Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

The Korean Society of Occupational & Environmental Medicine (대한직업환경의학회)
권호 표지

The Effects of Indoor Air Quality on the Neurobehavioral Performance of Elementary School Children

신축학교 실내공기질이 초등학생들의 인지기능에 미치는 영향

Kim, Dae-Seop;Kim, Sun-Ju;Park, Si-Young;Jeon, Man-Joong;Kim, Gyu-Tae;Kim, Chang-Yoon;Chung, Jong-Hak;Baek, Sung-Ok;SaKong, Joon
김대섭;김선주;박시영;전만중;김규태;김창윤;정종학;백성옥;사공준

  • Published : 20070300
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: Most studies on the indoor air quality of newly built schools have focused only on the number of schools exceeding a standard or on subjective symptoms, such as sneezing, irritated eyes and an irritated nose. However, there has been no report on how poor indoor air quality affects children’s academic performance. This study evaluated the effects of indoor air quality on the neurobehavioral performance of elementary school children. Methods: This study measured the indoor air pollutants and compared children’s performance, using a computerized neurobehavioral test, between a newly built and a 12-year-old school. In addition, a questionnaire was administered regarding the indoor air quality related symptoms of children in a newly built and a 12-year-old school. Results: In the newly built school, the formaldehyde levels in the 1st and 4th classes with an open window were 34.6 and 27.3 μg/m3, respectively. The levels in the 1st and 4th classes with the window closed were 80.2 and 127.1 μg/m3, respectively. In the 12-year-old school, the formaldehyde levels in 1st and 4th class with open and closed window were 12.6 and 7.5 μg/m3, and 19.8 and 25.2 μg/m3, respectively. With respect to total volatile organic compounds, the levels in the 1st and 4th classes with the window open in the newly built school were 87.2 and 428.2 μg/m3, respectively. In the 1st and 4th classes with the window closed, the total volatile organic compounds were 1,283.5 and 1,715.4 μg/m3, respectively. In the 12-year-old school, the total volatile organic compounds were 240.9 and 150.8 μg/m3, and 371.9 and 448.0 μg/m3 in the 1st and 4th classes, respectively. In the case of a newly built school, the performance of the students in the neurobehavioral test in the 4th class with the window closed was 8.3% lower than for those in the 1st class with the window closed, but was only 5.9% lower when the windows were open. There was a statistical significant difference in the total numbers of symptoms between the two schools. Conclusions: These results suggest a proper evaluation of the indoor air quality within schools is required into both the level of contamination and the health effects of these contaminants toward children.

