A Sociological Approach to the Destruction of Ecosystem

생태계 파괴에 대한 사회학적 접근

  • 정대연 (제주대학교 사회학과) ;
  • 장신옥 (제주대학교 사회과학연구소)
  • Received : 2007.05.10
  • Accepted : 2007.05.29
  • Published : 2007.06.30

Abstract

본 연구는 오늘날 범지구적 차원에서 심각한 수준에 있는 생태계 파괴에 대한 사회학적 함의를 정립하는 데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 먼저 생태계의 개념과 구조를 살펴보고, 다음으로 인간활동으로 인한 생태계 파괴의 메커니즘을 분석하고, 마지막으로 그 메커니즘에 기초하여 생태계 파괴에 대한 사회학적 함의를 정립하였다. 생태계로서의 자연은 인간 없이 존재할 수 있지만 인간은 자연 없이는 생존할 수 없다. 따라서 생계위기는 곧 인간의 위기다. 그럼에도 불구하고 18세기 산업혁명 이후 풍요성과 편리성 추구를 위한 인간의 활동 결과 지구는 점용환경용량을 2.5배 초과되었다. 이것은 인간이 범한 모순이다. 이 모순을 해결하면서 사회발전을 추진하자는 이념으로 1987년 지속가능발전이 제창되었고, 지속가능발전은 1990년대 중반에 지속가능사회로 대치되었고, 2000년대에 와서는 지속가능사회가 생태적 근대화로 대체되었다. 18세기 산업혁명 이후 풍요성과 편리성 증대를 위한 인간의 활동으로 생태계가 파괴되기 시작한 후, 생태계를 보전하면서 사회발전을 추진하자는 생태적 근대화 이념이 출현까지의 역사적 과정은 정(正)-반(反)-합(合)의 변증법 과정으로 이론화될 수 있다. 산업혁명 이전의 농업사회 때는 인간의 활동이 점용환경용량 범위 안에서 이루어졌기 때문에 환경문제가 없었다. 이 시대는 생태적 지속가능성이 유지되었기 때문에 생태적 합(合)의 상태라고 할 수 있다. 산업혁명 이후 인간의 활동이 생태계의 점용환경용량을 초월시킨 것은 생태계에 반(反)이 작용한 것이다. 따라서 범지구적 차원에서 환경문제의 심각성을 인식하고 지속가능발전을 위한 정책이 도입되기 이전까지 생태계는 정(正)과 반(反)이 대립상태에서 공존하였다. 1990년대 이후 생태적 지속가능성을 위한 각종 지속가능발전정책의 도입은 정(正)과 반(反)의 대립을 통해 다시 생태학적 합(合)의 상태를 지향하는 과정이라고 할 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Abramson, P. and Inglehart, R., 1995, Value Change in Global Perspective, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press
  2. Ayres, R. U., 2000, Commentary on the Utility of the Ecological Footprint Concept, Economics, 32(2), 347-350
  3. Bauman, Z., 1998, Work, Consumerism, and the New Poor, Buckingham, Open University Press
  4. Beck, U., 1992, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London, Sage Publications
  5. Beckerman, W., 1994, Sustainable Development:Is It a Useful Concept?, Environmental Values, 3, 191-209 https://doi.org/10.3197/096327194776679700
  6. Beckerman, W., 1995, How Would You Like Your Sustainability, Sir? Weak or Strong?: A Reply to My Critics, Environmental Values, 4, 169-179
  7. Bell, S. and Morse, S., 1999, Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?, London, Earthscan Publications Ltd
  8. Bennett, T., Emmison, M., and Frow, J., 1999, Accounting for Taste, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
  9. Berry, T., 1995, Viable Human, Pp. 8-18 in Deep Ecology for the 21st Century, Edited by G. Sessions, Boston, Shambhala Publications, Inc
  10. Bicknell, K. B. et al., 1998, An Indicator of Our Pressure on the Land: New Zealands Ecological Footprint, New Zealand Geographer, 54(2), 4-11 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7939.1998.tb02073.x
  11. Bookchin, M., 1980, Toward an Ecological Society, Montreal: Black Rose Books
  12. Bookchin, M., 1988. Social Ecology versus Deep Ecology, Socialist Review, 19(3), 11-29
  13. Borgstrom, G., 1969, Two Many - A Study of the Earth's Biological Limitations, New York, Macmillan
  14. Buttel, F., 1978, Economic Growth and the Welfare Ttate: Implications for the Future of Environmentalism, Social Science Quarterly, 58, 692-699
  15. Cable, S. and Cable, C., 1995, Environmental Problems Grassroots Solution: The Politics of Grassroots Environmental Conflicts, New York, St. Martin's Press
  16. Catton Jr, W. R., 1997, Redundancy Anxiety, Human EcologyReview, 3(2), 175-178
  17. Catton Jr., W. R. and Dunlap, R. E., 1989, Competing Functions of the Environment: Living Space, Supply Depot and Waste Repository, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Rural Sociological Society, Salt Lake City, Utah
  18. Chambers, N. et al., 2000, Sharing Nature's Interest: Ecological Footprints As an Indicator of Sustainability, London: Earthscan Publications Ltd
  19. Cohen, J. E., 1995, How Many People Can the Earth SupJxJ1t?, New York: W. W. Norton
  20. Commoner, B., 1971, The Closing Circle Confronting, New York: Knof
