Asia pacific journal of information systems

The Korea Society of Management Information Systems (한국경영정보학회)
권호 표지

Importance of End User's Feedback Seeking Behavior for Faithful Appropriation of Information Systems in Small and Medium Enterprises

중소기업 환경에서의 합목적적 정보시스템 활용을 위한 최종사용자 피드백 탐색행위의 중요성

  • Published : 2007.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Small-and-medium sized enterprises(SMEs) represent quite a large proportion of the industry as a whole in terms of the number of enterprises or employees. However researches on information system so far have focused on large companies, probably because SMEs were not so active in introducing information systems as larger enterprises. SMEs are now increasingly bringing in information systems such as ERP(Enterprise Resource Planning Systems) and some of the companies already entered the stage of ongoing use. Accordingly, researches should deal with the use of information systems by SME s operating under different conditions from large companies. This study examined factors and mechanism inducing faithful appropriation of information systems, in particular integrative systems such as ERP, in view of individuals` active feedback-seeking behavior. There are three factors expected to affect end users` feedback-seeking behavior for faithful appropriation of information systems. They are management support, peer IT champ support, and IT staff support. The main focus of the study is on how these factors affect feedback-seeking behavior and whether the feedback-seeking behavior plays the role of mediator for realizing faithful appropriation of information systems by end users. To examine the research model and the hypotheses, this study employed an empirical method based on a field survey. The survey used measurements mostly employed and verified by previous researches, while some of the measurements had gone through minor modifications for the purpose of the study. The survey respondents are individual employees of SMEs that have been using ERP for one year or longer. To prevent common method bias, Task-Technology Fit items used as the control variable were made to be answered by different respondents. In total, 127 pairs of valid questionnaires were collected and used for the analysis. The PLS(Partial Least Squares) approach to structural equation modeling(PLS-Graph v.3.0) was used as our data analysis strategy because of its ability to model both formative and reflective latent constructs under small-and medium-size samples. The analysis shows Reliability, Construct Validity and Discriminant Validity are appropriate. The path analysis results are as follows; first, the more there is peer IT champ support, the more the end user is likely to show feedback-seeking behavior(path-coefficient=0.230, t=2.28, p<0.05). In other words, if colleagues proficient in information system use recognize the importance of their help, pass on what they have found to be an effective way of using the system or correct others' misuse, ordinary end users will be able to seek feedback on the faithfulness of their appropriation of information system without hesitation, because they know the convenience of getting help. Second, management support encourages ordinary end users to seek more feedback(path-coefficient=0.271, t=3.06, p<0.01) by affecting the end users' perceived value of feedback(path-coefficient=0.401, t=6.01, p<0.01). Management support is far more influential than other factors that when the management of an SME well understands the benefit of ERP, promotes its faithful appropriation and pays attention to employees' satisfaction with the system, employees will make deliberate efforts for faithful appropriation of the system. However, the third factor, IT staff support was found not to be conducive to feedback-seeking behavior from end users(path-coefficient=0.174, t=1.83). This is partly attributable to the fundamental reason that there is little support for end users from IT staff in SMEs. Even when IT staff provides support, end users may find it less important than that from coworkers more familiar with the end users' job. Meanwhile, the more end users seek feedback and attempt to find ways of faithful appropriation of information systems, the more likely the users will be able to deploy the system according to the purpose the system was originally meant for(path-coefficient=0.35, t=2.88, p<0.01). Finally, the mediation effect analysis confirmed the mediation effect of feedback-seeking behavior. By confirming the mediation effect of feedback-seeking behavior, this study draws attention to the importance of feedback-seeking behavior that has long been overlooked in research about information system use. This study also explores the factors that promote feedback-seeking behavior which in result could affect end user`s faithful appropriation of information systems. In addition, this study provides insight about which inducements or resources SMEs should offer to promote individual users' feedback-seeking behavior when formal and sufficient support from IT staff or an outside information system provider is hardly expected. As the study results show, under the business environment of SMEs, help from skilled colleagues and the management plays a critical role. Therefore, SMEs should seriously consider how to utilize skilled peer information system users, while the management should pay keen attention to end users and support them to make the most of information systems.

