Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparison of Meat Characteristics between Duck and Chicken Breast

  • Ali, Md. Shawkat (Division of Applied Life Science, Graduate School, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kang, Geun-Ho (Poultry Research Division, National Livestock Research Institute, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Yang, Han-Sul (Division of Applied Life Science, Graduate School, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Jeong, Jin-Yeon (Division of Applied Life Science, Graduate School, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Hwang, Young-Hwa (Division of Applied Life Science, Graduate School, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Park, Gu-Boo (Division of Applied Life Science, Graduate School, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Joo, Seon-Tea (Division of Applied Life Science, Graduate School, Gyeongsang National University)
  • Received : 2006.10.19
  • Accepted : 2007.02.20
  • Published : 2007.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Twenty four broilers (Ross) and 24 ducklings (Cherry berry) aged 45days were stunned and killed by conventional neck cut to evaluate the meat characteristics and fatty acid composition of breast meat. Breast meats were removed from each carcass at different post-mortem times. After complete processing, the breast meats were then placed in a polythene bag and kept in a cold storage room at $4^{\circ}C$ for 7 days. The pH of meat samples at different post-mortem times, and meat characteristics and fatty composition at different storage times were evaluated. No significant differences were found in pH at different post-mortem times except at 30 min postmortem, where duck breast showed significantly lower pH than chicken breast. As expected, duck breast meat had significantly higher redness (a*), but lower lightness (L*) value compared to chicken breast. During whole storage time, the a* value remained constant in duck breast. Cooking loss (%) was higher in duck breast compared to chicken breast during the whole storage time. Shear force decreased with increasing storage time in both chicken and duck breast meat, moreover, it decreased rapidly in duck breast compared to chicken breast. The TBARS values increased with increasing storage time in both duck breast and chicken breast meat and was significantly higher in duck breast. The fatty acids (%) C14:0, C16:0, C16:1, C18:2 and C18:3 were significantly higher while C18:0 was significantly lower in duck breast compared to chicken. SFA was increased, while USFA and MUSFA decreased only in duck breast during the 7 day storage time.

