Journal of Animal Science and Technology

Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology (한국축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Tumbling Time on Quality Characteristics of Ham From Retail Cuts of Hind Leg

텀블링 시간이 돈육 뒷다리 소분할부위로 제조된 햄 품질에 미치는 영향

  • Seong, P.N. (National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Kim, J.H. (National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Cho, S.H. (National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Hah, K.H. (National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Park, B.Y. (National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Kim, D.H. (National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Lee, J.M. (National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Ahn, J.N. (National Institute of Animal Science)
  • 성필남 (축산과학원 축산물이용과) ;
  • 김진형 (축산과학원 축산물이용과) ;
  • 조수현 (축산과학원 축산물이용과) ;
  • 하경희 (축산과학원 축산물이용과) ;
  • 박범영 (축산과학원 축산물이용과) ;
  • 김동훈 (축산과학원 축산물이용과) ;
  • 이종문 (축산과학원 축산물이용과) ;
  • 안종남 (축산과학원 축산물이용과)
  • Published : 2007.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The effect of tumbling time(0, 1, and 2hr) on quality characteristics of cured-smoked pork retail cuts (Bolgi, Seolgit, Boseop, Dogani, Satae) of hind leg was investigated. Quality analyses indicated the retail cuts of pork hind leg are variable except for proximate composition. The Satae ham had the lowest (P<0.05) lightness (L) and highest redness (a). The Bolgi and Seolgit ham had higher hardness than the other hams. Tumbling time(0, 1, and 2hr) had no significant(P>0.05) effect on proximate composition, pH, color, texture properties, and sensory properties of ham. However tumbling decreased cooking loss for Satae ham tumbled for 2hr(P<0.05). Tumbling time was required for more than 2hr to improve quality and obtain maximum yield of retail cut hams. Further study is necessary to improve quality and obtain maximum yield of pork retail cuts of hind leg.

