DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Quantifying the Spatial Heterogeneity of the Land Surface Parameters at the Two Contrasting KoFlux Sites by Semivariogram

세미베리오그램을 이용한 KoFlux 광릉(산림) 및 해남(농경지) 관측지 지면모수의 공간 비균질성 정량화

  • Moon, Sang-Ki (Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, Yonsei Univ.) ;
  • Ryu, Young-Ryel (Biometeorology Lab., Ecosystem Science Division, Dept. of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management (ESPM), Univ. of California) ;
  • Lee, Dong-Ho (Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, Yonsei Univ.) ;
  • Kim, Joon (Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, Yonsei Univ.) ;
  • Lim, Jong-Hwan (Korea Forest Research Institute)
  • 문상기 (연세대학교 대기과학과) ;
  • 류영렬 (미국 캘리포니아 주립대학교 버클리 캠퍼스 환경과학 정책관리학과) ;
  • 이동호 (연세대학교 대기과학과) ;
  • 김준 (연세대학교 대기과학과) ;
  • 임종환 (국립산림과학원, 산림생태과)
  • Published : 2007.06.30

Abstract

The remote sensing observations of land surface properties are inevitably influenced by the landscape heterogeneity. In this paper, we introduce a geostatistical technique to provide a quantitative interpretation of landscape heterogeneity in terms of key land surface parameters. The study areas consist of the two KoFlux sites: (1) the Gwangneung site, covered with temperate mixed forests on a complex terrain, and (2) the Haenam site with mixed croplands on a relatively flat terrain. The semivariogram and fractal analyses were performed for both sites to characterize the spatial heterogeneity of two radiation parameters, i.e., land surface temperature (LST) and albedo. These parameters are the main factors affecting the reflected longwave and shortwave radiation components from the two study sites. We derived them from the high-resolution Landsat ETM+ satellite images collected on 23 Sep. 2001 and 14 Feb. 2002. The results of our analysis show that the characteristic scales of albedo was >1 km at the Gwangneung site and approximately 0.3 km at the Haenam site. For LST, the scale of heterogeneity was also >1 km at the Gwangneung site and >0.6 to 1.0 km at the Haenam site. At both sites, there was little change in the characteristic scales of the two parameters between the two different seasons.

경관의 비균질성은 원격 탐사에 의한 지면 특성 관측에 필연적으로 영향을 준다. 본 연구에서는 주요 지면 모수의 경관 비균질성을 정량적으로 해석할 수 있는 지구통계기법을 소개한다. 연구지역은 두 곳의 KoFlux 연구지로서 (1) 복잡지형의 온대 혼합림으로 구성된 광릉 연구지와 (2) 비교적 평탄한 농경지인 해남 연구지이다. 복사 모수인 지면온도(LST)와 알베도의 공간적 비균질성을 특성화하기 위하여 세미베리오그램과 프랙털 분석을 수행하였다. 이 두 모수는 두 연구지의 상향 장파 및 단파 복사를 결정하는 중요한 인자들이다. 이 모수들은 2001년 9월 23일과 2002년 2월 14일의 두 지역의 고해상도 Landsat ETM+영상에서 추출하였다. 분석 결과, 광릉과 해남 연구지는 알베도의 특성 규모가 각각 1 km 이상 그리고 약 0.3 km 이었다. 지면온도의 경우, 특성 규모는 광릉이 1 km 이상 그리고 해남이 0.6-1.0 km 이상이었다. 두 지면 모수의 특성 규모는 두 지역에서 모두 계절 변화를 보이지 않았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Artis, D. A. and W. H. Carnahan, 1982: Survey of emissivity variability in thermography of urban areas. Remote Sensing of Environment 12(4), 313-329 https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(82)90043-8
  2. Chavez, P. S., 1996: Image-based atmospheric correctionsrevisited and improved. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 62(9), 1025-1036
  3. Choudhury, B. J., N. U. Ahmed, S. B. Idso, R. J. Reginato, and C. S. T. Daughtry, 1994: Relations between evaporation coefficients and vegetation indices studied by model simulations. Remote Sensing of Environment 50(1), 1-17 https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(94)90090-6
  4. Davis, J., 1986: Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, 637 pp
  5. Garrigues, S., D. Allard, F. Baret, and M. Weiss, 2006: Quantifying spatial heterogeneity at the landscape scale using variogram models. Remote Sensing of Environment 103, 81-96 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.03.013
  6. Journel, A. G. and C. J. Huijbregts, 1978: Mining Geostatistics. Academic Press, London, 600 pp
  7. Kim, J., D. Lee, J. Hong, S. Kang, S.-J. Kim, S.-K. Moon, J.-H. Lim, Y. Son, J. Lee, S. Kim, N. Woo, K. Kim, B. Lee, B.-L. Lee and S. Kim, 2006: HydroKorea and CarboKorea: cross-scale studies of ecohydrology and biogeochemistry in a heterogeneous and complex forest catchment of Korea. Ecological Research 21(6), 881-889 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-006-0055-3
  8. Lee, D., J. Kim, S.-J. Kim, S.-K. Moon, J. Lee, J.-H. Lim, Y. Son, S. Kang, S. Kim, K. Kim, and B. Lee, 2007: Lessons from cross-scale studies for Gwangneung forest, Korea: Complex terrain, carbon and water budgets, water use efficiency, and Monsoon. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, this issue https://doi.org/10.5532/KJAFM.2007.9.2.149
  9. Lee, H. C., J. Hong, C. Cho, B. Choi, and J. Kim, 2003: Surface exchange of energy and carbon dioxide between the atmosphere and a farmland in Haenam, Korea. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 5(2), 61-69
  10. Levin, S. A., 1992: The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73, 1943-1967 https://doi.org/10.2307/1941447
  11. Li, F., T. Jackson, W. P. Kustas, T. Schmugge, A. N. French, M. Cosh, and R. Bindlish, 2004: Deriving land surface temperature from Landsat 5 and 7 during SMEX02/ SMACEX. Remote Sensing of Environment 92, 521-534 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.02.018
  12. Liang, S. L., 2004: Quantitative Remote Sensing of Land Surfaces. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey
  13. Markham, B. L. and J. L. Barker, 1986: Landsat MSS and TM post-calibration dynamic ranges, exoatmospheric reflectances and at-satellite temperatures. EOSAT Landsat Technical Notes 1, 3-8
  14. Moon, S.-K., S.-H. Park, J. Hong and J. Kim, 2005: Spatial characteristics of Gwangneung forest site based on high resolution satellite images and DEM. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 7(1), 115-123 (in Korean with English abstract)
  15. Quattrochi, D. A., and M. F. Goodchild, 1997: Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers, 432pp
  16. Ryu, Y., S. Kang, S.-K. Moon, and J. Kim, 2007: Evaluation of moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) driven land surface radiation balance over a complex terrain and a heterogeneous landscape for clear sky days. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, submitted
  17. Sobrino, J. A., N. Raissouni and Z. L. Li, 2001: A comparative study of land surface emissivity retrieval from NOAA data. Remote Sensing of Environment 75(2), 256-266 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00171-1