DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on Application of Forming Limit Criteria for Formability on Hydroforming Parts

하이드로포밍 부품의 성형성 평가기준 적용 연구

  • Published : 2007.08.01

Abstract

In tube hydroforming process, several defective products could be obtained such as bursting, wrinkling, folding, buckling. Because, especially, bursting is most frequently occurred failure among the well known failures, it is mostly important to predict the onset of bursting failure on tube hydroforming process. For most sheet metal forming processes, strain based forming limit diagram(FLD) is used often as a criteria to estimate the possibility of onset of the failures proposed above. However, FLD has a shortcoming that it is dependent on strain path while stress based diagram is independent on strain history. Generally, tube hydroforming consists of three main processes such as pre-bending, pre-forming, and hydroforming and it means that the strain histories of final products are nonlinear. Therefore, forming limit stress diagram(FLSD) is more suitable to predict forming limit for hydroforming parts. In this study, FLSD is applied to estimate bursting failure for an engine cradle of an automobile part. Consequently, it is proved that application of FLSD to predict forming limit is available for tube hydroforming parts.

Keywords

References

  1. Lucke, H.-U., Hartl, Ch. and Abbey, T., 2001, 'Hydroforming,' J. Mater. Proc. Technol., Vol. 115, pp.87-91 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00774-9
  2. Dohmann, F. and Hartl, Ch., 1996, 'Hydroforming - a Method to Manufacture LightWeight Part,' J. Mater. Proc. Technol., Vol. 60, pp.669-676 https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(96)02403-X
  3. Kim, S.W., Kim, J., Park, H.J. and Kang, B.S., 2004, 'A Prediction of Bursting in Tube Hydrofonning Process Based on Necking Criterions,' Transactions of Materials Processing, Vol 13. No.7, pp.629-634 https://doi.org/10.5228/KSPP.2004.13.7.629
  4. L.P. Lei, J. Kim and B.S. Kang, 2002, 'Bursting Failure Prediction in Tube Hydrofonning Processes by Using Rigid Plastic FEM Combined with Ductile Fracture Criterion,' International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 44, pp. 1411-1428 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(02)00045-0
  5. Thiruvarudchelvan, S., Seet, G.L.and Ang, H.E., 1996, 'Computer-Monitored Hydraulic Bulging of Tubes,' J. Mater. Proc. Technol., Vol. 57, pp.182-188 https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(95)02059-4
  6. Stoughton, T.B. and Zhu, X., 2004, 'Review of Theoretical Models of the Strain-Based FLD and Their Relevance to the Stress-Based FLD,' International Journal of Plasticity, Vol. 20, pp.1463-1486 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2003.11.004
  7. Kim, S.W., Kim, J., Lee, J.H. and Kang, B.S., 2005, 'Forming Limit Prediction in Tube Hydrofonning Processes by Using the FEM and FLSD,' Transactions of Materials Processing, Vol 14. No.6, pp.527-532 https://doi.org/10.5228/KSPP.2005.14.6.527
  8. Fuchizawa, S. and Narazaki, M., 1993, 'Bulge Test for Determining Stress-Strain Characteristics of Thin Tubes,' in: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Technology of Plasticity. Advanced Technology of Plasticity , pp.488-493
  9. Hill, R., 1983, The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity, Oxford University Press, New York