Proteomic Analysis of Differentially Expressed Proteins in Human Lung Cells Following Formaldehyde Treatment

  • Jeon, Yu-Mi (Department of Biotechnology, SoonChunHyang University) ;
  • Ryu, Jae-Chun (Cellular and Molecular Toxicology Laboratory, Korea Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Lee, Mi-Young (Department of Biotechnology, SoonChunHyang University)
  • Published : 2007.12.31

Abstract

Chronic formaldehyde inhalation studies have suggested its relativity to teratogenicity, cancer incidence, neurodegenerative and vascular disorders. Many toxicological data on the formaldehyde toxicity are available, but proteomic results showing complete protein profiles are limited. Therefore, alterations of protein expression patterns upon formaldehyde treatment were investigated in the human lung epithelial cell line. Differentially expressed proteins following formaldehyde treatment were analyzed on 2-dimensional gels, and further analyzed by MALDI-TOF to identify the proteins. Among the identified proteins, 24 proteins were notably up-regulated and 6 proteins were down-regulated. In particular, cytoskeleton related protein named vinculin and Rho GDP dissociation inhibitor which plays a key role in apoptosis increased remarkably.

Keywords

References

  1. International Agency for Research on Cancer, On-line database, December (2006)
  2. Hester, S. D. et al. Formaldehyde-induced gene expression in F344 rat nasal respiratory epithelium. Toxicology 187:13-24 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-483X(03)00008-8
  3. Hauptmann, M. et al. Mortality from solid cancers among workers in formaldehyde industries. Am J Epidemiol 159:1117-1130 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh174
  4. Vaughan, T. L. et al. Occupational exposure to formaldehyde and wood dust and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Occup Envion Med 57:376-384 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.57.6.376
  5. Fella, K. et al. Use of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in predictive toxicology: identification of potential early protein biomarkers in chemically induced hepatocarcinogenesis. Proteomics 5:1914-1927 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200401067
  6. Tyihak, E. et al. Formaldehyde promotes and inhibits the proliferation of cultured tumour and endothelial cells. Cell Prolif 34:135-141 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2184.2001.00206.x
  7. Marx, C. J., Christoserdova, L. & Lidstrom, M. E. Formaldehyde- detoxifying role of the tetrahydromethanopterin-linked pathway in Methylobacterium extorquens AM1. Bacteriol 185:7160-7168 (2003)
  8. Walkup. A. S. & Appling, D. R. Enzymatic characterization of human mitochondrial C1-tetrahydrofolate synthase. Arch Biochem Biophys 442:196-205 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2005.08.007
  9. Sanghani, P. C., Robinson, H., Bosron, W. F. & Hurley, T. D. Human glutathione-dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase. Structures of apo, binary, and inhibitory ternary complexes. Biochemistry 41:10778-10786 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1021/bi0257639
  10. Laouini, D. et al. COX-2 inhibition enhances the TH2 immune response to epicutaneous sensitization. J Allergy Clin Immunol 116:390-396 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2005.03.042
  11. Takahashi, S. et al. Prospective study of clinical symptoms and skin test reactions in medical students exposed to formaldehyde gas. J Dermatol 34:283-289 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1346-8138.2007.00274.x
  12. Ayaki, H., Lee, M. J., Sumino, K. & Nishino, H. Different cytoprotective effect of antioxidants and change in the iron regulatory system in rodent cells exposed to paraquat or formaldehyde. Toxicology 208:73-79 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2004.11.008
  13. Saito, Y., Nishio, K., Yoshida, Y. & Niki, E. Cytotoxic effect of formaldehyde with free radicals via increment of cellular reactive oxygen species. Toxicology 210:235-245 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2005.02.006
  14. Quievryn, G. & Zhitkovich, A. Loss of DNA-protein crosslinks from formaldehyde-exposed cells occurs through spontaneous hydrolysis and an active repair process linked to proteosome function. Carcinogenesis 21:1573-1580 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/21.8.1573
  15. Zhong, W. & Que Hee, S. S. Formaldehyde-induced DNA adducts as biomarkers of in vitro human nasal epithelial cell exposure to formaldehyde. Mutat Res 563:13-24 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2004.05.012
  16. Cheng, G. et al. Reactions of formaldehyde plus acetaldehyde with deoxyguanosine and DNA: formation of cyclic deoxyguanosine adducts and formalde-hyde crosslinks. Chem Res Toxicol 16:145-152 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1021/tx025614r
  17. Kim, Y. J. et al. Genotoxicity and identification of differentially expressed genes of formaldehyde in human jurkat cells. Mol Cell Toxicol 1:230-236 (2005)
  18. Speit, G. & Merk, O. Evaluation of mutagenic effects of formaldehyde in vitro: detection of crosslinks and mutations in mouse lymphoma cells. Mutagenesis 17:183-187 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/17.3.183
  19. Dowling, V. A. & Sheehan, D. Proteomics as a route to identification of toxicity targets in environmental toxicology. Proteomics 6:5597-5604 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200600274
  20. Metz, B. et al. Identification of formaldehyde-induced modifications in proteins: reactions with model peptides. J Bio Chem 279:6235-6243 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M310752200
  21. Wonsey, D. R., Zeller, K.I. & Dang, C.V. The c-Myc target gene PRDX3 is required for mitochondrial homeostasis and neoplastic transformation. Proc Nat Acad Sci 99:6649-6654 (2002)
  22. Leffers, H. et al. Identification of two human Rho GDP dissociation inhibitor proteins whose overexpression leads to distruption of the actin cytoskeleton. Exp Cell Res 209:165-174 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1006/excr.1993.1298
  23. Togawa. A. et al. Progressive impairment of kidneys and reproductive organs in mice lacking Rho GDI$\alpha$. Oncogene 18:5373-5380 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1202921
  24. Hu, K. et al. Differential transmission of actin motion within focal adhesion. Science 315:111-115 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1135085
  25. Ahmad, M. K., Roderick, J. F. & Mauro, P. An overview of the effects of annexin 1 on cells involved in the inflammatory process. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 100:39-48 (2005)
  26. Buckingham, J. C. et al. Annexin 1, glucocorticoids and the neuroendocrine immune interface. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1088:396-409 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1366.002
  27. Fukuoka, S. I., Kern, H., Kazuki, S. R. & Ikeda, Y. Cloning and characterization of ZAP36, an annexinlike, zymogen granule membrane associated protein, in exocrine pancreas. Biochim Biophys Acta 1575: 148-152 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4781(02)00299-3
  28. Damsker, J. M., Bukrinsky. M. I. & Constant, S. L. Preferential chemotaxis of activated human CD4+ T cells by extracellular cyclophilin A. J Leukoc Biol 82: 613-618 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.0506317
  29. Lee, S. J. et al. Crystal structures of human DJ-1 and Escherichia coli Hsp31, which share an evolutionarily conserved domain. J Biol Chem 278:44552-44559 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M304517200
  30. Kim, Y. K., Yoo, W. I., Lee, S. H. & Lee, M. Y. Proteomic analysis of cadmium-induced protein profiled alterations from marine alga Nannochloropsis oculata. Ecotoxicology 14:589-596 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-005-0009-5