Korean Journal of Community Nutrition (대한지역사회영양학회지)

The Korean Society of Community Nutrition (대한지역사회영양학회)
권호 표지

Factors Affecting Intention to Participate in School Breakfast Programs of Middle and High School Students in Seoul

서울시 중.고등학생들의 학교아침급식 참여 의사에 영향을 미치는 요인

  • Kim, Yang-Suk (Department of Food and Nutrition, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yoon, Ji-Hyun (Department of Food and Nutrition, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Haeng-Ran (Rural Resources Development Institute, National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kwon, Sung-Ok (Rural Resources Development Institute, National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Rural Development Administration)
  • 김양숙 (서울대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 윤지현 (서울대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 김행란 (농촌진흥청 농업과학기술원 농촌자원개발연구소) ;
  • 권성옥 (농촌진흥청 농업과학기술원 농촌자원개발연구소)
  • Published : 2007.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine factors affecting intention to participate in school breakfast programs of middle and high school students in Seoul using the Theory of Planned Behavior. Out of 2,280 questionnaires distributed to the middle and high school students, 2,060 were returned (90.4% response rate) and 1,799 were analyzed (78.9% analysis rate). To determine factors affecting intention to participate in school breakfast programs, logistic regression analyses were conducted for middle and high school students, respectively. For logistic regression, data of 1,217 out of 1,799 students (637 middle and 580 high school students) were used after excluding 582 students which had an answer 'Not sure' to the question about intention to participate in school breakfast programs. In case of middle school students, male than female students (OR = 1.504), the students who skipped all breakfast (OR = 1.851), who ate breakfast $1{\sim}2$ times (OR = 3.474) or $3{\sim}4$ times (OR = 1.950) than those who ate breakfast everyday during weekdays of the previous week were more likely to participate in school breakfast programs. In case of high school students, male than female (OR = 1.967), the students who skipped all breakfast (OR = 4.187), the students who ate breakfast $1{\sim}2$ times (OR = 3.024) or $3{\sim}4$ times (OR = 2.095) than those who ate breakfast everyday during weekdays of the previous week were more likely to participate in school breakfast programs. In addition, both possibility of middle and high school students' participation in school breakfast programs increased as the satisfaction with school lunch service (OR = 1.704, 1.653) increased. Middle school students who perceived their household income level 'low or middle low' (OR = 1.999) than those who perceived their household income level 'middle' and the students who had more positive 'attitude' (OR = 1.311) toward eating breakfast were more likely to participate in school breakfast programs. However, high school students who had higher 'perceived difficulty in access to breakfast' (OR = 1.370) were more likely to participate in school breakfast programs. The results of this study could be useful data to plan and develop school breakfast programs in Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. Ajzen I (1991): The Theory of Planned Behavior. Org Beh Human Decision Processes 50: 179-221 https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. Backman DR, Haddad EH, Lee JW, Johnston PK, Hodgkin GE (2002): Psychosocial predictors of healthful dietary behavior in Adolescents. J Nutr Educ Beh 34: 184-193 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60092-4
  3. Baranowski T, Cullen KW, Baranowski J (1999): Psychosocial correlates of dietary intake: Advancing dietary intervention. Ann Rev Nutr 19: 17-40 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.19.1.17
  4. Berg C, Jonsson I, Conner M (2000): Understanding choice of milk and bread for breakfast among Swedish children aged 11-15 years: an application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Appetite 34: 5­19
  5. Bhattacharya J, Currie J, Haider SJ, Variyam N (2004): Evaluating the impact of school nutrition programs. Final report. Electronic Publications from the Food Assistance & Nutrition Research Program
  6. Bro RT, Shank LL, McLaughlin TF, Williams RL (1996): Effects of a breakfast program on-task behaviors of vocational high school students. J Educ Res 90(2): 111-115 https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1996.9944452
  7. Butcher-Powell LM, Bordi PL, Borja M, Cranage D, Cole C (2003): Factors affecting breakfast intake in children. Top Clin Nutr 18(2): 130-135 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008486-200304000-00009
  8. Choo YJ (2003): Analysis on the factors to improve the quality of school foodservice system-focusing on elementary schools in Incheon-. Catholic University M.S. thesis
  9. Chung SJ, Lee YN, Kwon SJ (2004): Factors Associated with breakfast skipping in elementary school children in Korea. Korean J Comm Nutr 9(1): 3-11
  10. Gleason PM (1995): Participation in the National School Lunch Program and the School Breakfast Program. Am J Clin Nutr 61(suppl): 213S-20S
  11. Gummeson L, Jonsson I, Conner M (1997): Predicting intentions and behaviour of Swedish 10-16-year-olds at breakfast. Food Qual Prefer 8(4): 297-306 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(97)00013-X
