The Changes of Posterior Corneal Surface and High-Order Aberrations after Refractive Surgery in Moderate Myopia

Lee, Min-Joung;Lee, Sang-Mok;Lee, Hyun-Ju;Wee, Won-Ryang;Lee, Jin-Hak;Kim, Mee-Kum

  • Published : 20070900

Abstract

Purpose: To compare forward shift of posterior corneal surface and higher-order aberration (HOA) changes after LASIK, LASEK, and wavefront-guided LASEK surgery in moderate myopia Methods: One hundred eighty four eyes undergoing LASIK, LASEK and wavefront-guided LASEK with VISX STAR S4 were included in this study. The posterior corneal elevation was measured with Orbscan before, 2 and 4 months after surgery. Changes of the elevation were assessed using the difference map generated from preoperative and postoperative elevation maps. The values of higher-order aberrations were evaluated preoperatively and 2 months postoperatively with Wavefront aberrometer. Results: The posterior corneal surface displayed forward shift of 27.2±11.45 µm, 24.3±9.76 µm in LASIK group, 23.4±10.5 µm, 23.6±10.55 µm in LASEK group, 24.0±14.95 µm, 28.4±14.72 µm in wavefront- guided LASEK group at 2 months and 4 months, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences among those three groups, and between 2 and 4 months. The root mean score (RMS) of HOA was increased after LASIK and LASEK (p=0.000, p=0.000, respectively). The mean change of HOA-RMS was significantly smaller in wavefront-guided LASEK than LASIK or LASEK (p=0.000, p=0.000, respectively, Bonferroni-corrected). Conclusions: The changes of posterior corneal surface forward shift showed no difference among LASIK, LASEK and wavefront-guided LASEK in moderate myopia. HOAs were significantly increased after LASIK and LASEK. The changes of HOAs were significant smaller in wavefront-guided LASEK than LASIK or LASEK.

Keywords

References

  1. Muller LJ, Pels E, Vrensen GF. The specific architecture of the anterior stroma accounts for maintenance of corneal curvature. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:437-43 https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.85.4.437
  2. Wang Z, Chen J, Yang B. Posterior corneal surface topographic changes after laser in situ keratomileusis are related to residual corneal bed thickness. Ophthalmology 1999;106:406-9; discussion 409-10 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90083-0
  3. Baek T, Lee K, Kagaya F, et al. Factors affecting the forward shift of posterior corneal surface after laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology 2001;108:317-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00502-9
  4. Kamiya K, Oshika T, Amano S, et al. Influence of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy on the posterior corneal surface. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26:867-71 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00429-6
  5. Naroo SA, Charman WN. Changes in posterior corneal curvature after photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26:872-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00413-2
  6. Seitz B, Torres F, Langenbucher A, et al. Posterior corneal curvature changes after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology 2001;108:666-72; discussion 673 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00581-9
  7. Miyata K, Kamiya K, Takahashi T, et al. Time course of changes in corneal forward shift after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120: 896-900 https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.120.7.896
  8. Shimmura S, Yang HY, Bissen-Miyajima H, et al. Posterior corneal protrusion after PRK. Cornea 1997;16:686-8
  9. Seiler T, Koufala K, Richter G. Iatrogenic keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 1998;14:312-7
  10. Seiler T, Quurke AW. Iatrogenic keratectasia after LASIK in a case of forme fruste keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998;24:1007-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(98)80057-6
  11. Tanabe T, Oshika T, Tomidokoro A, et al. Standardized color coded scales for anterior and posterior elevation maps of scanning slit corneal topography. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1298-302 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01030-8
  12. Oshika T, Miyata K, Tokunaga T, et al. Higher order wavefront aberrations of cornea and magnitude of refractive correction in laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1154-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01028-X
  13. corneal wavefront aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol 1999;127:1-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(98)00288-8
  14. Mierdel P, Kaemmerer M, Krinke HE, Seiler T. Effects of photorefractive keratectomy and cataract surgery on ocular optical errors of higher order. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1999;237:725-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/s004170050303
  15. Moreno-Barriuso E, Merayo-Loves J, Marcos S, et al. Ocular aberrations before and after myopic corneal refractive surgery: LASIK-induced changes measured with laser ray tracing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42: 1396-403
  16. Maria Regina Chalita, Sai Chavala, Meng Xu, Ronald R. Krueger. Wavefront analysis in post-LASIK eyes and its correlation with visual symptoms, refraction, and topography. Ophthalmolology 2004;111;447-53 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.06.022
  17. Williams D, Yoon G, Guirao A, et al. How far can we extend the limits of human vision? In: MacRae S, Krueger R, Applegate R, eds. Customized Corneal Ablation. 1st ed. Thorofare NJ: Slack Incorporated, 2001; v. 1. chap. 2
  18. Vinciguerra P, Camesasca FI, Randazzo A. One-year results of butterfly laser epithelial keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 2003;19:S223-6
  19. Autrata R, Rehurek J. Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for myopia : two-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:661-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01897-7
  20. Pallikaris IG, Papatzanaki ME, Siganos DS, Tsilimbaris MK. A corneal flap technique for laser in situ keratomileusis; human studies. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:1699-1702 https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1991.01080120083031
  21. Scerrati E. Laser in situ keratomileusis vs laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASIK vs LASEK). J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;17:S219-S221
  22. Kim HJ, Joo CK. Comparison of anterior and posterior corneal surface change after laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2004;45:26-31
  23. Prisant O, Calderon N, Chastang P, et al. Reliability of pachymetric measurements using Orbscan after excimer refractive surgery. Ophthalmology 2003;110:511-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01298-8
  24. Seiler T, Kaemmrer M, Mierdel P, et al. Ocular optical aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy for myopic astigmatism. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:17-21 https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.118.1.17
  25. Pallikaris IG, Kymionis GD, Panagopoulou SI, et al. Induced optical aberrations following formation of a laser in situ keratomileusis flap. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28: 1737-41 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01507-9
  26. Zadok D, Carrillo C, Missiroli F, et al. The effect of corneal flap on optical aberrations. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138:190-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2004.03.032
  27. Buzzonetti L, Iarossi G, Valente P, et al. Comparison of wavefront aberration changes in the anterior corneal surface after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis: preliminary study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:1929-33 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.01.036
  28. Mohan RR, Hutcheon AE, Choi R, et al. Apoptosis, necrosis, proliferation, and my fibroblast generation in the stroma following LASIK and PRK. Exp Eye Res 2001;76:71-87
  29. Vongthongsri A, Phusiphoykai N, Naripthapan P, et al. Comparison of wavefront-guided customized ablation vs conventional ablation in laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 2002;18:S332-5
  30. Mrochen M, Kaemmerer M, Seiler T. Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: early results in three eyes. J Refract Surg 2000;16:116-21
  31. Aizawa D, Shimizu K, Komatsu M, et al. Clinical outcomes of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: 6-month follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:1507-13 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00472-3
  32. Chalita MR, Krueger RR. Correlation of aberrations with visual acuity and symptoms. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2004;17:135-42 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ohc.2004.02.008