Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

Long-term evaluation of implant placed in sites grafed by lateral window approach on maxillary sinus;a 10-year retrospective study

측방 접근법에 의한 상악동 거상술을 이용하여 식립된 골내 임플란트의 10년간 후향적 연구

  • Yon, Je-Young (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Chae, Gyung-Joon (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Jung, Ui-Won (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Cho, Kyoo-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Chong-Kwan (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Chai, Jung-Kiu (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • 연제영 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 채경준 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 정의원 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 김창성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 최성호 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 조규성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 김종관 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 채중규 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소)
  • Published : 2007.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Between 1997 May and 2007 May, One hundred and seventeen patients were treated. There were 129 cases of sinus elevation using a lateral window opening procedure and 258 implants placed simultaneously or delayed. The cumulative survival rate of the implants calculated. The implants were evaluated according to surgical site, quality and quantity of bone, graft material, membrane used, the length and diameter of the implant and complications. 1. The 10-year cumulative survival rate of the implants by sinus augmentation using lateral window approach was 96.90%. 2. There was no difference in the survival rate between the implant placed simultaneously with sinus elevation (one stage) and the procedure performed in the delayed procedure (two stage). 3. There was no difference in the survival rate according to the type and amount of graft materials. 4. There was no difference in the survival rate according to the implant site, bone quality and quantity. 5. There was no difference in the survival rate when the $CollaTape^{(R)}$ or Gore-Tex was placed in the window of the lateral wall. 6. There was no difference in the survival rate of the implant length and diameter. 7. The survival rate was as low as 75.00% when there were more than two complications. Implant placement with sinus augmentation using the lateral window approach is a predictable treatment method. Although the vertical height of residual ridge is insufficient and the quality of bone is poor, the normal survival rate of the implants would be expected if an appropriate graft material and membrane is used with greater effort to prevent complications.

Keywords

References

  1. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-170 https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776
  2. Misch CE. Maxillary sinus augmentation for endosteal implants: organized alternative treatment plans. Int J Oral Implantol 1987;4:49-58
  3. Truhlar RS, Orenstein IH, Morris HF, Ochi S. Distribution of bone quality in patients receiving endosseous dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55:38-45 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(16)31196-X
  4. Smiler DG, Johnson PW, Lozada JL, et al. Sinus lift grafts and endosseous implants. Treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla. Dent Clin North Am 1992;36: 151-186; discussion 187-158
  5. Jemt T, Lekholm U. Implant treatment in edentulous maxillae: a 5-year follow-up report on patients with different degrees of jaw resorption. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:303-311
  6. Misch CE, Qu Z, Bidez MW. Mechanical properties of trabecular bone in the human mandible: implications for dental implant treatment planning and surgical placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;57:700-706; discussion 706-708 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90437-8
  7. Misch CE. Density of bone: effect on treatment plans, surgical approach, healing, and progressive boen loading. Int J Oral Implantol 1990;6:23-31
  8. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980;38:613-616
  9. Tatum H, Jr. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am 1986; 30:207-229
  10. Kim MJ, Jung UW, Kim CS, et al. Maxillary sinus septa: prevalence, height, location, and morphology. A reformatted computed tomography scan analysis. J Periodontol 2006;77:903-908 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.050247
  11. Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compendium 1994;15:152, 154-156, 158 passim; quiz 162
  12. Summers RB. The osteotome technique: Part 3-Less invasive methods of elevating the sinus floor. Compendium 1994;15:698, 700, 702-694 passim; quiz 710
  13. Kang NW, Jung UW, Choi SH, et al. Bone Added Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation with Simultaneous Placement of Branemark Ti-Unite and ITI SLA implants The Journal of Korean academy of periodontology 2005; 35:609-621
  14. Jensen OT, Shulman LB, Block MS, Iacono VJ. Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13 Suppl:11-45
  15. Rosen PS, Summers R, Mellado JR, et al. The bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation technique: multicenter retrospective report of consecutively treated patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:853-858
  16. Kahnberg KE, Ekestubbe A, Grondahl K, Nilsson P, Hirsch JM. Sinus lifting procedure. I. One-stage surgery with bone transplant and implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:479-487 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120508.x
  17. Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, Weinstein R. Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24:565-577
  18. Wallace SS, Froum SJ. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003;8:328-343 https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.328
  19. Froum SJ, Tarnow DP, Wallace SS, Rohrer MD, Cho SC. Sinus floor elevation using anorganic bovine bone matrix (OsteoGraf/N) with and without autogenous bone: a clinical' histologic, radiographic, and histomorphometric analysis-Part 2 of an ongoing prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998;18:528-543
  20. Kent JN, Block MS. Simultaneous maxillary sinus floor bone grafting and placement of hydroxylapatite-coated implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;47:238-242 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(89)90225-5
  21. Tidwell JK, Blijdorp PA, Stoelinga PJ, Brouns JB, Hinderks F. Composite grafting of the maxillary sinus for placement of endosteal implants. A preliminary report of 48 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;21:204-209 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80219-X
  22. Wheeler SL, Holmes RE, Calhoun CJ. Six-year clinical and histologic study of sinus-lift grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:26-34
  23. Wood RM, Moore DL. Grafting of the maxillary sinus with intraorally harvested autogenous bone prior to implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:209-214
  24. Hallman M, Sennerby L, Lundgren S. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:635-643
  25. Jensen OT, Sennerby L. Histologic analysis of clinically retrieved titanium microimplants placed in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:513-521
  26. Lee J-H, Jung U-W, Kim C-S, Choi S-H, Cho K-S. Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Macroporous Biphasic Calcium Phosphate (MBCPTM) . Three Case Report With Histologic Evaluation. The Journal of Korean academy of periodontology 2006;36:567-577 https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2006.36.2.567
  27. Tarnow DP, Wallace SS, Froum SJ, Rohrer MD, Cho SC. Histologic and clinical comparison of bilateral sinus floor elevations with and without barrier membrane placement in 12 patients: Part 3 of an ongoing prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000;20:117-125
  28. Tawil G, Mawla M. Sinus floor elevation using a bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss) with or without the concomitant use of a bilayered collagen barrier (Bio-Gide): a clinical report of immediate and delayed implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:713-721
  29. Scharf DR, Tarnow DP. Success rates of osseointegration for implants placed under sterile versus clean conditions. J Periodontol 1993;64:954-956 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.10.954
  30. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, et al. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-172 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x
  31. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, et al. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:144-153 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130204.x
  32. Branemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue-integrated prostheses : osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago ; London: Quintessence Publishing, 1985
  33. Fugazzotto PA, Vlassis J. Long-term success of sinus augmentation using various surgical approaches and grafting materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13: 52-58
  34. Zitzmann NU, Scharer P. Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla. Comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:8-17 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90391-2
  35. Chace R, Sr., Low SB. Survival characteristics of periodontally-involved teeth: a 40-year study. J Periodontol 1993;64:701 -705 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.8.701
  36. Hurzeler MB, Kirsch A, Ackermann KL, Quinones CR. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with dental implants in the augmented maxillary sinus: a 5-year clinical investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:466-475
  37. Uchida Y, Goto M, Katsuki T, Soejima Y. Measurement of maxillary sinus volume using computerized tomographic images. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:811-818
  38. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25