Effects of Continuous Epidural Infusion after Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia for Mastectomy on Postoperative Pain, Nausea and Vomiting

유방절제술을 위한 흉추 경막외마취 후 지속적 경막외 주입이 수술 후 통증과 오심, 구토에 미치는 영향

Baek, Young-Hee;Kim, Soon-Im;Kim, Sun-Chong;Lee, Min-Hyuk;Ok, Si-Young
백영희;김순임;김선종;이민혁;옥시영

  • Published : 20070400

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is the most common cause of tumors in Korean women. Until recently, oncologic breast surgery was performed by using general inhalation anesthesia. However, this anesthetic method is associated with incomplete postoperative pain control and significantly more postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Therefore, this study examinated the value of thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) for a mastectomy, and evaluated the effects of a continuous epidural infusion on postoperative pain control and the PONV, which is known to be a better method than general anesthesia with intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV PCA). Methods: Sixty five patients scheduled for a mastectomy were randomly assigned and divided into two groups. The GA group underwent general anesthesia using O2-N2O-sevoflurane with IV PCA. The TEA group was injected with 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine with fentanyl 50μg at T4-5. After surgery the visual analogue scale (VAS) score of postoperative pain and nausea was checked. Results: The postoperative pain intensity was significantly (P < 0.05) lower in the TEA group at the postoperative period and during 6 hours compared with the GA group. Postoperative nausea intensity was significantly (P < 0.05) lower in the TEA group during 6 hours. Conclusions: These results suggest that TEA is a method suitable of regional anesthesia for a mastectomy and a continuous epidural catheter infusion is more effective on postoperative pain control than general anesthesia with IV PCA. In addition, it is a good method for decreasing the PONV to a similar level as IV PCA with antiemetics.