Keywords

References

  1. http://www.ihkim.pe.kr/speech/kosbi/20050517.html
  2. http://rru.worldbank.org/Documents/other/MSMEdatabase/msme_database_ 0706.xls
  3. Ang, S., Cummings, L.L., Straub, D.W., and Earley, C.P., "The Effects of Information Technology and The Perceived Mood of The Feedback Giver on Feedback Seeking," Information Systems Research, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1993, pp. 17-29
  4. Amoroso D.L., "Organizational Issues of End-User Computing," Database, Vol. 19, No. 3-4, 1988, pp. 49-58
  5. Amoroso D.L., and Cheney P.H., "Testing a Causal Model of End-User Application Effectiveness," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1991, pp. 63-89
  6. Ashford, A.J., "Feedback-Seeking in Individual Adaptation: A Resource Perspective," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 29, No. 3, 1986, pp. 465-487 https://doi.org/10.2307/256219
  7. Ashford, S.J. and Cummings, L.L., "Feedback as an Individual Resource: Personal Strategies of Creating Information," Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 32, 1983, pp. 370-398 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90156-3
  8. Attewell, P. and Rule, J., "Survey and Other Methodologies Applied to IT Research: Experiences from a Comparative Study of Business Computing," in The Information Systems Research Challenge: Survey Research Methods, K. Kraemer (Ed.), Haward Business School Research Colloquium, Boston, MA, 1991
  9. Bandura, A., Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive The ory, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986
  10. Barclay, D., Higgins, C.A., and Thompson, R.L., "The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration," Technology Studies Vol. 2, No. 2, 1995, pp. 285-309
  11. Beach, L.R., The Psychology of Decision Making: People in Organizations, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1997
  12. Beath, C.M., "Supporting the Information Technology Champion," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 15, No. 3, 1991, pp. 355-371 https://doi.org/10.2307/249647
  13. Berlyne, D.E., Conflict arousal and curiosity. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1960
  14. Blili, S. and Raymond, L., "Information Technology: Threats and Opportunities for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises," International J. Information Management, Vol. 13, No. 6, December 1993, pp. 439-448 https://doi.org/10.1016/0268-4012(93)90060-H
  15. Bjorn-Andersen, N., Eason, K., and Robey, D., Managing Computer Impact, Ablex Publishing, Nonvood, NJ, 1986.
  16. Buyukkurt, M.D., and Vass, E.C., "An Investigation of Factors Contributing to Satisfaction with End-User Computing Process," Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences Vol. 10, No. 3, 1993, pp. 212-228 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.1993.tb00029.x
  17. Bullen, Christine V. and John L., Bennett, "Groupware in Practice: An Interpretation of Work Experience," Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Los Angeles, CA, October, 1990
  18. Cerveny, R.P. and Sanders, G.L., "Implementation and Structural Variables," Information & Management, Vol. 11, No. 4, 1986, pp. 191-198 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(86)90004-2
  19. Chin, W.W., Gopal, A., and Salisbury, W.D., "Advancing the Theory of Adaptive Struc- turation: The Development of a Scale to Measure Faithfulness of Appropriation," Information Systems Research Vol. 8, No. 4, 1997, pp. 342-367 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.4.342
  20. Chin, W.W. and Todd, P.A., "On the Use, Usefulness, and Ease of Use of Structural Equation Modeling in MIS Research: A Note of Caution," MIS Quarterly Vol. 19, No. 2, 1995, pp. 237-246 https://doi.org/10.2307/249690
  21. Cooper, R.B. and Zmud, R.W., "Informa- tion Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion Approach," Manage- ment Science Vol. 36, No. 2, 1990, pp. 123-139 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.2.123
  22. Crawford, J.L., "Task Uncertainty, Decision Importance, and Group Reinforcement as Determinants of Communication Processes in Groups," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 29, 1974, pp. 619-627 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036616
  23. Davis, S.A. and Bostrom, R.P., "Training End Users: An Experimental Investigation of the Roles of the Computer Interface and Training Methods," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 1, 1993, pp. 61-86 https://doi.org/10.2307/249510
  24. DeLone, W.H., "Determinants of Success for Computer Usage in Small Business," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1988, pp. 51-61 https://doi.org/10.2307/248803
  25. Dennis, A.R., Wixom, B.H., and Vandenberg, R.J., "Fit &Appropriation Model in GSS," MIS Quarterly Vol. 25 No. 2, 2001, pp. 167-193 https://doi.org/10.2307/3250928
  26. DeSanctis, G. and Poole, M.S., "Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory," Organization Science, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1994, pp. 121-147 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.2.121
  27. Dickson, G.W., Leitheiser, R.L., Wetherbe, J.C., and Nechis, M., "Key Information Systems Issues for the 198O's," MIS Quar- terly, Vol. 8, No. 3, 1984, pp. 135-148
  28. Fedor, D.B., Rensvold, R.B., and Adams, S.M., "An Investigation of Factors Expected to Affect Feedback Seeking: A Longitudinal Field Study," Personnel Psychology, Vol. 45, 1992, pp. 779-805 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1992.tb00968.x
