DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Effectiveness of Book Selection at the Academic Library : a Case Study on K Academic Library

대학도서관에서의 도서 선정 주체에 따른 도서 선정 효과성 비교 - K 대학도서관 사례를 중심으로 -

  • 황옥경 (서울여자대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Published : 2007.03.30

Abstract

The Purpose of the study was to research the effectiveness of book selection each by faculty, librarians and students. For this purpose, the study performed a case study on K Academic Library to compare the circulation rate of the books selected by each group. According to the book selection and circulation records of 7,717 titles (16,809 volumes) during the last 3 years. it was shown that about 76% of the books were selected by librarians. With regard to the rate of books with more than 1time circulation record, books selected by librarians showed the highest with about 85%. With regard to the circulation rate of books with circulation record, books selected by students showed the highest.

본 연구의 목적은 국내 K 대학도서관을 대상으로 사례연구를 실시하여 대학도서관에서의 도서 선정 주체에 따른 도서 선정의 효과성을 비교 분석하는 데 있다. 이를 위하여 사례 도서관으로부터 최근 3년간의 단행본 수서 및 대출 기록을 바탕으로 7,717종(16,809권)을 조사 대상 도서로 선정하였고 이에 대한 교수, 사서, 학생 3집단의 도서 선정 및 대출 현황을 조사 분석하였다. 연구 결과사서에 의해 선정된 도서의 비율이 전체의 약 76%로서 가장 높은 비율을 차지하였으며 그 다음 학생, 교수의 순으로 도서 선정 비율이 높게 나타났다. 각 신분별로 선정된 도서를 대상으로 미대출 도서의 비율을 조사한 결과 사서에 의해 선정된 도서의 미대출 도서 비율이 가장 낮게 나타났다. 1회 이상 대출 이력이 있는 도서를 대상으로 대출비율을 조사한 결과에서는 학생에 의해 선정된 도서의 대출 비율이 가장 높게 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Biggs, Mary. 1981. 'Sources of Tension and Conflict between Librarians and Faculty.' Journal of Higher Education, 52(2): 182-201 https://doi.org/10.2307/1981090
  2. Fonfa, R. 1998. 'From faculty to librarian materials selection: An element in the professionalization of librarianship.' In T.F. Mech and G.B. McCabe(Eds.), Leadership and Academic Librarians. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood. Quoted in Sowards, Steven. 2002. 'Rates of Participation by Faculty Book Selectors in a College Library.' [cited 2006.12.2].
  3. Hardesty, L. 1986. 'Book selection for undergraduate libraries: A study of faculty attitudes. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 12(1): 19-25
  4. Hurt, Charlene S., Laura O. Rein, Maureen S. Connors, John C. Walsh, and Anna C. Wu. 1995. 'Collection Development Strategies for a University Center Library.' College & Research Libraries, 56(6): 487-495 https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_56_06_487
  5. Jenkins, Paul O., 1996. 'Faculty priorities: where does material selection stand?' Collection Building, 15(1): 19-20 https://doi.org/10.1108/01604959610105922
  6. Massman, V.F. and Olson, D.R. 1971. 'Book selection: A national plan for small academic libraries.' College and Research Libraries, 32(4): 271-279 https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_32_04_271
  7. Miller, W. and D. Stephen Rockwood. 1979. 'Collection development from a college perspective.' College and Research Li braries, 40(4): 318-324 https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_40_04_318
  8. Millson-Matula, C. 1985. 'The effectiveness of book selection agents in a small academic library.' College and Research Libraries, 46(6): 504-510 https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_46_06_504
  9. Neville, Robert, James Williams III, and Caroline C. Hunt. 1998. 'Faculty-Library Teamwork in Book Ordering.' College and Research Libraries, 59(6): 523-532 https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.59.6.523
  10. Sandler, M. 1984. 'Organizing effective faculty participation in collection development.' Collection Management, 6(3): 63-73 https://doi.org/10.1300/J105v06n01_07
  11. Sowards, Steven. 2002. 'Rates of Participation by Faculty Book Selectors in a College Library.' [cited 2006.12.2].
  12. Vidor, David L. and Elizabeth Futas. 1988. 'Effective Collection Developers: Librarians or Faculty?' Library Resources and Technical Services, 32(2): 127-136
  13. Yang, Eveline L. 1991. 'Psychology Collection Review: A Cooperative Project between Librarians and Departmental Faculty Members.' Collection Management, 13(3): 43-55

Cited by

  1. An Analysis on the Effectiveness of Book Selection and Circulation After Introducing to Subject Librarian vol.30, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.3.229