Journal of the Korean Society of Food Culture (한국식생활문화학회지)

Korean Society of Food Culture (한국식생활문화학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Dietary Ultra Finely Pulverized Rice Starch on Growth Performance and Development of Small Intestine

초미세 분쇄 쌀전분의 섭취가 성장기 Sprague-Dawley 흰쥐의 성장 및 장세포 발달에 미치는 영향

  • Published : 2007.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Male weanling Sprague Dawley rats were used to evaluate the effect of dietary rice starch with different particle size on growth performance, intestinal function and proliferation. There were two dietary treatment: rice starch (RS), ultra finely pulverized rice starch with less than $15{\mu}m$ size (PRS). They were eight rats per treatment. In vitro digestibility, body weight change and organs weight were evaluated. Serum GPT, GOT and blood urea nitrogen were analyzed. Transit time, short chain fatty acid contents of cecum, and cell proliferation of duodenum and jejunum were measured. In vitro digestibility of PRS was higher than that of RS. Rats fed ultra finely pulverized rice starch for 3 weeks grew faster than rats fed rice starch. PRS group has higher weights of liver, kidney, spleen and epididymal fat pad, perhaps as a result of increased digestibility. GPT and GOT were not different between two groups. Blood urea nitrogen was higher in RS-fed rats than that of PRS-fed rats. Feeding ultra finely pulverized rice starch resulted in a proliferation of duodenum significantly. These results suggest that ultra finely pulverized rice starch increases the growth performance in weanling animals with reduced number of cells in the cell cycle of small intestine.