  21. Costanza, R and Farber, S., 2002, Introduction to the Special Issue on the Dynamics and Value of Ecosystem Services:Integrating Economic and Ecological Perspectives, Ecological Economics, 41, 367-373 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00087-3
  22. Costanza, R., Wainger, L., and Maler, K-G., 1993, Modeling Complex Economic Systems: Towards an Evolutionary, Dynamic Understanding of People and Nature, BioScience, 43, 545-555 https://doi.org/10.2307/1311949
  23. Cotgrove, S. and Duff, A., 1980, Environmentalism, Middle-class Radicalism, and Politics, Socidcgical Review, 28, 33.3-351 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1980.tb00368.x
  24. Daly, H. E., 1995, On Wilfred Beckermans Critique of Sustainable Development, Environmental Values, 4, 49-55 https://doi.org/10.3197/096327195776679583
  25. Dickens, P., 1992, Society and Nature: Towards a Green Social Theory, London, Harvester Wheatsheaf
  26. Dunlap, R. and Van Liere, K., 1978, The New Environmental Paradigm: A Proposed Measuring Instrument and Preliminary Results, Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-19 https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875
  27. Dunlap, R. and Van Liere, K., 1984, Commitment to the Dominant Social Paradigm and Concerns for Environmental Quality: An Empirical Examination, Social Science Quarterly, 65, 1013-1028
  28. Dunlap, R., Van Liere, K., Mertig, A., and Jones, R, 2000, Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale, Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425-442 https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176
  29. Eckersley, R, 1989, Green Politics and the New Class, Political Studies, 37, 205-223 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1989.tb01479.x
  30. Ehrlich, P., 1968, The Population Bomb, New York, Ballantine
  31. Ekins, P., 1994, The Environmental Sustainability of Economic Processes: A Framework for Analysis, Pp. 25-55 in Toward Sustainable Development: Concepts, Methods, and Policy. Edited by J. c. J. M. van den Bergh and J. van der Straaten, Washington, D. c., Island Press
  32. Fine, B. and Leopold, E., 1993, The World of Consumption, London, Routledge
  33. Foster, J. B., 1994, The Vulnerable Planet - A Short Economic History of the Environment, New York, Monthly Review
  34. Freeman, H. M., Puskas, Z., and Olbina, R., 1995, Cleaner Technologies and Cleaner Products for Sustainable Development, New York, Springer
  35. Giddens, A., 1991, Modernity and Sell-Identify, Cambridge, Polity
  36. Goldblatt, D., 1996, Social Theory and the Environment, Oxford, Polity Press
  37. Grimm, N. B., Grove, J. M., Pickett, S. T. A., and Redman, C. L., 2000, Integrated Approaches to Long-Term Studies of Urban Ecological Systems, BioScience, 50, 571-584 https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0571:IATLTO]2.0.CO;2
  38. Harper, C. L., 2004, Environment and Society:Human Perspectives on Environmental Issues (3rd ed.), New Jersey, Upper Saddle River
  39. Hills, P. Welford, R., and Robers, P., 2003, Ecological Modernization, Environmental Reform and the Transformation of Production and Consumption, International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 2(3), 231-236
  40. Howes, D. (ed.), 1996, Cross-Cultural Consumption, London, Routledge
  41. Huber, J., 1985, The Rainbow Society: Ecology and Social Politics, Fisher Verlag: Frankfurt am Main
  42. Jacobs, M., 1995, Sustainable Development, Capital Substitution and Economic Humility: A Response to Beckerman, Environmental Values, 4, 57-68
  43. Jeong, D. Y., 2002, Environmental Sociology, Seoul, Acanet
  44. Jeong, D. Y., 2003, A Sociological Approach to Sustainable Development, Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 12(1), 55-72
  45. Jeong, Y. and Ock, C. S., 1997, Humans and Environment, Seoul, Jigumunhwasa
