Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of time-dependent antimicrobial effect of sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC) on Enterococcus faecalis in the root canal

이염화이소시아뉼산나트륨 제재의 근관 내 사용 시 시간에 따른 E. faecalis에 대한 항균성 평가

  • Kim, Hye-Jeong (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University) ;
  • Park, Se-Hee (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University) ;
  • Cho, Kyung-Mo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Woo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University)
  • 김혜정 (강릉대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 박세희 (강릉대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 조경모 (강릉대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 김진우 (강릉대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Published : 2007.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the antibacterial effect of sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), and chlorhexidine (CHX) on Enterococcus faecalis and to evaluate and to compare the time-dependant antimicrobial effect of NaDCC with NaOCl and CHX in the root canal in vitro before and after instrumentation. Extracted Human single teeth were prepared by serial instrumentation technique. The samples were autoclaved and contaminated for 3 days with E. faecalis monocultures. The teeth were then divided into 4 groups Each group was irrigated and inserted with 2% NaOCl, 2% NaDCC, 2% CHX and steri)ized saline. After 6, 12, 24, 72h, and 1 week incubation, sterilized paper point was inserted into the root canal. Paper points containing root canal contents were then placed on the agar plate. And then each root cana) was prepared with #4 and #5 GG (Gates-Glidden) drill. The debris were collected in the sterilized microtube and the plates were incubated at $37^{\circ}C$ in an increased $CO_2$ atmosphere. After 24h incubation the growth of bacteria around the paper points were measured. NaOCl and NaDCC solution shows similar antimicrobial effect for E. faecalis at 6, 12, 24, 72h and 1 week. In centrol group, irrigated with sterilized saline, no antimicrobial effect was observed. The results are in agreement with other investigators, who have shown the bactericidal property and possibility of NaDCC as a root canal irrigation solution. Thus it seems that NaDCC solutions can be clinically applied into the root canal within 1 week after dilution.

