KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research (대한토목학회논문집)

Korean Society of Civil Engeneers (대한토목학회)
권호 표지

Estimation of Displacement Amplification Factors Considering Hysteretic Behavior of Structural System and Earthquake Characteristics

비탄성 이력응답 및 지진특성을 반영한 변위증폭계수의 산정

Song, Jong-Keol;Jin, He-Shou
송종걸;김학수

  • Published : 20070700

⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Displacement amplification factor can be used to estimate inelastic displacement demands from elastic displacement demands. The simple formula for displacement amplification factor considering hysteretic behavior of structural system and earthquake characteristics is proposed. And the effects of several parameters such as displacement ductility, strain hardening ratio, period, characteristics of earthquakes and hysteretic models for the displacement amplification factor are evaluated. Accuracy of the proposed formula is evaluated by comparing the displacement amplification factors estimated by existing and proposed formula with those calculated from inelastic time history analysis. The displacement amplification factors by proposed formulas provide a good agreement with those calculated by inelastic time history analysis.

Keywords

References

  1. 송종결, 남왕현, 정영화(2006) 등가단자유도 방법의 영향을 고려한 다경간 교량의 내진성능 평가를 위한 비탄성 정적해석, 대한토목학회논문집, 대한토목학회, 제26권 제3A호, pp. 473-484
  2. 송종걸, 김학수(2007) 근거리 및 원거리 지진에 대한 비선형 구조물의 강도감소계수 산정, 대한토목학회논문집, 대한토목학회, 제27권 제3A호, pp. 321-337
  3. FEMA. NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA 273), and NEHRP commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA 274). Washington (DC): Building Seismic Safety Council; 1997
  4. Applied Technology Council. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings-volume 1 (ATC 40). Report No. SSC 96-01. Redwood City (CA), USA; 1996
  5. ASCE-FEMA. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA 356), Washington, DC, USA; 2000
  6. Applied Technology Council. Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures (FEMA 440), ATC-55 Project, Redwood city, California, USA; 2004
  7. Applied Technology Council (1995) Structural Response Modification Factors. ATC-19 Report, Redwood city, California
  8. Akkar, S.D. and Miranda, E. (2005) Statistical evaluation of approximate methods for estimating maximum deformation demands on existing structures, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 1, pp. 160-172 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:1(160)
  9. Chopra, A.K. and Chintanapakdee, C. (2004) Inelastic deformation ratios for design and evaluation of structures: single-degree-of freedom bilinear systems, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 9, pp, 1309-1319 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:9(1309)
  10. EIghadamsi, F.E. and Mohraz, B., (1987) Inelastic earthquake spectra, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 15, pp. 91-104 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290150107
  11. Fischinger, M., Beg, D., and Isakovic, T. (2004) Performance based assessment-from general methodologies to specific implementations, International Workshop on PBSD, New York, US
  12. Hidalgo, P.A. and Arias, A. (1990) New Chilean code for earthquake- resistant design of buildings, Proc. 4th Us. Nat. Conl Earthquake Engrg., Palm Springs, California, Vol. 2, pp. 927-936
  13. Mahmoud M. Hachem Bispec: a nonlinear spectral analysis program that performs bi-direction dynamic time-history analysis of pendulum system. University of California at Berkeley
  14. Miranda, E. (1993) Site-dependent strength reduction factors, J. of Struct. Engrg., ASCE, Vol. 119, No. 12
  15. Miranda, E. and Bertero, V.V. (1994) Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake resistant design, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 357-379 https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585778
  16. Miranda, E. (1993) Evaluation of site-dependent inelastic seismic design spectra, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 119, No. 5, pp. 1319-1338 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:5(1319)
  17. Miranda, E. and Ruiz-Garcia, J. (2001) Evaluation of approximate methods to estimate maximum inelastic displacement demands, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 31, pp. 539-560 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.143
  18. Miranda, E. (2000) Inelastic displacement ratios for structures on firm sites, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 126, No. 10, pp. 1150-1159 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:10(1150)
  19. Nassar, A.A. and Krawinkler, H. (1991) Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems, Report No. 95, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford university, Stanford, California
  20. Newmark, N.M. and Hall, W.J (1973) Seismic design criteria for nuclear reactor facilities, Report No. 46, Building Practices for Disaster Mitigation, National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce, pp. 209-236
  21. Qi, X. and Moehle, J.P. (1991) Displacement design approach for reinforced concrete structures subjected to earthquakes, Report No. UCB/EERC-91/02, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California at Berkeley, 186 pp
  22. Ruiz-Garcia, J. and Miranda, E. (2003) Inelastic displacement ratios for evaluation of exiting structures, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 32, pp. 1237-1258 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.271
  23. Ruiz-Garcia, J. and Miranda, E. (2006) Inelastic displacement ratios for evaluation of structures built on soft soil sites, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 35, pp. 679-694 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.552
  24. Song, J.K. and Pincheira, J.A. (2000) Spectral displacement demands of stiffness and strength degrading systems, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 817-851 https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586141
  25. Vidic, T., Fajfar, P. and Fischinger, M. (1992) A procedure for determining consistent inelastic design spectra, Proc. Workshop on Nonlinear Seismic Analysis of RC Structures, Bled, Slovenia
  26. Vidic, T., Fajfar, P. and Fischinger, M. (1994) Consistent inelastic design spectra: strength and displacement, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 23, pp. 507-521 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290230504