Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지

Analysis of the Types of Laboratory Instruction in Elementary and Secondary Schools Science

초 . 중등학교 과학 실험수업의 유형 분석

  • Published : 2007.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the main laboratory instruction types with Classification Scheme of Laboratory Instruction (CSLI) in elementary and secondary schools science. For the purpose, the validity of the instrument CSLI was 4.23 and laboratory instructions were collected in 100 elementary schools and 30 secondary schools. Before analyzing the collected laboratory instructions, the inter-rater reliability about the analysis results was identified as 0.91. The results of this study were found that in elementary school, the main laboratory instruction types were verification type and discovery type and in secondary school were discovery type and verification type. In the category of the procedure, a large part of the procedures of laboratory activity in both elementary and secondary schools was given to students by worksheets or teachers themselves. In the category of approach, inductive approach was the main in elementary and deductive approach in secondary.

이 연구는 실험수업 유형 분류틀을 사용하여 초 중등학교에서 실시되고 있는 주요 실험수업의 유형들을 확인하는 것이다. 이 연구를 위해 사용된 실험수업 유형 분류틀의 타당도는 4.23이다. 이 연구를 위해, 초등학교에서 100차시, 중등학교에서 30차시의 실험수업이 분석대상으로 수집되었다. 실험수업들의 유형을 분석결과, 분석자간 일치도는 0.91이었다. 분석 결과, 초등학교에서는 발견실험수업과 확인실험수업이 주요 수업 유형임이, 중등학교에서는 확인실험수업과 발견실험수업이 주요 수업유형으로 확인되었다. 초등학교와 중등학교에서 대부분 실험절차가 교사나 활동지를 통해 학생들에게 주어지고 있었다. 실험의 접근방식은 초등에서는 귀납적인 형태가 많았고, 중등에서는 연역적인 형태가 많았다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김영신, 정완호 (2001). 과학적 사고력 발달에 영향 을 미치는 변인의 규명에 대한 연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 21(3), 590-608
  2. 김주훈, 이미경 (2003). 과학과 교육목표 및 내용체 계연구(I). 한국교육과정 평가원, 연구보고 RRC 2003-4, 28-43
  3. 김효남, 정완호, 정진우, 양일호, 김영선 (1999). 초. 중. 고 학생들의 과학 정의적 특성 추이 분석을 위한 종 단적 연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 19(2), 194-203
  4. 김희백, 김도욱 (1996) 중고등학생의 과학실험실 환 경에 대한 인식과 과학 및 과학 교과에 대한 태도. 한국과학교육학회지, 16(2), 210-216
  5. 심규철, 김현섭, 박영철 (2001). 중고등학생 및 대학생의 과학 관련 태도에 대한 비교 연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 21(3), 558-565
  6. 양일호, 정진우, 허명, 김석민 (2006a) 실험수업 유 형 분류틀 개발. 한국과학교육학회지, 26(3), 342-355
  7. 양일호, 조현준, 정진우, 허명, 김영선 (2006b) 학교 과학교육에서 실험 활동의 목적: 전문가 커뮤니티를 통한 댈파이 연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 26(2), 177-190
  8. 이미경, 김경희 (2004). 과학에 대한 태도와 과학성 취도의 관계. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(2), 399-407
  9. 이혜원, 양일호, 조현준 (2005). 초.중학생의 관찰, 예상, 가설의 이해. 초등과학교육, 24(3), 297-304
  10. Berg, C. A. R, Bergendahl, V. C. B., Lundberg, B. K. S., & Tibell, L. A. E. (2003). Benefiting from and open-ended experiment? A comparison of attitudes to, and outcomes of, an expository versus an open-inquiry version of the same experiment. International Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 351-372 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210145738
  11. Bybee, R, & DeBoer, G. (1994). Research on goals for the science curriculum. Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 357-387). New York: 1vfacMillan
  12. Byee, R. (2000). Teaching science as inquiry. In J. Minstrel & E. H. Van Zee (Eds.). Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 20-46). Washinton, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science
  13. Chang, C-Y, & Weng, Y-H. (2002). An exploratory study on students' problem-solving ability in earth science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 441-451 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110066502
  14. Dana, L. (2001). The effects of the level of inquiry of situated secondary science labcratory activities on students' understanding of concepts and the nature of science, ability to use process skills and attitudes toward problem solving. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Lowell
  15. Domin, D. S. (1999). A review of labcratory instruction styles. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 543-547 https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p543
  16. Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (1995). Investigative work in the science curriculum. Buckingham: Open University
  17. Hart, C, Mulhall, P., Berry, A, Loughran, J., & Gunstone, R. (2000). What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 655-675 https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200009)37:7<655::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-E
