36. Young, A. (2000) Regionalisation a daily rainfall-runoff model within the United Kingdom, PhD Dissertation. Department of geophysics, University of Southampton, UK
  37. Young, A. (2002) River flow simulation within ungauged catchments using a daily rainfall-runoff model. British Hydrological Society-Occasional Papers, No. 13, pp. 31-38
  38. Young, A. (2006) Stream flow simulation within UK Ungauged catchments using a daily rainfall-runoff model. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 320, No. 1-2, pp. 155-172 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.017