  46. Johansson, A., 1992, Clean Technology, Boca Raton, Lewis
  47. Jones, C. G. and Lawton, J. H. (eds.), 1995, Linking Species and Ecosystems, New York, Chapman and Hall
  48. Kahn, H. et al., 1979, World Economy Development, 1979 and Beyond, Boulder, West View Press
  49. Kanji, M. and Nevitte, N., 1997, Environmental Support, Concern and Action, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 9(1), 66-76 https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/9.1.66
  50. Kassiola, J. J., 1990, The Death of Industrial Civilization, Albany, State University of New York Press
  51. Kates, R. W., Parris, T. M., and Leiserowitz, A. A., 2005, What is Sustainable Development, Environment, 47(3), 8-21
  52. Kirkwood, R. C. and Longley, A. J. (eds.), 1995, Clean Technology and the Environment, London, Blackie Academic & Professional
  53. Lash, S., Szerszyski, B., and Wynne, B. (eds.), 1996, Risk, Environment, and Modernity, Londonm Sage
  54. Lele, S. M., 1991, Sustainable Development: A Critical Review, World Development, 19(6), 607-621 https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(91)90197-P
  55. Levin, S. A., 1999, Fragile Dominion, Massachusetts, Perseus Books, Readings
  56. Lyon, D., 1999, Postmodernity, Buckingham, Open University Press
  57. Martell, L., 1994, Ecology and Society: An Introduction, Cambridge, Polity Press
  58. McDonald, G. and Patterson, M., 2003, Ecological Footprints of New Zealand and Its Regions, 1997/98, Ministry for the Environment, New Zealand Government
  59. Meadows, D. H. et al, Limit to Growth, New Yark, Universe Books
  60. Meadows, D. H. et al., 1992, Beyond the Limits: Global Collapse or a Sustainable Future, London, Earthscan Publications Limited
  61. Milbrath, L., 1989, Envisioning a Sustainable Society: Learning Our Way Out, Albany, NY, State University of New York Press
  62. Miles, S., 1998, Consumerism as a Way of Life, London, Sage Publications
  63. Miller, D. (ed.), 1995, Acknowledging Consumption, London, Routledge
  64. Moffatt, I., 2000, Ecological Footprints and Sustainable Development, Ecological Economics, 32(3), 359-362 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00154-8
  65. Mullins, P., Jeong, D. Y., Western, J. S., Lowe, I., and Simpson, R., 2004, Consumerism and Sustainable Development, Korean Social Science Journal, 31(1), 1-38
  66. Naess, A., 1995, Self-Realization: An Ecological Approach to Being in the World, Pp. 225-239 in Deep Ecology for the 21st Century, Edited by G. Sessions, Boston, Shambhala Publications, Inc
  67. OECD (Organization far Economic Cooperation and Development), 1995, Technologies for Cleaner Production and Products: Towards Technological Transformation. for Sustainable Development, Paris, Andre-Pascal
  68. Oh, H. S., 1997, Environmental Economics, Seoul, Beurnmun Publication Co
  69. Olsen, M. E. et al., 1992, Viewing the World Ecologically, Boulder, CO, Westview Press
  70. O'Neill, R. V., 2001, Is It Time to Bury the Ecosystem Concept? (With Full Military Honors, of Coursel), Ecology, 82(12), 3275-3284
  71. Orr, D. W., 1979, Modernization and the Ecological Perspective, Pp. 75-79 in The Global Predicament, Edited by D. W. Orr and M. S. Soroos, Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press
  72. Papadakis, E., 1993, Politics and the Environment: The Australian Experience, Sydney, Allen and Unwin
  73. Pezzey, J., 1992, Sustainability: An Interdisciplinary Guide, Environmental Values, 1, 321-362
  74. Pickett, S. T. A. and Gadenasso, M. L., 2002, The Ecosystem as a Multidimensional Concept: Meaning, Model, and Metaphor, Ecosystems, 5, 1-10 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0051-y
  75. Pickett, S. T. A., Parker, V. T., and Fiedler, P. L., 1992, The New Paradigm in Ecology: Implications for Conservation Above the Species Level, Pp. 65-88 in Conservation Biology: 'The Theory and Practice of Nature Conservation, Preservation and Management, Edited by P. L. Fiedler and Jain, New York, Chapman and Hall
