Transactions of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering (한국소음진동공학회논문집)

The Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering (한국소음진동공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison between Indoor Noise Level and Subjective Response for Transportation Noise - Focusing on the Aircraft, Road traffic and Railway Noise

교통소음으로 인한 실내소음레벨과 주관반응 분석 - 항공기, 도로교통 및 철도소음을 중심으로

  • 박현구 (전남대학교 건축과학기술연구소) ;
  • 김선우 (전남대학교 건축공학부)
  • Published : 2007.05.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A series of research to seek for the relationship between subjective responses and noise level for transportation noise have been proceeded, and their results showed similar for some cases and different for some other cases as well, which is considered due to the various conditions such as the way of survey, different scale applied, and country etc. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between sound level and subjective response for the different kinds of transportation noise. The noises recorded in real situation were played to thirty subjects with fourty nine adjectives. The percentage of people annoyed(% PA) and the percentage of people highly annoyed(% HA) were calculated from the subjective results and compared how many percent of people are annoyed and highly annoyed for the same sound level. As a result of calculating the average, the aircraft noise was highest and the white noise lowest. The relationship between window TL and average point was well correlated except the aircraft noise which was scattered because of high sound level at specific frequency and low TL at corresponding frequency. This means that appropriate rating method for airborne sound transmission should be sought for to evaluate outdoor noise which has different frequency characteristics. The Boltzmann equation for % PA and % HA was applied to predict the sound level corresponding to the percentage. It is concluded that the aircraft noise and road traffic noise have almost same response and the railway noise was same with white noise, used for the reference noise, annoyed lower than other noises about by 3 dB.

Keywords

References

  1. Schultz, T. J., 1978, 'Synthesis of Social Surveys on Noise Annoyance', J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 377-405 https://doi.org/10.1121/1.382013
  2. Schomer, P. D., 2005, 'Criteria for Assessment of Noise Annoynace', Noise Control Eng. J. Vol. 53, No.4, pp, 125-137 https://doi.org/10.3397/1.2839251
  3. Kim, S. W., Lee, J. Y., Song, M. J. and Jang, G. S., 2005, 'A Study on the Indoor Noise Limits of Apartment Houses from the Road Traffic Noise,' Transactions of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering, Vol. 15, No.9, pp. 1084-1091 https://doi.org/10.5050/KSNVN.2005.15.9.1084
  4. Yano, T, Yamashita, T and Izumi, K. 1997, 'Comparison of Community Annoyance from Railway Noise Evaluated by Different Category Scales', J. Sound Vib. Vol. 205, No. 4, pp. 505-511 https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1997.1018
  5. Fields, J. M. and Walker, J. G. 1982. 'Comparing the Relationships between Noise Level and Annoyance in Different Surveys: A Railway Noise vs. Aircraft and Road Traffic Comparison, J. Sound Vib. Vol. 81, No.1, pp.51-80 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(82)90177-8
  6. Kryter, K. D., 1982, 'Community Annoyance from Aircraft and Ground Vehicle Noise', J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Vol. 72, No.4, pp. 1222-1242 https://doi.org/10.1121/1.388332
  7. Osada, Y., 1991, 'Comparison of Community Reaction to Traffic Noise', J. Sound Vib. Vol. 151, No.3, pp, 479-486 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(91)90547-W
  8. Hall, F. L., 1984, 'Community Response to Noise: Is All Noise the Same?' J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Vol. 76, No.4, pp, 1161-1168 https://doi.org/10.1121/1.391408
  9. Miedema, H. M. E. and Henk Vos, 1998, 'Exposure-response Relationships for Transportation Comparison between Laboratory and Field Settings', J. Sound Vib. Vol. 290, No. 6, pp. 3-16
  10. Morihara, T., Sato, T. and Yano, T. 2004, 'Comparison of Dose-response Relationships between Railway and Road Traffic Noises: the Moderating Effect of Distance', J. Sound Vib. Vol. 277, No.3, pp. 559-565 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2004.03.017
  11. Skanberg, A, Ohrstrorn, E., 2006, 'Sleep Disturbances from Road Traffic Noise: A Comparison between Laboratory and Field Settings', J. Sound Vib. Vol. 290, pp. 3-16 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.03.017
  12. Griefahn, B., Marks, A. and Robens, S., 2006, 'Noise Emitted from Road, Rail and Air Traffic and Their Effects on Sleep', J. Sound Vib. Vol. 295, pp. 129-140 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.12.052
  13. Enforcement Regulations of the Noise and Vibration Law, an Act of the Ministry of Environment Issue. 224 Partly Revision, 2006. 12. 29
  14. Enforcement Regulations of the Air Law, An Act of the Ministry of Construction and Transportation Issue. 532, Partly Revision, 2006. 08. 18
  15. Jeon, J. H, An, B. O., Kim, S. W, Song, M. J. and Jang, G. S., 2001, 'A Compare Study on the Evaluation Method of Aircraft Noise', Proceedings of the KSNVE Annual Autumn Conference, p. 703
  16. Kim, S. W., Park, H. K., Jeong, J. Y. and Song, H., 2002, 'A Study on the Evaluation of Sound Insulation Performance for Window through Psycho-acoustic Experiment,' J. AIK, Vol. 18, No.5, pp, 169-176
  17. Jung, G. Y., 2000, 'A Study on the Psychological Evaluation for Environmental Noise Using Korean Vocabulary,' Doc. Dissertation, Chonnam National University
  18. Origin, 1997, 'Origin user's manual version 5', Microcal Software Inc
  19. Yang, B. H., 1998, 'Comprehension and Application of Multivariate Data Analysis', Hakjisa
  20. Schultz, T. J. 1982, 'Community Noise Rating Second ed.,' Applied Science publishers, pp. 239-245