  18. Herron, M. D. (1971). The nature of scientific enquiry. School Review, 79(2), 171- 212 https://doi.org/10.1086/442968
  19. Hodson, D. (1990). A critical look at practical work in school science. The School Science Review, 70(256), 65-78
  20. Hodson, D. (1996). Practical work in school science: Exploring some directions for change. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), 755-760 https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180702
  21. Hofstein, A. (2004). The laboratory in chemistry education: Thirty years of experience with developments, implementation, and research. Chemistry Education, 5(3), 247-264
  22. Hofstein, A, & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 201-217 https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543052002201
  23. Hofstein, A, & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
  24. Kampourakis, C, & Tsaparlis, G. (2003). A study of the effect of a practical activity on problem solving in chemistry. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 4(3), 319-333 https://doi.org/10.1039/b2rp90047e
  25. Kapenda, H. M, Kandjeo-marenga, H. U, Kasanda, C. D., & Lubben. F. (2002). Characteristics of practical work in science classrooms in Namibia. Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(1), 53-65 https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140220130920
  26. Lawson, A. E. (1995). Science teaching and the development of thinking. Belmont, C.A: Wadsworth Publishing Company
  27. Lazarowitz, R., & Tamir, R. (1994). Research on using laboratory instruction in science. In D. Gabel (Ed,), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, (pp. 94-128). New York: Mac.Millan
  28. Lock, R. (1988). A history of practical work in school science and its assessment 1860-1986. School Science Review, 70(250), 115-119
  29. Millar, R., Le Marechal, J. F, & Bury, C. (1998). A map of the variety of labwork. Working paper 1. European Project: Labwork in science Education (Contract No. ERB -SOE2-CT-95-2001). The European Commission
  30. Millar, R., Le Marechal, J. F, & Tiberghien, A (1999). Mapping the domain- Varieties of practical work. In J. Leach & A C. Paulsen (Eds.), Practical work in science education: recent research studies. (pp. 33-59) Roskilde University Press: Kluwer Academic Publishers
  31. Nott, M (1997). Keeping scientists in their place. School Science Review, 78(285), 49-60
  32. Psillos, D., Niedderer, H, & Vicentini, M (1999). Case studies on innovative types of labwork in science education. In M Bandiera, S. Caravita, E. Torracca & M Vincentini (Eds,), Research in science education in Europe. (pp. 201-207) Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
  33. Qualter, A, Strang, J., Swatton, P., & Talyor, R. (1990). Exploration. A way of learning science. Oxford: Blackwell Education
  34. Roberts, R. (2004). Using different types of practical within a problem solving model of science. The School Science Reivew, 85(312), 113-119
  35. Simpson, P. D., & Anderson, N. D. (1981). What is scientific literacy? From science, students and schools. New York: Wileye
  36. Staer, H, Goodrum, D., & Hackling, M (1998). High school laboratory work in western australia: Openness to inquiry. Research in Science Education, 28(2), 219-228 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02462906
  37. Tobin, K (1986). Secondary science laboratory activities. European Journal of Science Education, 8, 199-211 https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528860080208
  38. Wellington, J. J. (2000), Teaching and learning secondary science - contemporary issues and practical approaches. London and New York; Routledge
  39. Welzel, M, Haller, K, Bandiera, M, Hammelev, D., Koumaras, P., Niedderer, H, Paulse, A. C, Becu-Robinault, K, & von Aufschnaiter, S. (1998). Teacher's objectives for labwork; research tool and cross country results. Working paper 6. European project: Labwork in Science Education (Targeted Socio-Economic Research Programme Project PL 95-2002). The Eurpean Commission
  40. White, R. T. (1996). The link between the laboratory and teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), 761-774 https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180703