Keywords

References

  1. Korean Breast Cancer Society: Nationwide Korean breast cancer data of 2002. J Korean Breast Cancer Soc 2004; 7: 72-83 https://doi.org/10.4048/jkbcs.2004.7.2.72
  2. Quinn AC, Brown JH, Wallace PG, Asbury AJ: Studies in postoperative sequelae. Nausea and vomiting-still a problem. Anaesthesia 1994; 49: 62-5 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1994.tb03316.x
  3. Kim JE, Lee CB, Kim SC, Kim SI, Ok SY: Ramosetron compared with granisetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting following general anesthesia for breast mass excision. Korean J Anesthesiol 2005; 49: 507-12 https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2005.49.4.507
  4. Fujii Y, Tanaka H, Toyooka H: Granisetron reduces incidence of nausea and vomiting after breast surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1997; 41: 746-9 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04777.x
  5. Purhonen S, Niskanen M, Wustefeld M, Mustonen P, Hynynen M: Supplemental oxygen for prevention of nausea and vomiting after breast surgery. Br J Anaesth 2003; 91: 284-7 https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeg162
  6. Kim SI, Yoo IS, Park HN, Ok SY, Kim SC: Transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the P6 acupoint reduces postoperative nausea after minor breast surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol 2004; 47: 834-9 https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2004.47.6.834
  7. Watcha MF, White PF: Postoperative nausea and vomiting. Its etiology, treatment, and prevention. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: 162-84
  8. Gan TJ, Meyer T, Apfel CC, Chung F, Davis PJ, Eubanks S, et al: Consensus guidelines for managing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 62-71
  9. Fassoulaki A: Brachial plexus block for pain relief after modified radical mastectomy. Anesth Analg 1982; 61: 986-7
  10. Atanassoff PG, Alon E, Weiss BM: Intercostal nerve block for lumpectomy: superior postoperative pain relief with bupivacaine. J Clin Anesth 1994; 6: 47-51 https://doi.org/10.1016/0952-8180(94)90118-X
  11. Devereux DF: Successful treatment of stages IIIa and IIIb carcinoma of the breast by mastectomy in the elderly high risk patient using local anesthesia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1987; 165: 38-40
  12. Ok SY, Park SW, Kim SI, Kim SC, Lee MH: Thoracic epidural anesthesia for mastectomy. Korean J Anesthesiol 2006; 50: 646-9 https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2006.50.6.646
  13. Doss NW, Ipe J, Crimi T, Rajpal S, Cohen S, Fogler RJ, et al: Continuous thoracic epidural anesthesia with 0.2% ropivacaine versus general anesthesia for peri operative management of modified radical mastectomy. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 1552-7
  14. Lynch EP, Welch KJ, Carabuena JM, Eberlein TJ: Thoracic epidural anesthesia improves outcome after breast surgery. Ann Surg 1995; 222: 663-9 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199511000-00009
  15. Kotake Y, Matsumoto M, Morisaki H, Takeda J: The effectiveness of continuous epidural infusion of low-dose fentanyl and mepivacaine in perioperative analgesia and hemodynamic control in mastectomy patients. J Clin Anesth 2004; 16: 88-91 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2003.05.005
  16. Correll DJ, Viscusi ER, Grunwald Z, Moore JH Jr: Epidural analgesia compared with intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia: postoperative outcome measures after mastectomy with immediate TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2001; 26: 444-9
  17. Yeh CC, Yu JC, Wu CT, Ho ST, Chang TM, Wong CS: Thoracic epidural anesthesia for pain relief and postoperation recovery with modified radical mastectomy. World J Surg 1999; 23: 256-60 https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00013180
  18. Son JS, Jang YI, Lee MS, Oh KJ, Choe H: Comparison of general anesthesia and thoracic epidural anesthesia for breast mass excision surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol 2000; 39: 339-45 https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2000.39.3.339
  19. Ottesen S: The influence of thoracic epidural analgesia on the circulation at rest and during physical exercise in man. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1978; 22: 537-47 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1978.tb01336.x
  20. Sjogren S, Wright B: Circulatory changes during continuous epidural blockade. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl 1972; 46: 5-25
  21. Tanaka K, Harada T, Dan K: Low-dose thoracic epidural anesthesia induces discrete thoracic anesthesia without reduction in cardiac output. Reg Anesth 1991; 16: 318-21
  22. Takasaki M. Takahashi T: Respiratory function during cervical and thoracic extradural analgesia in patients with normal lungs. Br J Anaesth 1980; 52: 1271-6 https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/52.12.1271
  23. Groeben H, Schafer B, Pavlakovic G, Silvanus MT, Peters J: Lung function under high thoracic segmental epidural anesthesia with ropivacaine or bupivacaine in patients with severe obstructive pulmonary disease undergoing breast surgery. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 536-41 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200203000-00005
  24. Cohen MM, Duncan PG, DeBoer DP, Tweed WA: The postoperative interview: assessing risk factors for nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 1994; 78: 7-16
  25. Kleinman W, Mikhail M: Spinal, epidural, & caudal blocks. In: Clinical anesthesiology. 4th ed. Edited by Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ: New York, McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division. 2006, p 297
  26. Kim SI, Park DY, Ok SY, Kim SC: Effects of preemptive gabapentin on postoperative pain after mastectomy. Korean J Anesthesiol 2004; 47: 527-31 https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2004.47.4.527
  27. Tramer MR: Strategies for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2004; 18: 693-701 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2004.05.003
  28. Brown DL: Spinal, epidural, and caudal anesthesia. In: Miller's anesthesia. 6th ed. Edited by Miller RD: New York, Churchill Livingstone. 2005, p 1660
  29. Giebler RM, Scherer RU, Peters J: Incidence of neurologic complications related to thoracic epidural catheterization. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 55-63 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199701000-00009
  30. Scherer R, Schmutzler M, Giebler R, Erhard J, Stocker L, Kox WJ: Complications related to thoracic epidural analgesia: a prospective study in 1,071 surgical patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1993; 37: 370-4 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1993.tb03731.x
  31. Waldman SD: Complications of cervical epidural nerve blocks with steroids: a prospective study of 790 consecutive blocks. Reg Anesth 1989; 14: 149-51