DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of the Two Impairment Classes Publicized by the American Medical Association in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Patients

복합부위통증증후군 환자에서 미국의사협회 영구장애평가지침에서 제시된 장애등급 평가방법의 비교

  • Shin, Hwa Yong (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Yong Min (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Nahm, Francis Sahngun (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Seong Joo (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Koo, Mi Suk (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Suh, Jeong Hun (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Sim, Sung Eun (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jo, Ji Yon (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Sang Chul (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Yong Chul (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • 신화용 (서울대학교 의과대학 마취통증의학교실) ;
  • 최용민 (서울대학교 의과대학 마취통증의학교실) ;
  • 남상건 (서울대학교 의과대학 마취통증의학교실) ;
  • 박성주 (서울대학교 의과대학 마취통증의학교실) ;
  • 구미숙 (서울대학교 의과대학 마취통증의학교실) ;
  • 서정훈 (서울대학교 의과대학 마취통증의학교실) ;
  • 심성은 (서울대학교 의과대학 마취통증의학교실) ;
  • 조지연 (서울대학교 의과대학 마취통증의학교실) ;
  • 이상철 (서울대학교 의과대학 마취통증의학교실) ;
  • 김용철 (서울대학교 의과대학 마취통증의학교실)
  • Received : 2007.09.19
  • Accepted : 2007.11.09
  • Published : 2007.12.10

Abstract

Background: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is not regarded as an impairment in Korea. Guidelines for rating this impairment are under development by the Korean Academy of Medical Science based on that of the American Medical Association (AMA). However, no studies have been done on the validity of these guidelines in Korea. We therefore evaluated the validity of these guidelines using the criteria from the chapter on the central and peripheral nervous system (CNS-PNS class) and the worksheet for calculating total pain-related impairment score (TPRIS class). Methods: TPRIS and CNS-PNS classes were calculated through interviews of 28 CRPS patients. The correlation between the two classes was calculated. Results: TPRIS class and CNS-PNS class were well correlated (r = 0.593, P < 0.05). Conclusions: Both TPRIS or CNS-PNS classes were well correlated and could be used for evaluation of impairment. However, the CNS-PNS class is simpler and quicker to complete.

Keywords

References

  1. Woodwell DA: National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1998 summary. Adv Data 2000; 315: 1-20
  2. Guo HR, Tanaka S, Halperin WE, Cameron LL: Back pain prevalence in US industry and estimates of lost workdays. Am J Public Health 1999; 89: 1029-35 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.89.7.1029
  3. Lindblom U, Merskey H, Mumford JM, Nathan PW, Noordcnbos W, Sunderland S: Pain terms a current list with definitions and notes on usage. Pain 1986; 24(supp1): 215-21 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(86)90113-2
  4. Dcyo RA: Early diagnostic evaluation of low back pain. J Gen Intern Med 1986; 1: 328-38 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596214
  5. Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N, Modic MT, Malkasian D, Ross JS: Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 69-73 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199407143310201
  6. Wiesel SW. Tsounnas N, Peffer HL. Citrin CM, Patronas N: A study of computer-assisted tomography. I. The incidence of positive CAT scans in an asymptomatic group of patients. Spine 1984; 9: 549-51 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198409000-00003
  7. Cocchiarella L, Andersson GB: Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impainncnt. 5th ed. Chicago, AMA press. 2001. pp 1-24, 336-7, 343-4, 495, 553, 565-91, 604-6
  8. Kim YC: The evaluation of permanent impairment in chronic pain patients. Korean J Pain 2007; 20: 1-7 https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2007.20.1.1
  9. Galer BS, Bruehl S, Harden RN: IASP diagnostic criteria for complex regional pain syndrome: a preliminary empirical validation study. International Association for the Study of Pain. Clin J Pain 1998; 14: 48-54 https://doi.org/10.1097/00002508-199803000-00007
  10. Kim YC: Complex regional pain syndrome. Korean J Pain 2004; 17(suppl): 104-8 https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2004.17.S.S104
  11. Aronoff GM, Harden N, Stanton-Hicks M, Dono AJ, Ensalada LH, Klimek EH, et al: American Academy of Disability Evaluating Physicians (AADEP) position paper: complex regional pain syndrome I (RSD): impairment and disability issues. Pain Med 2002; 3: 274-88 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-4637.2002.02044.x
  12. Schasfoon FC, Bussmann JB, Starn HJ: Outcome mcasures for complex regional pain syndrome type I: an overview in the context of me international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Disabil Rehabil 2000; 22: 387-98 https://doi.org/10.1080/096382800406004
  13. Vaneker M, Wilder-Smith OH, Schrombges P, Ocrlemans HM: Impairment as measured by ISS do not greatly change between one and eight years after CRPS I diagnosis. Eur J Pain 2006; 10: 639-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.10.003
  14. Veldman PH, Reynen HM, Arntz IE, Goris RJ: Signs and symptoms of reflex sympathetic dystrophy: prospective study of 829 patients. Lancet 1993; 342: 1012-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(93)92877-V
  15. Harper JD: Determining foot and ankle impairments by the AMA fifth edition guides. Foot Ankle Clin 2002; 7: 291-303 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1083-7515(02)00029-3

Cited by

  1. Do Severity Score and Skin Temperature Asymmetry Correlate with the Subjective Pain Score in the Patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome? vol.27, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2014.27.4.339