Keywords

References

  1. Alvarado, C. Z. and A. R. Sams. 2000. The influence of postmortem electrical stimulation on rigor mortis development, calpastatin activity, and tenderness in broiler and duck pectoralis. Poult. Sci. 79:1364-1368. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.9.1364
  2. AOAC. 1995. Officials methods of analysis, 16th Editions. Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Washington, DC.
  3. Berri, C., N. Wacrenier, N. Millet and E. Le Bihan-Duval. 2001. Effect of selection for improved body composition on muscle and meat characteristics of broilers from experimental and commercial lines. Poult. Sci. 80:833-838. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.7.833
  4. Biswas, S., A. Chakraborty and S. Sarkar. 2006. Comparison among the qualities of patties prepared from chicken broiler, spent hen and duck meats. J. Poult. Sci. 43:180-186. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.43.180
  5. Castellini, C., A. D. Bosco, C. Mugnai and M. Pedrazzoli. 2006. Comparison of two chicken genotypes organically reared: oxidative stability and other qualitative traits of the meat. Italian J. Anim. Sci. 5:29-42. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2006.29
  6. Feldhusen, F., A. Warnatz, R. Erdmann and S. Wenzel. 1995. Influence of storage time on parameters of colour stability on Beef. Meat Sci. 40:235-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(94)00048-C
  7. Folch, J., M. Lees and G. H. Sloane-Stanley. 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J. Bio. Chem. 226:497-507.
  8. Insausti, K., M. J. Beriain, A. Purroy, P. Alberti, L. Lizaso and B. Hernandez. 1999. Color stability of beef from different Spanish native cattle breeds stored under vacuum and modified atmosphere. Meat Sci. 53:241-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00063-7
  9. Joseph, J. K., O. O. Balogun and M. A. Famuyiwa. 1992. Carcass evaluation and organoleptic assessment of some selected Nigerian birds. Bulletin of Animal Health and Production in Africa, 40:97-102.
  10. Mazanowski, A., T. Kisiel and E. Gornowicz. 2003. Carcass quality, meat traits and chemical composition of meat in ducks of paternal strains A44 and A55. Animal Science Papers and Reports, Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Poland, 21:251-263.
  11. Morgan, J. B., J. W. Savell, D. S. Hale, R. K. Miller, D. B. Griffin, H. R. Cross and S. D. Shackelford. 1991. National Beef Tenderness Survey. J. Anim. Sci. 69:3274. https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.6983274x
  12. Pettersen, M. K., M. B. Mielnik, T. Eie, G. Skrede and A. Nilsson. 2004. Lipid oxidation in frozen, mechanically deboned turkey meat as affected by packaging and storage conditions. Poult. Sci. 83:1240-1248. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.7.1240
  13. Pingel, H. 1997. Perspective of the production of waterfowl. In: 11th European Symp. On Waterfowl, Nantes, France, 128-134.
  14. Richardson, R. I. and J. M. Jones. 1987. The effects of salt concentration and pH upon water-binding, water-holding and protein extractability of turkey meat. Intl. J. Food Sci. Technol. 22:683-692. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1987.tb00537.x
  15. Russell, E. A., A. Lynch, K. Galvin, P. B. Lynch and J. P. Kerry. 2003. Quality of raw, frozen and cooked duck meat as affected by dietary fat and $\alpha$-tocopheryl acetate supplementation. Intl. J. Poult. Sci. 2:324-334. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2003.324.334
  16. SAS. 1997. SAS Software for PC. SAS Institude Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
  17. Sikorskia, Z. E. 1978. Protein changes in muscle foods due to freezing and frozen storage. International Journal of Refrigeration, 1:173-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-7007(78)90094-4
  18. Smith, D. P. and D. L. Fletcher. 1992. Post-mortem biochemistry of Pekin ducklings and broiler chicken pectoralis muscle. Poult. Sci. 71:1768-1772. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0711768
  19. Smith, D. P., D. L. Fletcher, R. J. Buhr and R. S. Beyer. 1993. Pekin ducklings and broiler chicken pectoralis muscle structure and composition. Poult. Sci. 72:202-208. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0720202
  20. Yang, H. S., S. S. Moon, J. Y. Jeong, S. G. Choi, S. T. Joo and G. B. Park. 2006. Effect of sodium bicarbonate injection in pre-rigor porcine M. Longissimus lumborum on pork quality. Asia-Aust. J Anim. Sci. 19:898-904. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.898
  21. Zeidler, G. 1998. Poultry products in the 21 st century. In: Proc. 10th Europ. Poultry Conf., Jerusalem, Israel, 1:132-141.

