Evaluation of the Geum River by Multivariate Analysis: Principal Component Analysis and Factor Analysis

다변량분석법을 이용한 금강 유역의 수질오염특성 연구

  • Kim, Mi-Ah (Department of Environmental Diagnostics Research, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Lee, Jae-kwan (Department of Environmental Diagnostics Research, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Zoh, Kyung-Duk (Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Seoul National University)
  • 김미아 (국립환경과학원 환경진단연구부) ;
  • 이재관 (국립환경과학원 환경진단연구부) ;
  • 조경덕 (서울대학교 보건대학원 환경보건학과)
  • Received : 2006.10.19
  • Accepted : 2006.11.28
  • Published : 2007.01.30

Abstract

The main aim of this work is focus on the Geum river water quality evaluation of pollution data obtained by monitoring measurement during the period 2001-2005. The complex data matrix 19 (entire monitoring stations)*13 (parameters), 60 (month)*13 (parameters) and 20 (season)*13 (parameters) were treated with different multivariate techniques such as factor analysis/principal component analysis (FA/PCA). FA/PCA identified two factor (19*13) classified pollutant Loading factor (BOD, COD, pH, Cond, T-N, T-P, $NH_3$-N, $NO_3$-N, $PO_4$-P, Chl-a), seasonal factor (water temp, SS) and three Factor (60*13, 20*13) classified pollutant Loading factor (BOD, COD, Cond, T-N, T-P, $NH_3$-N, $NO_3$-N, $PO_4$-P), seasonal factor (water temp, SS) and metabolic factor (Chl-a, pH). Loadings of pollutant factor is potent influence main factor in the Geum river which is explained by loadings of pollutant factor at whole sampling stations (71.16%), month (52.75%) and season (56.57%) of main water quality stations. Result of this study is that pollutant loading factor is affected at Gongju 1, 2, Buyeo 1, 2, Gangkyeong, Yeongi stations by entire stations and entire month (Gongju 1, Cheongwon stations), April, May, July and August (buyeo 1) by month. Also the pollutant Loading factor is season gives an influence in winter (Gongju 1, buyeo 1) from main sampling stations, but Cheongwon characteristic is non-seasonal influenced. This study presents necessity and usefulness of multivariate statistic techniques for evaluation and interpretation of large complex data set with a view to get better information data effective management of water sources.

Keywords

References

  1. 금강수계관리위원회, 금강 수역별 유량관측망 설치 및 운영 보고서 (2005)
  2. 김건하, 금강유역 비점원에서 발생하는 미생물 오염 및 수질에 대한 영향, 한국물환경학회지, 22(3), pp. 504-512 (2006)
  3. 김영주, 주성분분석에 의한 도시호수의 수질평가에 관한 연구, 환경관리학회지, 9(2), pp. 197-203 (2003)
  4. 김종구, 통계분석 기법을 이용한 금강수계의 수질평가, 한국환경과학회지, 11(12), pp. 1281-1289 (2002)
  5. 박해식, 박청길, 송미정, 백경훈, 신성교, 통계분석법을 이용한 낙동강 수질 특성 평가, 한국물환경학회지, 17(6), pp. 693-701 (2001)
  6. 신성교, 박청길, 송교욱, 주성분 분석법을 이용한 낙동강 하구 해역의 수질 평가, 한국환경관리학회지, 7(2), pp. 171-176 (1998)
  7. 유호식, 한강수질에 영향을 끼치는 요인들의 통계 분석, 대한환경공학회지, 24(12), pp. 2139-2150 (2002)
  8. 이재우, 논고- 수출선행지수 개발 및 적합성 분석, 수은해외경제, pp. 4-17 (2006)
  9. 임창수, 금강유역 14개 관측점의 수질자료를 이용한 수질의 다변량 분석, 한국환경화학회지, 8(3), pp. 331-336 (1999)
  10. 최용석, 정관모 공저, SAS를 활용한 다변량 분석 기법과 응용, 자유아카데미 , pp. 36-95 (2003)
  11. 한국토지공사, 국립환경과학원, 행정중심복합도시 환경.생태분야 조사연구 중간보고서 (2006.7.)
  12. 한원석, 농업생명과학을 위한 통계적 방법, 자유아카데미, pp. 632-645 (1997)
  13. 허명회, 양경숙 공저, SPSS 다변량자료분석, SPSS 아카데미, pp. 3-65 (2004)
  14. 환경부, 물환경정보시스템, http://water.nier.go.kr/weis, 국립환경과학원 (accessed Jul. 2006)
  15. 환경부, 중부권의 젖줄 금강 살리기-대청호등 금강수계 물관리 종합대책 (2001)
  16. Bernard, P., Antoine, L. and Bernard, L., Principal Component Analysis: an Appropriate Tool for Water Quality Evaluation and Management-application to a Tropical Lake System, Ecological Modeling, 178, pp. 295-311 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.03.007
  17. Karim, B. and Taha, F. M., Using Principal Component Analysis to Monitor Spatial and Temporal Changes in Water Quality, Journal of Hazardous Materials, B100, pp. 179-195 (2003)
  18. Petersen, W., Bertino, L., Callies, U. and Zorita, E., Process Identification by Principal Componebt Analysis of River Water-quality Data, Ecological Modeling, 138, pp. 293-213 (2001)
  19. Ying, O., Evaluation of River Water Monitoring Stations by Principal Component Analysis, Water Research, 39, pp. 2621-2635 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.04.024