  29. Floyd, S.W., "A Causal Model of Managerial Electronic Workstation Use," unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, 1986
  30. Floyd, S.W., "A Micro Level Model of Information Technology Use by Managers," in Studies in Technological Innovation and Human Resources(Vol. 1) Managing Technological Development, U.E. Gattiker (ed.), Walter Gruyter, Berlin & New York, 1988, pp. 123-142
  31. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D., "Evaluating Struc- tural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement error," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1981, pp. 116-142
  32. Frost, P.J., "Power, Politics, and Influence," in The Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, F.M. Jablin, L.L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, and L.W. Porter (Eds.), Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, 1987, pp. 503-548
  33. Gable, G.G., "Consultant Engagement for First Time Computerization: A Pro-active Client Role in Small Businesses," Information & Management, Vol. 20, 1991, pp. 83-93 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(91)90046-5
  34. Gifford, W.E., Bobbitt, H. R., and Slocum, J.W., Jr. "Message Characteristics and Per- ceptions of Uncertainty by Organizational Decision Makers," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 22, 1979, pp. 458-481 https://doi.org/10.2307/255738
  35. Goodhue, D.L., "IS Attitudes: Toward Theore- tical and Definition Clarity," Database, Vol. 19, No. 3-4, 1988, pp. 6-15
  36. Goodhue, D.L. and Thompson, R.L., "Task- Technology Fit and Individual Performance," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 2, 1995, pp. 213-236 https://doi.org/10.2307/249689
  37. Gupta. A. and Govindarajan, V., "Knowledge Flows within Multinational Corporations," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, 2000. pp. 473-496 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200004)21:4<473::AID-SMJ84>3.0.CO;2-I
  38. Hall, R.H., Organizations: Structures, Pro- cesses, and Outcomes (7th ed.), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999
  39. Hair, J.E. Jr., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., and Black, W.C., Multivariate Data Analy- sis, Fifth Edition, Prentice-Hall Internatio- nal, Inc., 1998
  40. Hansen, M., "The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Know-ledge Across Organization Subunits," Admini-strative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44, 1999, pp. 82-111 https://doi.org/10.2307/2667032
  41. Harrison, A.W. and Rainer, R.K. Jr., "The Influence of Individual Differences on Skill in End-User Computing," Management information Systems, Vol. 9, 1992, pp. 93-111 https://doi.org/10.1080/10580539208906858
  42. Howell, Jane M. and Christopher A. Hi- ggins, "Champions of Technological Inno- vation," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 2, 1990, pp. 317-341 https://doi.org/10.2307/2393393
  43. Huang, A.H., "A Three-tier Technology Training Strategy in a Dynamic Business Environment," Journal of End User Computing, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2002, pp. 30-39
  44. Igbaria, M., "User Acceptance of Microcomputer Technology: An Empirical Test," Omega, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1993, pp. 73-90 https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(93)90040-R
  45. Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., and Cavaye, A.L.M., "Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 3, 1997, pp. 279-305 https://doi.org/10.2307/249498
  46. Ilgen, D.R., Fisher, C.D., and Taylor, M.S., "Consequences of Individual Feedback on Behavior in Organizations," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 64, 1979, pp. 349-371 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.64.4.349
  47. Jasperson, J., Carte, T.A., Saunders, C.S., Butler, B.S., Croes, H.J. P., and Zheng, W., "Review: Power and Information Tech- nology Research: A Metatriangulation Review," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2002, pp. 397-459 https://doi.org/10.2307/4132315
  48. Jasperson, J., Carter, P.E., and Zmud, R. W., "A Comprehensive Conceptulization of Post-Adoptive Behaviors Associated With Information Technology Enabled Work Systems," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2005, pp. 525-558
  49. Krauss, R. and Fussell, S., "Mutual Know- ledge and Communications Effectiveness," in Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work, J. Calegher, R. Kraut, and C. Egido (Eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1990, pp. 111-145
  50. Kuchinke, K.P., "The Role of Feedback in Management Training Settings," Human Resource Development Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2000, pp. 381-401 https://doi.org/10.1002/1532-1096(200024)11:4<381::AID-HRDQ5>3.0.CO;2-3
  51. Kwon, T.H. and Zmud, R.W., "Unifying the Fragmented Models of Information Systems Implementation," in Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, R.J. Boland, Jr. and R.A. Hirscheim (Eds.), Wiley, New York, 1987
  52. Locke, E.A. and Latham, G.P., A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NY, 1990
  53. London, M. and Smither, J., "Empowered Self-development and Continuous Learning," Human Resource Management, Vol. 38, No. 1, 1999, pp. 3-15 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-050X(199921)38:1<3::AID-HRM2>3.0.CO;2-M
  54. Lucas, H.C, Jr. Implementation: The Key to Successful Information Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1981