Keywords

References

  1. Aumaitre A, Peiniau J, Madec F. 1995. Digestive adaptation after weaning and nutritional consequences in the piglet. Pig News Inf. 16: 73N-79N
  2. Berry CS 1986. Resistant starch: formation and measurement of starch that survives exhaustive digestion with amylolytic enzymes during the determination of dietary fibre. J. Cereal Sci. 4: 301-314 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-5210(86)80034-0
  3. Bjorck I, Gunnarsson A, Ostergard K. 1989. A study of native and chemically modified potato starch II. : Digestibility in the rat intestinal tract. Starch-Starke 41: 128-134 https://doi.org/10.1002/star.19890410403
  4. Brunsgaard G, Bach-Knudsen KE, Eggum BO. 1995. The influence of the period of adaptation on the digestibility of diets containing different types of indigestible polysaccharides in rats. Br. J. Nutr. 74: 833-848 https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19950010
  5. Carre B, Idi A, Maisonnier S, Melcion J-P, Oury F-X, Gomez J, Pluchard P. 2002. Relationships between digestibilities of food components and characteristics of wheats (Triticum aestivum) introduced as the only cereal source in a broiler diet. Br. Poultry Sci. 43: 404-415 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660120103684
  6. Chang MJ, Kim MH. 2003. Comparative growth performance and physiological function of physically modified rice starch and gelatinized rice starch in growing rats. Kor. J. Food Cult. 18: 592-600
  7. COMA Committee on Medical Aspects of Food Policy. 1994. Weaning and the weaning diet. Rep. Health Soc. Subj. 45 : 1-113
  8. Englyst HN, Cummings JH, 1985 Digestion of the polysaccharides of some cereal foods in the human small intestine. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 42: 778-787 https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/42.5.778
  9. Englyst HN. Cummings JH. 1990. Non-starch polysaccharides (dietary fibre) and resistant starch. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 270: 205-225
  10. Grand RJ, Watkins JB, Torti FM. 1976. Development of the human gastrointestinal tract: a review. Gastroenterology 70: 790-810
  11. Hoebler C, Karinthi A, Chiron H, Champ M, Barry JL. 1999. Bioavailability of starch in bread rich in amylose: metabolic responses in healthy subjects and starch structure. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 53: 360-366 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600718
  12. Jenkins DJ, Wolever TM, Taylor RH, Baker H, Fielder H, Baldwin JM, Bowling AC, Newman HC, Jenkins AL, Goff DV. 1981. Glycemic index of foods: a phsyiological basis for carbohydrate exchange. Am. J Clin. Nutr. 34: 362-366 https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/34.3.362
  13. Kim SY, Lee SR, In vitro digestibility of chemically modified starches and ramen starches. 1994. Kor. J. Food Sci. Technol. 26: 475-478
  14. Krog N, Olesen SK, Toemases H, Joensson T. 1989. Retrogradation of the starch fraction in wheat bread. Cereal Foods World 34: 281-285
  15. Le Blay G, Michel C, Blottiere HM, Cherbut C. 1999. Enhancement of butyrate production in the rat caecolonic tract by long-term ingestion of resistant potato starch. Br. J. Nutr. 82: 419-426 https://doi.org/10.1017/S000711459900166X
  16. Liu H, Harold C, Ramsden L. Functional properties and enzymatic digestibility of cationic and cross-linked cationic ae.wx. and normal maize starch. 1999. J. Agric. Food Chem. 47: 2523-2528 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf9811471
  17. Medel P, Salado S, , de Blas JC, Mateos GG. 1999. Processed cereals in diets for early-weaned piglets. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 82: 145-156 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00111-X
  18. Medel P, Garcia M, Lazaro R, de Blas C, Mateos GG. 2000. Particle size and heat treatment of barley in diets for earlyweaned piglets. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 84: 13-21 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00111-5
  19. Patridge GG, Gill BP. 1993. New approaches with pig weaner diets: In: Garnsworthy PC, Cole DJA (Eds) Recent advances in animal nutrition. Nottingham University Press. UK. pp 221-248
  20. Reville M, Grosse F, Kachellhoffer J, Doffoel, M, Raul F. 1991. Ileal compensation for age-dependent loss of jejunal function in rats. J. Nutr. 121: 498-503 https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/121.4.498
  21. Sangild PT. 2006. Gut responses to enteral nutrition in preterm infants and animals. Exp. Biol. Med. 231: 1695-1711 https://doi.org/10.1177/153537020623101106
  22. Schutte B, Reynders MMJ. Bosman FT, Blijham GH. 1987. Studies with antibromodeoxyuridine antibodies II: Simultaneous immunocytochemical detection of antigen expression and DNA synthesis by in vivo labeling of mouse intestinal mucosa. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 35: 371-374 https://doi.org/10.1177/35.3.3546484
  23. Stephen AM, Haddad AC, Phillips SF. 1983. Passage of carbohydrate into the colon. Direct measurements in humans. Gastroenterology 85: 589-595
  24. Stephen M-M, van Camp J, Mamiro PRS, Ooghe W, Kolsteren P, Huyghebaert A. 2002. Evaluation of the nutritional characteristics of a finger millet based complementary food. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50: 3030-3036 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf011008a
  25. Svihus B, Uhlen AK, Harstad OM. 2005. Effect of starch granule structure, associated components and processing on nutritive value of cereal starch: A review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 122: 303-320 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.02.025
  26. Vestergaard EM, Danielsen V, Jacobsen EE, Rasmussen V. 1990. Heat treated cereals for piglets. Statens Husdyrbrugsforsoeg, Foulum 674: 71
  27. Wiseman J. Variations in starch digestibility in non-ruminants. 2006. Anim. Feed Sci . Technol. 130: 66-77 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.01.018
  28. Williams BA, Verstegen MWA, Tamminga S. 2001. Fermentation in the large intestine of single-stomached animals and its relationship to animal health. Nutr. Res. Rev. 14: 207-227 https://doi.org/10.1079/NRR200127
  29. Würsch P, del Vedovo S, Kroellreutter B. 1986. Cell structure and starch nature as key determinant of the digestion rate of starch in legumes. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 43: 25-29 https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/43.1.25
  30. Yanai T, Matsumoto C, Takashima H, Yoshida K, Sakai H, Isowa K, Iwasaki T, Sato Y, Masegi T. 1996. Immunohistochemical demonstration of S-phase cells by antibromodeoxyuridine monoclonal antibody in cattle tissues. J. Comp. Path. 114: 265-272 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9975(96)80048-X
  31. Zabielski R, Le Huerou-Luron I, Guilloteau P. 1999. Development of gastrointestinal and pancreatic functions in mammalians(mainly bovine and porcine species): influence of age and ingested food. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 39: 5-26 https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:19990101