  12. Kennedy E, Davis C (1998): US Department of agriculture school breakfast program: Am J Clin Nutr 67(suppl): 798S-803S
  13. Lee HS (2004): Present situation of school meals program and strategies for school breakfast program. J Ind Sci Technol 14: 97­106
  14. Mahon D, Cowan C, McCarthy M (2006): The role of attitudes, subjective norm, perceived control and habit in the consumption of ready meals and takeaways in Great Britain. Food Qual Prefer 17: 474-481 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.06.001
  15. Martens MK, Assema PV, Brug J (2005): Why do adolescents eat what they eat? Personal and social environment predictors of fruit, snack and breakfast consumption among 12-14-year-old Dutch students. Public Health Nutr 8(8): 1258-1265
  16. Masalu JR, Astrom AN (2001): Predicting intended and self-perceived sugar restriction among Tanzanian students using the Theory of Planned Behavior. J Health Psychol 6(4): 435-445 https://doi.org/10.1177/135910530100600406
  17. Maurer KM (1984): The national evaluation of school nutrition programs: factors affecting student participation. Am J Clin Nutr 40:425-447 https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/40.2.425
  18. Meyer MK, Conklin MT (1998): Variables affecting high school students' perceptions of school foodservice. J Am Diet Assoc 88: 1424-1428, 1431
  19. Murphy JM, Pagano ME, Nachmani J, Sperling P, Kane S, Kleinman RE (1998): The relationship of school breakfast to psychosocial and academic functioning: cross-sectional and longitudinal observations in an inner-city school sample. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 152(9): 899-907 https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.152.9.899
  20. Nicklas TA, O'Neil CE, Berenson GS (1998): Nutrient contribution of breakfast, secular trends, and the role of ready-to-eat cereals: a review of data from the Bogalusa Heart Study. A J Clin Nutr 67(suppl): 757S-63S
  21. Oh YM, Kim MH, Sung CJ (2006): The study of satisfaction, meal preference and improvement on school lunch program of middle school boys and girls in Jeonju. J Korean Diet Assoc 12(4): 358-­368
  22. Ottawa Community Research Institute (2007): School breakfast program history [Available online: http.//www.ocri.ca/schoolbreakfastprogram/sbp-history.asp]. 2007.08
  23. Reddan J, Wahlstrom K, Reicks M (2002): Children's perceived benefits and barriers in relation to eating breakfast in schools with or without Universal School Breakfast. J Nutr Educ Behav 34: 47­52
  24. Sampson AE, Meyers A, Rogers BL, Weitzman M (1991): School breakfast program participation and parental attitudes. J Nutr Educ 23: 110-115 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3182(12)80485-7
  25. Shemilt I, Harvey I, Shepstone L, Swift L, Reading R, Mugford M, Belderson P, Norris N, Thobum J, Robinson J (2004): A national evaluation of school brekafast clubs: evidence from a cluster randomized controlled trial and an observational analysis. Child Care Health Dev 30(5): 413-427 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2004.00453.x
  26. Sparks P, Hedderley D, Shepherd R (1992): An investigation into the relationship between perceived control, attitude variability and the consumption of two common foods. Eur J Soc Psychol 22: 55-71 https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420220107
  27. Unusan N, Sanlier N, Danisik H (2006): Comparison of attitudes towards breakfast by Turkish fourth graders living in Turkey and Germany. Appetite 46: 248-253 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2006.01.009
  28. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food and Nutrition Service (2004): Evaluation of the school breakfast program pilot project. [Available online: http://www.fns.usda.gov/oane/MENU/Published/CNP/FILES/SBPPSummary.pdf] 2007.08
  29. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food and Nutrition Service (2007): School breakfast program fact sheet. [Available online: http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/Breakfast/AboutBFast/bfastfacts.htm].2007.06
  30. Verbeke W, Vackier I (2005): Individual determinants of fish consumption: application of the theory of planned behaviour. Appetite 44: 67-82 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2004.08.006
  31. Yi BS (2004): A comparative study on dietary life and recognition of diet related factors in elementary, middle and high school students. J Korean Diet Assoc 10(3): 364-374
  32. Yi BS, Yang IS (2006): An exploratory study for identifying factors related to breakfast in elementary, middle and high school students, Korean J Comm Nutr 11(1): 25-38
  33. Yi NY, Kwak TK, Lee KE (2006): Food habits and nutrient intakes by self-reported food consumption of middle and high school students in Seoul, Gyeonggi, and Gyeongnam Area. Korean J Food Culture 21(5): 473-480
  34. Yoon JH, Choo YJ, Chung SJ, Ryu SH (2005): Satisfaction of elementary students eating school lunch; Association with level of involvement in school lunch service. Korean J Comm Nutr 10(5): 668-676
  35. 보건복지부 (2006): 2005년도 국민건강영양조사.영양조사부문(I)-(정책-식품-2006-53 행정간행물등록번호 11-1460000-000529-12)
  36. 이학식, 안광호, 하영원 (2006): 소비자행동-마케팅 전략적 접근-(제4판) 법문사