  55. Lucas Jr., H.C. and Spitler, V.K., "Tech- nology Use and Performance: A Field Study of Broker Workstations," Decision Sciences, Vol. 30, No. 2, 1999, pp. 291-311 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01611.x
  56. Maidique, M.A., "Entrepreneurs, champions; and Technological Innovation," Sloan Management Review, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1980, pp. 59-76
  57. March, J.G., A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen, The Free Press, New York, 1994
  58. Organ, D.W., Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, 1988
  59. Organ, D.W., "Personality and Organizational Citizenship Behavior," Journal of Management, Vol. 20, No. 2, 1994, pp. 465-478 https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-2063(94)90023-X
  60. Orlikowski, W.J., Yates, J., Okamura, K., and Fujimoto, M., "Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use," Organization Science, Vol. 6, No. 4, 1995, pp. 423-445 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.4.423
  61. Podsakoff et al., "Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for future research," Journal of Management, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2000, pp. 513- 563 https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600307
  62. Poole, M..S. and DeSanctis, G., "Understanding the Use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration," in J. Fulk and C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and Communication Technology, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1990, pp. 173-193
  63. Poole, M.S. and DeSanctis, G., "Microlevel Structuration in Computer-Supported Group Decision Making," Human Communication Res., Vol. 19, No. 1, 1992, pp. 5-49 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00294.x
  64. Powers, W.T., Behavior: The Control of Perception, Aldine Publishing Co., Chicago, 1973
  65. Raymond, L., "Organizational Characteristics and MIS Success in the Context of Small Business," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 9, No. 1, 1985, pp. 37-52 https://doi.org/10.2307/249272
  66. Sambamurthy, V., and Chin, W.W., "The Effects of Group Attitudes Toward GDSS Designs on the Decision-Making Performance of Computer-Supported Groups," Decision Science., Vol. 25, No. 2, 1994, pp. 215-241 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1994.tb01840.x
  67. Schon, D.A., "Champions for Radical New Inventions," Harvard Business Review, Vol. 41, No. 2, 1963, pp. 77-86
  68. Singh, J., Goolsby, J.R., and Rhoads, G.K., "Behavioral and Psychological Consequences of Boundary Spanning Burnout for Customer Service Representatives," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 31, 1994, pp. 558-569 https://doi.org/10.2307/3151883
  69. Spitler, V.K., "Learning to Use IT in the Workplace: Mechanisms and Masters," Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2005, pp. 1-25
  70. Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S., Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991
  71. Thompson, R.L., Higgins, C.A., and Howell, J.M., "Influence of Experience on Personal Computer Utilization: Testing a Conceptual Model," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1994, pp. 167-187
  72. Todd, P. and Benbasat, I., "Decision Aids and Compensatory Information Processing," Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2000, pp. 91-106 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<91::AID-BDM345>3.0.CO;2-A
  73. Vancouver, J.B. and Morrison, E.W., "Feedback inquiry: The Effect of Source Attri- butes and Individual Differences," Organi- zational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 62, No. 3, 1995, pp. 276-285 https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1050
  74. Van Dyne, L. and LePine, J.A., "Helping and Voice Extra-Role Behaviors: Evidence of Construct and Predictive Validity," The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 41, No. 1, 1998, pp. 108-119 https://doi.org/10.2307/256902
  75. Venkatesh, V. and Morris, M.G., "Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2000, pp. 115-139 https://doi.org/10.2307/3250981
  76. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., and Davis, F.D., "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2003, pp. 425-478
  77. Wheeler, B.C. and Valacich, J.S., "Facilitation, GSS, and Training as Sources of Process Restrictiveness and Guidance for Structured Decision Making: An Empirical Assessment," Information Systems Research, Vol. 7, No. 4, 1996, pp. 429-450 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.4.429
  78. Weick, K.E., "Technology as Equivoque: Sensemaking in New Technologies," in Technology and Organizations, P.S. Goodman and L.S. Sproull (Eds.), Jossey-Bass, San Fran- cisco, 1990, pp. 1-44
  79. White, R.W., "Motivation Reconsidered: The Concept of Competence," Psychological Review, Vol. 66, 1959, pp. 297-333 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040934
  80. White, R.W., "Strategies for adaptation: An Attempt at Systematic Description." in G. V. Coelho, D.A. Hamburg, & J.E. Adams (Eds.), Coping and adaptation, Basic Books, New York, 1974. pp. 47-68
  81. Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P.B., and Cavaye, A.L.M., "End User Computing Sophistication and Success in Small Firms," European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1996, pp. 172-181 https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.1996.23
  82. Zmud, R.W. and Lind, M.R., "Linking Me- chanisms Supporting End-User Computing," Proc. 12th Annual Conf. ACM SIG CPR/SIGBDP, Minneapolis, MN, 1985, pp. 74-80