A Study on the Types of Design Problem Solving by Analogical Thinking - Focused on the Analysis of Associated Words and Sketch -

유추적 사고에 의한 디자인 문제해결의 유형 - 연상된 단어와 스케치 분석을 중심으로 -

  • 최은희 (서울대학교 대학원 디자인학부) ;
  • 최윤아 (홍익대학교 건축공학과)
  • Published : 2007.04.30

Abstract

Analogy in problem solving is similarity-based reasoning facilitated by verbal and visual operation. This similarity-based reasoning generally supports initial phase of idea search. Therefore, this study intends to infer the types of problem solving by tracing the analogy use of verbal and visual representation through a experimental research. According to the result of this research, the types of problem solving by analogy are classified into 'evolving', 'divergent', and 'poor conversion' type. Firstly, 'evolving type' is distinguished between 'combination type' associated different contents to develope a new design and 'transformation type' associated similar words and sketches to be continuously revised and developed. In these types usually structural analogy rather than surface analogy is used. Secondly, in 'divergent type' associated words or sketches are individually represented, and among them one design solution is selected. In this type usually surface analogy is used. Thirdly, in 'poor conversion type' interaction between verbal representation and visual representation does not go on smoothly, and the generation of idea is poor. In here surface analogy is mostly used. These findings could form the basis of skill development of idea generation and conversion in design education.

Keywords

References

  1. John T. E. Richardson, Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for Psychology and Social Science, BPS Books, UK, 1996
  2. Garry Stevens, The Reasoning Architect: Mathematics and Science in Design, McGraw-Hill Inc., 1990
  3. Charles M. Eastman et al., Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education, Elsevier Science Ltd., UK, 2001
  4. Hernan Casakin, Visual Analogy as a Cognitive Strategy in Design Process: Expert versus Novice Performance, Journal of Design Research, 2004-Vol.4, No.2
  5. L. Novick, Analogical Transfer, Problem Similarity, and Expertise, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 1988
  6. Betty Edwards, Drawing on the Artist Within, Fireside, NY, 1986
  7. Betty Edwards, 오른쪽 두뇌로 그림그리기, 강은엽 역, 미완, 1989
  8. Robert J. Sternberg, 인지심리학, 김민식.손영숙.안서원 역, 박학사, 2005
  9. H. Casakin and G. Goldschmidt, Expertise and the Use of Visual Analogy: Implications for Design Education, Design Studies, Vol.20, Issue2, 1999
  10. G. Goldschmidt and M. Somolkov, Variances in the Impact of Visual Stimuli on Design Problem Solving Performance, Design Studies, Vol.27, Issue5, 2006
  11. 김성아, 설계프로세스의 표현과 분석을 위한 프로세스 뷰어 개발과 적용, 한국실내디자인학회논문집, 통권56호, 2006.6
  12. 박경애.이찬, 유추적 사고의 전개과정에 의한 디자인 의미개발에 관한 연구, 한국실내디자인학회논문집, 통권58호, 2006.10