  76. Rao, P. K., 2000, Sustainable Development: Economics and Policy, London, Blackwell
  77. Ritzer, G., 1999, Enchanting a Disenchanted World: Revolutionizing the Means of Consumption, Thousand Oaks, Pine Forge Press
  78. Sagoff, M., 1997, Muddle or Muddle Through?, College of Willam and Mary Law Reviews, 38, 825-993
  79. Schnaiberg, A., 1980, The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity, New York, Oxford University Press
  80. Schumacher, E. F., 1973, Small is Beautiful: Economics as If People Really Mattered, London, Abacus
  81. Schot, J., 2001, Towards New Forms of Participatory Technology Development, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 13(1), 39-52 https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320120040437
  82. Scott, D. and Willits, F., 1994, Environmental Attitudes and Behavior, Environment and Behavior, 26, 239-260 https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659402600206
  83. Sklair, L., 1991, Sociology of the Global System, New York, Harvester Wheatsheaf
  84. Skogen, K., 1999, Another Look at Culture and Nature, Acta Sociologica, 42, 223-239 https://doi.org/10.1177/000169939904200303
  85. Soule, M. and Lease, G., 1995, Reinventing Nature?, Washington, D.C, Island Press
  86. Toynbee, A., 1972, The Religion Background of the Present Environmental Crisis, International Journal of Environmental Crisis, 3, 141-146
  87. Tranter, B., 1999, Environmentalism in Australia: Elites and the Public, Journal of Sociology, 35, 321-350 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226799007628
  88. Turner, R. K., 1998, Household Metabolism and Sustainability: Some Introductory Remarks, Pp. 1-6 in Green Households:Domestic Consumers, Environment and Sustainability, Edited by K. J. Noorman and T. S. Uiterkamp, London, Earthscan Publications Ltd
  89. van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. and van der Straaten, J., 1994, Historical and Future Model of Economic Development and Natural Environment, Pp. 209-234 in Toward Sustainable Development:Concepts) Methods) and Policy, Edited by J. C. J. M. van den Bergh and J. van der Straaten, Washington, D. C., Island Press
  90. van Kooten, G. C. and Bulte, E. H., 2000, The Ecological Footprint: Useful Science or Politics?, Ecological Economics, 32(3), 385-389 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00160-3
  91. van Vuuren, D. P. and Smeets, E. M. W., 2000, Ecological footprints of Benin, Bhutan, Costa Rica and the Netherlands, Ecological Economics, 34(1), 115-130 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00155-5
  92. Vegara, J. M., 2000, Footprint Computation: Three Common Errors, presented at World Meeting on Man and City: Towards a Human and Sustainable Development held in Italy in September, 2000
  93. Wackemagel, M. et al., 1993, How Big is Our Ecological Footprint?: A Handbook for Estimating a Community's Appropriated Carrying Capacity (Discussion Draft) for the task Force on Planning Health and Sustainable Communities, Vancouver, Canada
  94. Wackernagel, M. and Yount, J. D., 2002, Footprints for Sustainability: The Next Step, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2, 21-42
  95. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development), 1987, Our Common Future, Oxford, Oxford University Press
  96. White Jr., L., 1967, The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis, Science, 155, 1203-1207 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.155.3759.207
  97. WRI (World Resources Institute), 1992, World Resources 1992-1993: A Guide to the Global Erunnmment, New York, Oxford University Press
  98. WWF (World Wildlife Fund), 2002, Living Planet Report. WWF