돼지 뒷다리 부위를 구성하는 소분할 5개 부위의 텀블링 시간에 따른 햄의 품질을 비교하여 기초자료를 제시하고자 텀블링을 0, 1, 2시간 한 후 햄을 제조하여 소분할별 품질차이를 조사한 결과, 뒷다리 소분할 5개 부위 햄의 염도, 제품색 명도(L)는 대조구인 등심부위보다 낮았으며(P<0.05), 특히, 사태부위로 제조한 햄의 명도가 가장 낮았다. 적색도와 황색도는 뒷다리 소분할햄들이 등심햄보다 높았으며, 사태햄의 적색도가 가장 높은 경향을 보였다(P<0.05). 부위별 조직감은 텀블링 1시간 처리구에서만 경도, 검성, 씹힘성에서 차이를 보였는데 상대적으로 덩어리가 큰 볼기와 설깃햄의 경도가 높은 경향을 보였다. 관능적 특성 중 제품색의 경우 텀블링 무처리구에서 보섭과 볼기햄이 등심햄에 비해 유의적으로 낮은 값을 나타내었다(P<0.05). 돼지 뒷다리 소분할 5개 부위별 품질차이는 일반성분을 제외한 거의 모든 항목에서 차이를 보였다. 하지만 본 시험에서 적용한 텀블링 시간에 따른 차이는 일반성분 함량, pH, 제품색, 조직감, 관능적 특성에 있어 차이가 나타나지 않아 뒷다리 소분할 부위로 비분쇄 훈연햄을 제조할 경우 2시간 텀블링 처리는 품질적인 변화를 볼 수 없는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 텀블링 시간은 보섭부위의 가열감량에 영향을 미쳐 2시간 텀블링 처리로 가열감량을 감소시킬 수 있는 것으로 나타났다(P<0.05). 따라서 돼지 뒷다리 소분할을 이용한 햄을 제조할 경우 제품수율과 품질을 최상으로 만들기 위해서는 각 부위별 육질특성과 제품의 품질특성의 상관성에 대한 연구가 필요하다고 생각되며, 최적의 텀블링 시간을 정하는데 주의를 기울여야 할 것으로 보인다. 본 시험결과 2시간 이내의 텀블링으로는 품질향상을 기대하기 어렵기 때문에 시간을 늘리는 등의 추가적 시험이 필요할 것으로 판단되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. AOAC. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis(17th Ed.) Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, D. G, U.S.A., chapter 39. pp. 1-8
  2. Bouton, P. e., Harris, P. V. and Shorthose, W. R. 1972. The effect of ultimate pH on ovine muscle water holding capacity. J. Food Sci. 37:351-355 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1972.tb02635.x
  3. Chow, H. M., Ockerman, H. W., Cahill, V. R. and Parrett, N. A. 1986. Evaluation of cured, canned pork shoulder tissue produced by electrical stimulation hot processing and tumbling. J. Food Sci. 51:288-291 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1986.tb11111.x
  4. Dransfield, E. 1977. Intramuscular composition and texture of beef muscles. J. Sci. Food Agric. 28:833-842 https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740280910
  5. Dzudie, T. and Okubanjo, A. 1999. Effects of rigor state and tumbling time on quality of goat hams. J. Food Eng. 42:103-107 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(99)00097-7
  6. Gillet, T. A., Cassidy, R. D. and Simon. 1981. Effect of continuous massaging on bind yield and colour of hams. J. Food Sci. 46:1681-1683 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1981.tb04462.x
  7. Harris, P. V. and Shorthose, W. R. 1988. Meat texture. In R. Lawrie (Ed.), Developments in meat science (pp. 245-290). London and New York: Elsevier Applied Science
  8. Hullberg, A., Johansson, L. and Lundstrom, K. 2005. Effect of tumbling and RN genotype on sensory perception of cured-smoked pork loin. Meat Sci. 69:721-732 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.07.013
  9. Karlson, A., Enfalt, a. Ch., Essen-Gustavson, B., Lundstrom, K., Rydhamer, L. and Stern, S. 1993. Muscle histochemical and biochemical properties in relation to meat quality during selection for increased lean tissue growth rate in pigs. J. Anim Sci. 71:930-938
  10. Krause, R. J. 1976. Influence of tumbling and sodium tripolyphosphate on quality, yield and cure distribution in hams. M.S. thesis. The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
  11. Motycka, R. R. and Bechtel, P. J. 1983. Influence of pre-rigor processing, mechanical tenderization, tumbling method and processing time on the quality and yield of ham. J. Food Sci. 48: 1532-1536 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1983.tb03531.x
  12. Payne, C. A., Hunt, M. C, Warren, K. E., Hayden, J. M., Williams, J. E. and Hedrick, H. B. 1992. Histochemical properties of four bovine muscles as influenced by compensatory gain and growth impetus. In Proceedings of the 38th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, (pp. 121-124) Clermont-Ferrand, France
  13. SAS. 1996. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA
  14. Savell, J. W., Smith, G. C. and Carpenter, Z. L. 1977. Blade tenderization of four three weight-grade groups of beef. J. Food Sci. 42:866-870 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1977.tb12625.x
  15. Shackelford, S. D., Reagan, J. O., Mann, T. F., Lyon, C. E. and Miller, M. F. 1989. Effect of blade tenderization, vacuum massage time and salt level on chemical, textural and sensory characteristics of precooked chuck roast. J. Food Sci. 54:843-845 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1989.tb07895.x
  16. Shackelford, S. D., Wheeler, T. L. and Kooh-maraie, M. 1995. Relationship between shear force and trained sensory panel tenderness ratings of 10 major muscles from Bos indicus and Bos taurus cattle. J. Anim Sci. 73:3333-3340 https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.73113333x
  17. Siegel, D. G., Theno, D. M., Schmidt, G. R. and Norton, H. W. 1978. Meat massaging: the effect of salt, phosphate and massaging on cooking loss, binding strength and exudate composition in sectioned and formed ham. J. Food Sci. 43: 331-333 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1978.tb02298.x
  18. van Laack, R. J. M., Smulders, F. J. M. and van Roon, P. S. 1989. Functional properties of pre-rigor pork: Hot vs cold processing of cooked shoulders and hams. J. Food Sci. 54:307-310 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1989.tb03068.x
  19. Varnam. A. H. and Sutherland, J. P. 1995. Meat and meat products. Chapman & Hall. Inc., London, Glasgow, Weinheim, New York, Tokyo, Melbourne, Madras. UK. pp. 179-184
  20. Weiss, J. M. 1973. Ham tumbling and massaging. Western Meat Industry. 14. 23-28
  21. Whiting, R. C. 1988. Ingredients and processing factors that control muscle protein functionality. Food Tech. 42:104-114, 210
  22. Wiklund, E., Malmfors, G. and Lundstrom, K. 1998. The effects of exercise on muscle fibre composition and oxidative capacity in eight bovine skeletal muscles. Swedish J. Agric Res. 28: 111-116

Cited by

  1. Effects of Mechanical Processing and Ganghwa Mugwort on Stability of Chicken Neobiahni during Storage vol.32, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2016.32.3.261