Cited by

  1. Effect of Dietary Metabolizable Energy and Crude Protein Concentrations on Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Korean Native Ducks vol.39, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2012.39.3.167
  2. Comparison of Meat Characteristics between Korean Native Duck and Imported Commercial Duck Raised under Identical Rearing and Feeding Condition vol.33, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2013.33.1.89
  3. Effect of Dietary Crude Protein and Amino Acid Contents on Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics in Korean Native Ducks vol.40, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2013.40.4.351
  4. Changes in the phospholipid fraction of intramuscular fat from pork loin (fresh and marinated) with different irradiation and packaging during storage vol.64, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.084312
  5. Razor blade shear method for evaluating duck breast meat and tendon texture vol.23, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2013-00905
  6. Effects of Sucrose Stearate Addition on the Quality Improvement of Ready-To-Eat Samgyetang During Storage at 25℃ vol.34, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2014.34.5.683
  7. Effect of number and washing solutions on functional properties of surimi-like material from duck meat vol.51, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0510-1
  8. Assessment of Breed- and Sex-based Variation in Flavor-related Compounds of Duck Meat in Korea vol.42, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2014.42.1.41
  9. A review of canola meal as an alternative feed ingredient for ducks vol.57, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40781-015-0062-4
  10. Studies on the quality of duck meat sausages during refrigeration vol.5, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3743-7
  11. Economic Analysis and Egg Yolk Cholesterol of Local Ducks Fed a Salvinia molesta and Brotia costula Combination vol.16, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2017.684.689
  12. Understanding brassinosteroid-regulated mechanisms to improve stress tolerance in plants: a critical review vol.24, pp.19, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9163-6
  13. Rapid nondestructive evaluation of duck meat pH and color using visible and near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy vol.50, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/00387010.2017.1358183
  14. Carcass composition and quality of meat from Pekin ducks finished on diets with varying levels of whole wheat grain vol.57, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15810
  15. Fattening performance and meat quality of Pekin ducks under different rearing systems vol.74, pp.01, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1017/S004393391700099X
  16. Meat characteristics from four different cutting parts of Cherry Valley duck vol.192, pp.2261-236X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819203056
  17. Exogenous easily extractable glomalin-related soil protein improves drought tolerance of trifoliate orange vol.64, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2018.1432854
  18. Polynomial surface fitting and artificial neural networks-based analysis of the storage days and garlic extract supplementation dependent microbial growths in minced raw chicken meat pp.01458892, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.13882
  19. Leaves of Moringa, Rosemary and Olive as a Phytogenic Feed Additives in Muscovy Duck diets vol.22, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2019.1.7
  20. Carcass composition and selected meat quality traits of Pekin ducks from genetic resources flocks pp.1525-3171, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez073
  21. Quality of Duck Breast and Leg Meat after Chilling Carcasses in Water at 0, 10 or $20^{\circ}C$ vol.20, pp.12, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.1895
  22. Effects of Free-range Farming on Carcass and Meat Qualities of Black-feathered Taiwan Native Chicken vol.21, pp.8, 2008, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.80080
  23. Comparative Study of Intramuscular Phospholipid Molecular Species in Traditional Chinese Duck Meat Products vol.22, pp.10, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.90134
  24. Possibility of Making Low-fat Sausages from Duck Meat with Addition of Rice Flour vol.24, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.10095
  25. Effect of Sex, Bird Size and Marination on Duck Breast Meat Quality vol.14, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2015.191.195
  26. The effect of aging on the quality of Semimembranosus muscle from Hanwoo vol.43, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20160008
  27. The effect of feeding with hemp and Camelina cakes on the fatty acid profile of duck muscles vol.61, pp.3, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-61-293-2018
  28. Changes in physicochemical characteristics and oxidative stability of pre- and post-rigor frozen chicken muscles during cold storage vol.56, pp.11, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-03941-0
  29. A comparative study of carcass characteristics and meat quality in genetic resources Pekin ducks and commercial crossbreds vol.32, pp.11, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0790
  30. Technological investigation into duck meat and its products - a potential alternative to chicken vol.75, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1017/s004393391900062x
  31. Effect of Dietary Protein Sources Substituting Soybean Meal on Growth Performance and Meat Quality in Ducks vol.10, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10010133
  32. Influence of E‐beam irradiation on microbiological and physicochemical properties and fatty acid profile of frozen duck meat vol.8, pp.2, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1386
  33. Investigation of Taste-Related Compounds and Antioxidative Profiles of Retorted Samgyetang Made from Fresh and Dried Cordyceps militaris Mushrooms vol.40, pp.5, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2020.e53
  34. Ducks’ Growth, Meat Quality, Bone Strength, and Jejunum Strength Depend on Zeolite in Feed and Long-Term Factors vol.11, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041015
  35. Addition of fermented catfish waste into ration for increasing performance of Drake in Growth Period vol.748, pp.1, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/748/1/012005
  36. The Effect of Vegetable oils (Palm Oil, Canola, Coconut and Soybean Oil) on the Ration of Slaughter Weight, Carcass Weight, Carcass Percentage, and Abdominal fat Percentage of male ducks vol.828, pp.1, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/828/1/012014
  37. The effect of various vegetable oils in diets on the percentage of internal organ weights in local male ducks vol.828, pp.1, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/828/1/012015
  38. Impact of frozen storage on oxidation changes of some components in goose meat vol.101, pp.1, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101517