Structural Engineering and Mechanics

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Behavior of tunnel form buildings under quasi-static cyclic lateral loading

  • Yuksel, S. Bahadir (Department of Civil Engineering, Selcuk University) ;
  • Kalkan, Erol (California Geological Survey, Earthquake Engineering Program)
  • Received : 2006.09.12
  • Accepted : 2007.03.02
  • Published : 2007.09.10
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this paper, experimental investigations on the inelastic seismic behavior of tunnel form buildings (i.e., box-type or panel systems) are presented. Two four-story scaled building specimens were tested under quasi-static cyclic lateral loading in longitudinal and transverse directions. The experimental results and supplemental finite element simulations collectively indicate that lightly reinforced structural walls of tunnel form buildings may exhibit brittle flexural failure under seismic action. The global tension/compression couple triggers this failure mechanism by creating pure axial tension in outermost shear-walls. This type of failure takes place due to rupturing of longitudinal reinforcement without crushing of concrete, therefore is of particular interest in emphasizing the mode of failure that is not routinely considered during seismic design of shear-wall dominant structural systems.

Keywords

References

  1. ACI 318-2002 (2002), 'Building code requirements for reinforced concrete and commentary', ACI, Detroit, Michigan, pp.119, 234-236
  2. ACI 318-83 (1983), 'Building code requirements for reinforced concrete and commentary', ACI, Detroit, Michigan, pp.111
  3. Balkaya, C. and Kalkan, E. (2003a), 'Estimation of fundamental periods of shear-wall dominant building structures', Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 32, 985-998 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.258
  4. Balkaya, C. and Kalkan, E. (2003b), ''Nonlinear seismic response evaluation of tunnel form building structures', Comput. Struct., 81, 153-165 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00434-0
  5. Balkaya, C. and Kalkan, E. (2004a), 'Seismic vulnerability, behavior and design of tunnel form buildings', Eng. Struct., 26(14), 2081-2099 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.07.005
  6. Balkaya, C. and Kalkan, E. (2004b), 'Three-dimensional effects on openings of laterally loaded pierced shearwalls', J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 130(10), 1506-1514 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:10(1506)
  7. Ghrib, F. and Mamedov, H. (2004), 'Period formulas of shear-wall buildings with flexible bases', Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 33, 295-314 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.344
  8. Hordijk, D.A. (1991), Local Approach to Fatigue of Concrete, PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology
  9. International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) (1997), Uniform Building Code (UBC), Whittier, Calif
  10. International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) (2000), International Building Code (IBC), Whittier, Calif
  11. Kalkan, E. and Yuksel, B. (2007), 'Pros and Cons of RC tunnel form (Box-type) buildings', Struct. Des. Tall Spec., 16(2)
  12. Lee, L., Chang, K. and Chun, Y. (2004), 'Experimental formula for the fundamental period of RC buildings with shear-wall dominant systems', Struct. Des. Tall Build., 9(4), 295-307
  13. Ministry of Public Work and Settlement. Turkish Seismic Code (TSC) - Specifications for the Structures to be Built in Disaster Regions, Ankara, 1998
  14. Popovics, S. (1973), 'A numerical approach to the complete stress-strain curve for concrete', Cement Concrete Res., 3(5), 583-599 https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(73)90096-3
  15. Thorenfeldt, E., Tomaszewicz, A. and Jensen, J.J. (1987), 'Mechanical properties of high strength concrete and application in deisng', Proc., Symposium 'Utilization of High Strength Concrete', Stavanger, Norway, June, Tapit, Trondheim, 149-159
  16. TNO DIANA, version 8.1, TNO Building Construction and Research, Delft, The Netherlands, 2004
  17. Wood, S.L. (1989), 'Minimum tensile reinforcement requirements in walls', ACI Struct. J., 86(4)
  18. Wood, S.L. (1990), 'Shear strength oflow-rise reinforced concrete walls', ACI Struct. J., 87(1)
  19. Wood, S.L., Stark, R. and Greer, S.A. (1991), 'Collapse of eight-story RC building during 1985 Chile earthquake', J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 117(2), 600-619 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:2(600)
  20. Yuksel, S.B. (2003), 'Experimental investigation of the seismic behavior of panel buildings', PhD Dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara

Cited by

  1. Seismic Performance Evaluation of Asymmetric Reinforced Concrete Tunnel Form Buildings vol.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2017.03.005
  2. Discussion of paper ‘Revisiting Eurocode 8 formulae for periods of vibration and their employment in linear seismic analysis’ by Helen Crowley and Rui Pinho, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2010; 39(2):223-235 vol.40, pp.11, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1080
  3. Structural Behavior of Lightly Reinforced Shear Walls of Tunnel Form Buildings vol.6, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7763/IJET.2014.V6.661
  4. Evaluation of behavior factor of tunnel-form concrete building structures using Applied Technology Council 63 methodology vol.22, pp.8, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.710
  5. Soil-structure interaction effects on the fundamental periods of the shear-wall dominant buildings vol.21, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.611
  6. Seismic performance of a 10-story RC box-type wall building structure vol.9, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.6.1193
  7. Retrofitting of Single Unit Tunnel Form Building Using Steel Plate under Out-of-Plane Lateral Cyclic Loading vol.661, pp.1662-7482, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.661.95
  8. Retrofitting of a Double Unit Tunnel Form Building Using Additional RC Wall, Steel Angle and CFRP vol.661, pp.1662-7482, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.661.123
  9. Safety Guideline for Safe Concrete Placement Utilizing the Information on the Structural Behavior of Formwork vol.144, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001489
  10. Pros and cons of multistory RC tunnel-form (box-type) buildings vol.17, pp.3, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.368
  11. Experimental investigation of retrofitted shear walls reinforced with welded wire mesh fabric vol.70, pp.2, 2007, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.70.2.133
  12. Cyclic tensile testing of a three‐way panel connection for precast wall‐slab‐wall structures vol.20, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201800280
  13. Estimation of seismic response parameters and capacity of irregular tunnel-form buildings vol.17, pp.9, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00679-0
  14. New proposed drift limit states for box-type structural systems considering local and global damage indices vol.22, pp.15, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219863299
  15. Fracture behaviors of tunnel lining caused by multi-factors: A case study vol.8, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2019.8.4.269
  16. Ground-born vibration at multileveled train tunnel crossing vol.73, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.73.4.367
  17. Friction characterization testing of fabric felt material used in precast structures vol.21, pp.2, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201900069
  18. Seismic reliability assessment of RC tunnel-form structures with geometric irregularities using a combined system approach vol.139, pp.None, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106356
  19. Mechanical behavior of a full-scale RC wall-slab connection reinforced with frp under cyclic loading vol.239, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112146
  20. Development of new rectangular rubber isolators for a tunnel-form structure subjected to seismic excitations vol.32, pp.None, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.03.106