목적: 신축초등학교와 대조학교를 선정하여 교실 내 포름알데히드와 TVOCs를 측정하고 컴퓨터 신경행동검사를 이용하여 실내공기 오염물질이 학생들의 인지기능에 미치는 영향을 평가하였다. 방법: 신축초등학교 5학년 71명을 실내공기 오염물질 노출군으로 하고, 개교한지 12년째인 대구시의 일개 초등학교 5학년 2학급 63명을 대조군으로 하여 실내공기 오염물질농도 측정 및 컴퓨터 신경행동검사를 실시하였다. 결과: 신축학교에서 의도적으로 창문을 개방한 학급에서 1교시 포름알데히드 농도는 34.6 μg/m3, 4교시에는 27.3 μg/m3, 창문을 개방하지 않은 학급에서 1교시 80.2 μg/m3, 4교시 127.1 μg/m3, 대조학교에서는 2학급 각각 1교시에 12.6 μg/m3, 7.5 μg/m3, 4교시에 19.8 μg/m3, 25.2 μg/m3였다. TVOCs의 경우 신축학교의 의도적으로 창문을 개방한 학급에서 1교시에 농도는 487.2 μg/m3, 4교시에 428.2 μg/m3, 창문을 개방하지 않은 학급에서 1교시에 농도는 1,283.5 μg/m3, 4교시에 1,715.4 μg/m3, 대조학교의 경우 2학급에서 각각 1교시에 농도는 240.9 μg/m3, 150.8 μg/m3, 4교시에 농도는 371.9 μg/m3, 448.0 μg/m3였다. 부호숫자 짝짓기의 평균반응시간은 대조학급이 1교시에 2,585 msec에서 4교시에 2,459 msec으로 감소한 반면 신축학교의 창문을 의도적으로 개방한 학급은 2,343 msec에서 2,510 msec으로, 평소대로 수업한 학급은 2,340 msec에서 2,563 msec으로 반응시간이 각각 167 msec, 223 msec 증가하였다. 1교시의 부호숫자 짝짓기의 반응시간을 100%로 했을 때 창문을 의도적으로 개방한 학급은 4교시에 5.9% 증가하였고(p＜0.01), 평소대로 수업한 학급은 8.3% 증가하였다(p＜0.01). 반면에 대조학급은 4교시에 5.0% 감소하였다(p＜0.01). 결론: 향후 학교의 실내공기질의 안전성 평가는 샘플링된 공기의 오염수준의 측정뿐만 아니라 학생들의 건강영향도 함께 고려되는 것이 바람직할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Apte MG, Fisk WJ, Daisey JM. Associations between indoor $ CO_2 $ concentrations and sick building syndrome symptoms inU.S. office buildings: an analysis of the 1994-1996 BASE study data. Indoor Air 2000;10(4):246-57 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0668.2000.010004246.x
  2. Bartlett KH, Kennedy SM, Brauer M, Dill B, van Netten C. Predictors of exposure to indoor $ CO_2$ and bioaerosols in elementaryschool classrooms. Indoor Air 1999;1:252-7
  3. Bayer CW, Crow SA, Fischer J. Causes of indoor air quality problems in schools: summary of science research. SEMCO Inc. Columbia. 2000. pp 1-41
  4. Cho KS, Gu JW, Kim KA, Kim HW, Kim HA, Noh YM, Maeng KW, Park JI, Lee KS, Lee SH, Lee SH, Lee WC, Lim Y, Lim HW, Jung MH, Jung CK. The Occupational Environmental Health, 3rd edition. Institute of Industrial Medicine Catholic Industrial Medical Center. Seoul. 2003. pp 277-92
  5. Chung JH, Sakong J, Kang PS, Kim CY, Lee KS, Jeon MJ, Sung NJ, Ahn SH, Won KC. Cross-cultural comparison of neurobehavioral performance in Asian workers. Neurotoxicology 2003;24(4-5):533-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-813X(03)00056-1
  6. Daisey JM, Angell WJ, Apte MG. Indoor air quality, ventilation and health symptoms in schools: an analysis of existing information. Indoor Air 2003;13(1):53-64 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0668.2003.00153.x
  7. Faustman EM, Silbernagel SM, Fenske RA, Burbacher TM, Ponce RA. Mechanisms underlying children susceptibility to environmental toxicants. Environ Health Perspect 2000;108(Suppl.1):13-21 https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.00108s113
  8. Hodgson AT, Beal D, McIlvaine JE. Source of formaldehyde, other aldehyde and terpenes in a new manufactured house. Indoor Air 2002;12(4):235-42 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0668.2002.01129.x
  9. Inha University Hospital. The Association between Asthma and Allergy Related Disease and VOC Level of Elementary Schools and Daycare Centers. Korea Democratic Labor Party. Seoul. 2005. pp 1-180. (translated by Kim DS)
  10. Korea University. Midterm Report on Environmental Assessment of School Buildings. Research Center for Environmental Health. Seoul. 2005. pp 1-110. (translated by Kim DS)
  11. Lagercrantz L, Wistrand M, Willen U, Wargocki P, Witterseh T, Sundell J. Negative impact of air pollution on productivity: previous Danish findings repeated in new Swedish test room. Proceedings of Healthy Buildings 2000;1:653-8
  12. Landrigan PJ. Environmental hazards for children in USA. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 1998;11(2):189-94
  13. Mendell MJ, Fisk WJ, Petersen MR, Hines CJ, Dong M, Faulkner D, Deddens JA, Ruder AM, Sullivan D, Boeniger MF. Indoor particles and symptoms among office workers: results from a double-blind cross-over study. Epidemiology 2002;13(3):296-304 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-200205000-00010
  14. Mendell MJ, Heath GA. Do indoor pollutants and thermal conditions in schools influence student performance? A critical review of the literature. Indoor Air 2005;15(1):27-52
  15. Meyer B, Hermanns K. Reducing indoor air formaldehyde concentrations. J Air Pollut Control Assoc 1985;35(8):816-21 https://doi.org/10.1080/00022470.1985.10465960
  16. Myhrvold AN, Olsen E, Lauridsen O. Indoor environment in schools-pupils health and performance in regard to $ CO_2$concentrations.Indoor Air 1996;4:369-74
  17. Pilotto LS, Douglas RM, Attewell RG, Wilson SR. Respiratory effects associated with indoor nitrogen dioxide exposure in children. Int J Epidemiol 1997;26(4):788-96 https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/26.4.788
  18. Rosen KG, Richardson G. Would removing indoor air particulates in children's environments reduce rate of absenteeism a hypothesis. Sci Total Environ 1999;234(1-3):87-93 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00118-7
  19. Shendell DG, Prill R, Fisk WJ, Apte MG, Blake D, Faulkner D. Associations between classroom $ CO_2$ concentrations and student attendance in Washington and Idaho. Indoor Air 2004;14(5):333-41 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00251.x
  20. Sohn JR, Byeon SH, Kim YW, Kim JH, Cho YS, Lee JY, Park YJ. Assessment of conscious coginition degree and survey on the indoor air quality at a public at a public school in Seoul. Korean J Sanitation 2003;18(3):101-10. (Korean)
  21. Sohn JR, Yoon SU, Kim JH, Lee YS, Choi HY, Kim YS, Son BS, Yang WH, Kim MH. The assessment and recognition on indoor air quality at schools in Korea. Korean J Sanitation 2005;20(3):1-9. (Korean)
  22. U.S EPA. Indoor Air Quality and student performance. Available: http://www.epa.gov/iaq/schools/pdfs/publications/ iaq_and_student_performance.pdf[cited August 2003]
  23. Wargocki P, Wyon DP, Baik YK, Clausen G, Fanger PO. Perceived air quality, sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms and productivity in an office with two different pollution loads. Indoor Air 1999;9(3):165-79 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1999.t01-1-00003.x
  24. Wargocki P, Wyon DP, Sundell J, Clausen G, Fanger PO. The effects of outdoor air supply rate in an office on perceived air quality, sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms and productivity. Indoor Air 2000;10(4):222-36 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0668.2000.010004222.x
  25. Wargocki P, Wyon DP, Fanger PO. The performance and subjective responses of call-center operators with new and used supply air filters at two outdoor air supply rates. Indoor Air 2004;14:7-16 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00304.x
  26. Wyon DP. The effects of indoor air quality on performance and productivity. Indoor Air 2004;14:92-101
  27. Yang WH, Byeon JC, Kim YH, Kim DW, Son BS, Lee JE. Assessment of indoor air quality of classroom in school by means of source generation-case study. Journal of the Environmental Sciences 2005;14(10):979-83. (Korean) https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2005.14.10.979