Seed Orchard Management Considering the Correlation between Vegetative and Reproductive Traits in Pinus koraiensis S. et Z.

영양생장과 생식생장간 상관을 고려한 잣나무 채종원 관리 방안

Oh, C.Y.;Kang, K.S.;Choi, W.Y.;Han, S.U.;Kim, C.S.
오창영;강규석;최완용;한상억;김장수

  • Published : 2007.12.31

Abstract

The correlation between vegetative and reproductive traits of P. koraiensis was analyzed to obtain genetic information for seed orchard management and breeding criteria set. General combining ability (GCA) for the vegetative trait was estimated based on the volume growth and compared to reproductive growth (i.e. male and female strobili production). The volume growth was calculated as height x DBH2, which were collected from progeny tests at the ages of 8, 10, 15, and 20. Flowering assessment was conducted in a clone bank for 10 consecutive years. As a result of correlation analysis, we found that there was no significant correlation between vegetative and reproductive traits, and both traits could thus be considered independent. At age intervals of 8 through 10, 10 through 15, and 15 through 20, both traits were also not dependent. Superior families in GCA and flower production showed stably high ranks by ages, and inferior families did consistently low. This was proven and profound when upper 20% and lower 20% families were analyzed. The effect of corelation between vegetative and reproductive traits on the management of seed orchard was also discussed.

본 연구는 잣나무의 영양생장과 생식생장간의 상관관계를 구명하여 잣나무 채종원의 효율적 관리방안, 임목개량을 위한 선발기준 설정 및 우량품종 육성 등 금후 선발육종 방안을 제시하고자 하였다. 잣나무의 영양생장 분석을 위하여 차대검정 결과로부터 재적생장에 대한 일반조합능력을 추정하였으며, 재적생장은 수령 8년, 10년, 15년 및 20년 때의 수고 및 흉고직경 생장으로부터 산출하였고 이를 10년 동안의 개화량 성적과 비교·분석하였다. 그 결과 재적생장에 대한 일반조합능력과 개화량 간에는 상관관계가 나타나지 않아 서로 독립적인 형질로 판단되었다. 그리고 8년~10년, 10년~15년 및 15년~20년의 수령 간격에 있어서도 일반조합능력과 개화량 간에는 상관관계가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 일반조합능력 및 개화량이 우수한 가계는 수령 증가에 관계없이 계속하여 우수한 것으로 나타났으며, 불량한 가계는 지속적으로 불량한 것으로 나타났다. 특히 이러한 현상은 생장 및 개화가 우수한 상위 20%와 불량한 하위 20% 가계를 대상으로 분석하였을 때 더욱 뚜렷하게 입증되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김종한. 2006. 채종원의 수형조절이 종자생산에 미치는 영향. 충북대학교 박사학위논문
  2. 한상억, 이상봉, 박형순. 1992. 잣나무 수형목 클론의 생장과 개화특성에 대한 유전모수 및 상관. 임육연보. 28:5-10
  3. 한상억, 최완용, 정헌관, 강규석. 1997. 여러 환경에서의 차대검정 결과에 대한 표준화 방법 및 그 적용 실례. 임육연보. 33:47-53
  4. 한상억, 최완용, 권혁민, 이상봉. 1985. 잣나무 생장특성의 광의의 유전력과 수형목 클론변이에 의한 개량효과. 한국임학회지. 69:1-5
  5. 한상억, 최완용, 탁우식. 1997. 잣나무 클론의 개화특성변이. 한국육종학회지. 29:139-144
  6. Almqvist C, Jansson G, Sonesson J. 2001. Genotypic correlations between early cone-set and height growth in Picea abies clonal trials. Forest Genetics. 8:197-204
  7. Askew GR. 1988. Estimation of gamete pool composition in clonal seed orchards. Silvae Genet. 37:227-232
  8. Bilir N, Prescher F, Ayan S, Lindgren D. 2006. Growth characters and number of strobili in clonal seed orchards of Pinus sylvestris. Euphytica. 152:293-301
  9. Choi WY, Kang KS, Jang KH, Han SU, Kim CS. 2004. Sexual asymmetry based on flowering assessment in a clonal seed orchard of Pinus densiflora. Silvae Genet. 53:55-59
  10. Chon SK, Kim YC, Chung HP. 1981. Effect of cone production on the diameter increment in Pinus Koraiensis. The Memorial Collection of Dr. Y.S. Cho's Sixty Year Old Birthday. 785-797
  11. El-Kassaby YA, Cook C. 1994. Female reproductive energy and reproductive success in a Douglas-fir seed orchard and its impact on genetic diversity. Silvae Genet. 43:243-246
  12. Eriksson G, Jonsson A, Lindgren D. 1973. Flowering in a clone trial of Picea abies Karst. Stud. For. Suec. 110. p.45
  13. Givnish TJ. 1980. Ecological constraints on the evolution of breeding systems in seed plants: dioecy and dispersal in gymnosperms. Evolution. 34:959-972 https://doi.org/10.2307/2408001
  14. Griffin AR. 1982. Clonal variation in Radiata pine seed orchards I. Some flowering, cone and seed production traits. Aust. For. Res. 12:295-302
  15. Hannerz M, Aitken S, Ericsson T, Ying CC. 2001. Inheritance of strobili production and genetic correlation with growth in lodgepole pine. Forest Genetics. 8:323-329
  16. Jonsson KI. 2000. Life histroy consequences of fixed costs of reproduction. Ecoscience. 7:423-427 https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.2000.11682612
  17. Kang KS, El-Kassaby YA, Choi WY, Han SU, Kim CS. 2003. Genetic gain and diversity caused by genetic thinning in a clonal seed orchard of Pinus densiflora. Silvae Genet. 52:220-223
  18. Kang KS, Choi WY, Han SU, Hur SD, Kim WW, Park YH. 2005. Clonal contribution and sexual asymmetry based on flowering assessment in two clone banks of Pinus koraiensis. Korean J. Breeding. 37:5-10
  19. Kang KS, Lindgren D, Mullin TJ. 2001. Prediction of genetic gain and gene diversity in seed orchard crops under alternative management strategies. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103:1099-1107 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220100700
  20. Koenig WD, Knops JMH. 1998. Scale of mast- seedling and tree-ring growth. Nature 396:225-226
  21. Kozlowski TT, Pallardy SG. 1996. Physiology of woody plants. (2nd ed.) Academic Press Inc., 411pp
  22. Muller-Starch G. 1982. Tracing external pollen contribution to the offspring of Scots pine seed orchard. In: Proc. IUFRO Mtg. on breeding strategies including multi clonal varieties. Lower Saxony FRI, Dep. of For. Tree Breeding, Escherode, Germay. p176
  23. Nikkanen T, Velling P. 1987. Correlations between flowering and some vegetative characteristics of grafts of Pinus sylvestris. Forest Ecology and Management. 19:35-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(87)90009-0
  24. Obeso JR. 2002. The costs of reproduction in plants. New Phytologist. 155:321-348 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00477.x
  25. Schmidtling RC. 1981. The inheritance of precocity and its relationship with growth in loblolly pine. Silvae Genet. 30:188-192
  26. Sedgley M, Griffin AR. 1989. Sexual Reproduction of Tree Crops. Academic Press Inc., p.378
  27. Yasumura Y, Hikosaka K, Hirose T. 2006. Resource allocation to vegetative and reproductive growth in relation to mast seedling in Fagus crenata. Forest Ecology and Management. 229:228-233 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.04.003