Effects of Planting Density and Fertilization on Yield and Rutin Content in Tartary Buckwheat(Fagopyrum tataricum)

타타리 메밀의 재식밀도와 시비법이 수량과 루틴 함량에 미치는 영향

Park, Jong-In;Chang, Kwang-Jin;Park, Byoung-Jae;Lim, Yong-Sup;Park, Cheol-Ho
박종인;장광진;박병재;임용섭;박철호

  • Published : 20071200

Abstract

This study is conducted to establish culture practices ofTartary buckwheat for mass production in Korea. Grain yield and rutincontent of Tartary buckwheat are investigated under the differentculture conditions. Based on a plant, KW44 and KW53 showed highervalue of plant height, stem diameter, number of node, leaf, and branch,and branch length in a density of 30x30cm and 60x30cm, respectively.However, grain yields in the field(10a) were estimated to be higherin 20x20cm, 30x40cm, 40x20cm, and 60x30cm in order. Rutin content ofKW44 was highest in 60x30cm(1,887.1mg/100g) while that of KW53was highest in 40x20cm(1,569.3mg/100g).Grain yield of both KW44 and KW53 was higher in the fertilization ofN-P-K and N-K than other fertilization. Number of grain and grainweight per plant were respectively highest in the mixture of silicate withcompound fertilizer but those were not much different with only silicatetreatment. Silicate tended to increase rutin content only during earlygrowth stages and then decreased rutin content as plant grew to mature.The highest rutin content at the 90th day was found in leaf treated with only compound fertilizer(1987.3mg/100g).

본 논문은 타타리메밀의 생장해석을 통해 대량생산 표준재배기술의 지표를 구축하고자 한다. KW44과 KW53은 30x30, 60x30cm의 재식밀도에서 초장, 태경, 마디수, 분지수, 엽수, 분지장 등이 높았다. 특히, KW44는 30x30cm에서 종실수량도 높았으며, KW53은 60x30 재식밀도에서 월등히 종실수량이 높았다. 또한 두 품종 모두 조파가 산파에 비해 생육 및 수량이 높았다. 루틴함량은 KW44는 60x30cm(1,887.1mg/100g)구에서, KW53은 40x20cm(1,569.3mg/100g)구에서 루틴의 함량이 높은 경향이었다. 종실수량은 두 품종 모두 지상부의 생육이 좋았던 N-P-K와 N-K 시비구에서 높았으며, KW44의 P-K시비구를 제외하고 대조구보다 시비구에서 종실수량이 높은 경향을 보였다. KW44가 KW53보다 생육 및 종실 수량이 높았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Campbell, C. G. 1997. Buckwheat. Fagopyrum esculetum Moench, IPGRI
  2. Campbell, C. G. and G. H. Gubbels. 1978. Growing buck-wheat, Agriculture Canada Publication 1468, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa
  3. Hore, D. and R. S. Rathi. 2002. Collection, cultivation and characterization of buckwheat in Northeastern region of India. Fagopyrum 19: 11-15
  4. Kim, S. L., Y. K. Son, J. J. Hwang, S. K. Kim and H. S. Hur. 2001. Development of buckwheat sprout as a functional vegetable. RDA. J. Crop Sci. 40(2): 191-199
  5. Mondal, K. K., L. Bhar and S. S. Rana. 2005. Disease response of Taltary buckwheat genotypes as influenced by different fertilizer levels. Fagopyrum 22 : 89-93
  6. Pomeranz, Y. 1984. Buckwheat: Structure, Composition, and Utilization. CRC Critical Review in Food Science and Nutrition. 19(3) : 213-258
  7. Shah, M. and E. Hoult. 2002. Yield response of buckwheat to the application of major nutrients on the soils of New England Tablelands. Fagopyrum 19:71-77
  8. Sharma, V. K. 2005. A preliminary study on fertilizer management in buckwheat. Fagopyrum 22: 95-97
  9. Yu, T., Zhao, G. and Qiu, S. 1998. Effect of planting density on growth and yield of Tartary buckwheat. Proceeding of 7th International Symposium on Buckwheat (ed by C. Campbell and R. Przybylski) pp. 24-28
  10. Wang, Y. and C. Campbell, 2004. Buckwheat production, utilization, and research in China. Fagopyrum 21 : 123-133
  11. Wu, Y. B., C. H. Li and Y. Q. Qi. 1999. Breeding and cultivated techniques of a new variety Jiujiang. Tartary 1 : 16-17
  12. Zhao, G., Yang, J. and Zou, L. 2006. The current situation and prospect of buckwheat breeding in China. Proceedings of the international forum on Tartary buckwheat industrial economy( ed. Lin Rufa and K. Ikeda). pp. 62-67
  13. Zou, L., Zhao, G. and Yang, J. 2006. Determination of rutin in leaves of Tartary buckwheat by RP-HPLC. Proceedings of the international forum on Tartary buckwheat industrial economy (ed. Lin Rufa and K. Ikeda). pp. 143-148