이염화이소시아뉼산나트륨 (NaDCC)은 염소 화합물의 일종으로 차아염소산나트륨 (NaOCl)과 비교 시 동일한 농도의 용액에서 같은 염소 이온을 가지고 있으며 비슷한 정도의 항균력을 가진다고 알려져 있다 이 연구의 목적은 이염화이소시아뉼산나트륨 근관 내 사용 시 시간에 따른 항균성을 평가하고 이를 현재 근관세척제로 사용되고 있는 차아염소산나트륨 및 클로르헥시딘 (CHX)과 비교하고자 하였다. E. faecalis에 대한 세 가지 제재의 최소증식억제 농도 (MIC)를 실험한 결과 NaOCl과 NaDCC에서는 0.125%를 보였고 CHX에서는 0.063%로 나타났다. 근관 내 사용에 대한 실험은 최근에 발거된 128개의 단근치를 사용하였으며 치경부와 치근단 부위를 절단하여 10 mm 길이를 가지는 시편을 만들었다. 시편의 내경은 #3 Gates-Glidden drill을 이용하여 동일하게 하였다. 각각의 치아 시편의 근관 내에 E. faecalis를 접종하고 3일간 배양한 후 40개씩 3개의 군으로 분류하고 대조군으로 8개의 시편을 이용하였다. 실험군 1, 2, 3은 각각 NaDCC, NaOCl, CHX으로 근관세척하였고 대조군은 멸균된 식염수를 이용하였다. 각 군은 다시 12시간, 24시간, 72시간, 7일의 시간에 따라 4개의 하위 군으로 분류하였다. 정해진 시간이 지난 후 멸균된 paper point를 이용하여 근관 내용물을 채취하고 BHI agar plate로 옮겨 배양하였다. 그 후 #4, 5GG drill을 이용하여 근관 내면을 삭제하고 이 때 생겨나는 상아질을 멸균된 증류수가 들어있는 시험관에 넣었다. 이것을 희석하여 BHI agar plate로 옮겨 배양하였다. 24시간이 지난 후 bacterial CFU를 측정하였다. 실험 결과 모든 실험군에서 bacterial CFU가 관찰되지 않았고 E. faecalis에 대한 세 가지 제재 모두 비슷한 항균 효과를 보였다. 멸균된 식염수를 이용한 대조군에서는 모두 bacterial CFU가 존재하였다. NaDCC를 근관세척제로 사용할 경우 1주 이내의 시간 동안에는 적절한 항균효과를 유지 할 수 있을 것이라 생각되며 임상에 적용하기 위해서는 조직 용해도를 비롯한 치근단 조직에 대한 직접적인 영향 등의 평가가 더 이루어져야 할 것으로 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kakehashi S, Stanley HR. Fizgerald RJ. The effects of surgical exposures of dental pulps in germ-free and conventional laboratory rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 20:340-349, 1965 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(65)90166-0
  2. Bystrom A, Sundqvist G. Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy. Scand J Dent Res 89:321-328, 1981
  3. Haapasalo M, Endal D, Zandi H, Jeffrey M. Coil. Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions. Endodontic Topics 10: 77-102. 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00135.x
  4. Sundqvist G, Fiigdor D. Persson S, Sjogren U. Microbiologic analysis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outcome of conservative re-treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 85:86-93. 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90404-8
  5. Heling I, Chandler NP. Antimicrobial effect of irrigant combinations within dentinal tubules. Int Endod J 31:8-14, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1998.t01-1-00124.x
  6. Barrette WC Jr, Hannum DM. Wheeler WD, Hurst JK. General mechanism for the bacterial toxicity of hypochlorous acid: abolition of ATP production. Biochemistry 28:9172-9178. 1989 https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00449a032
  7. MaKenna SM, Davies KJ. The inhibition of bacterial growth by hypochlorous acid. Possible role in the bactericidal activity of phagocytes. Biochem J 254: 685-692. 1988 https://doi.org/10.1042/bj2540685
  8. Siqueira JF Jr. Machado AG, Silveira RM. Lopes HP. de Uzeda M. Evaluation of the effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite used with three irrigation methods in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from the root canal. in vitro. Int Endod J 30: 279-282. 1997 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1997.tb00708.x
  9. McComb D, Smith DC. Beagrie GS. The results of in vivo endodontic chemomechanical instrumentation--a scanning electron microscopic study. J Br Endod Soc 9:11-18, 1976 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1976.tb01231.x
  10. Coates D. Comparison of sodium hypochlorite and sodium dichloroisocyanurate disinfectants: neutralization by serum. J Hosp Infect 11:60-67. 1988 https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-6701(88)90040-0
  11. Coates D. A comparison of sodium hypochlorite and sodium dichloroisocyanurate products. J Hosp Infect 6:31-40, 1985
  12. Russell AD, Day MJ. Antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine. J Hosp Infect 25:229-238. 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-6701(93)90109-D
  13. White RR. Hays GL. Janer LR. Residual antimicrobial activity after canal irrigation with chlorhexidine. J Endod 23:229-231, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80052-0
  14. Russell AD. Activity of biocides against mycobacteria. J Appl Bacteriol Symp 81 :87S-101S. 1996
  15. Goldman M, Pearson AH. Postdebridement bacterial flora and antibiotic sensitivity. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 28:897-905, 1969 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(69)90346-6
  16. Basrani B. Tjaderhane L. Santos JM. Pascon E. Grad H. Lawrence HP, Friedman S. Efficacy of chlorhexidine- and calcium hydroxide-containing medicaments against Enterococcus faecalis in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 96:618-624, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(03)00166-5
  17. Haapasalo M. Ostavik D. : In vitro Infection and Disinfection of Dentinal Tubules. J Dent Res 66:1375-1379. 1987 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660081801
  18. Russell S. Anthony P, Steven R. Thomas B, Frederick L. An in vitro evaluation of the antibacterial efficacy of chlorine dioxide on E. faecalis in bovine incisors. J Endod 31 :672-675. 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000155223.87616.02
  19. Kuruvilla JR. Kamath MP, Antimicrobial activity of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate separately and combined. as endodontic irrigants. J Endod 24:472-476. 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80049-6
  20. Ringel AM. Patterson SS. Newton CW, Miller CH, Mulhern JM. In vivo evaluation of chlorhexidine gluconate solution and sodium hypochlorite solution as root canal irrigants. J Endod 8:200-204. 1982 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(82)80354-3
  21. Harrison JW, Hand RE. The effect of dilution and organic matter on the anti-bacterial property of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 7: 128-132. 198 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(81)80127-6
  22. Vahdaty A. Pitt Ford TR. Wilson RF. Efficacy of chlorhexidine in disinfecting dentinal tubules in vitro. Endod Dent Traumatol 9:243-248. 1993 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1993.tb00280.x
  23. Dametto FR. Ferraz CC. De Almeida Gomes BP. Zaia AA. Teixeira FB. De Souza-Filho FJ. In vitro assessment of the immediate and prolonged antimicrobial action of chIorhexidine gel as an endodontic irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radial Endod 99:768-772, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.08.026
  24. Lee WC. Kang BS. Kim CH. Son HH. Evaluation of sodium dichloroisocyanurate as a root canal irrigation solution; Cl- concentration. pH, cytotoxicity and antimicrobial effect in vitro. Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 28 :425-430. 2003 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.5.425

Cited by

  1. The effect of MTAD as a final root canal irrigants on the coronal bacterial leakage of obturated root canals vol.33, pp.4, 2008, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.4.397
  2. removal efficacy of the EndoVac® and EndoActivator® intracanal irrigation methods vol.34, pp.5, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.5.390
  3. Comparison of Antibacterial effect of Listerine® with Various root canal irrigants vol.34, pp.6, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.6.500
  4. The comparison of different canal irrigation methods to prevent reaction precipitate between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine vol.35, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.2.080
  5. Analysis of para-chloroaniline after chemical interaction between alexidine and sodium hypochlorite using mass spectrometry: A preliminary study vol.35, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.4.295
  6. Effect of Gamma Irradiation and Its Convergent Treatments on Lily Leaf Blight Pathogen, Botrytis elliptica, and the Disease Development vol.20, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5423/RPD.2014.20.2.071
  7. Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity and Disease Control Efficacy of Sodium Dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC) Against Major Strawberry Diseases vol.19, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7585/kjps.2015.19.1.47
  8. SEM study vol.39, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.4.258