Analysis of Research Papers Published in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing

최근 3년간 대한간호학회지 게재 논문의 동향

  • Published : 2007.10.31

Abstract

Purpose: This study was to determine the current trend of nursing research as exploring both quantitative and qualitative methodologies, and to provide the explicit direction to improve the quality of published papers. Methods: Total of 366 articles published between 2004 and 2006 was reviewed using the criteria of analysis. Results: There was more number of quantitative studies than qualitative studies. More studies were conducted with subjects who had health problems, and studies that targeted women and elderly population have been significantly increased. In quantitative methodology, utilization of experimental and quasi-experimental designs has been increased, however descriptive study was dominant as yet. In qualitative methodology, studies using grounded theory and phenomenology were frequently published. It was noted that theoretical framework and rational for sample size were rarely presented in quantitative study. Philosophical position and the process of preparation for study, which guided the research, were not clearly described in qualitative study. Conclusion: The findings of this review suggest that published studies have been improved and diversified, however, detailed and clear evaluation tool that assesses study process and method should be developed as a way to further improve the quality of published papers.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, E. A., McDonald, D. D., Brewer, T., Koscizewski, C., LaCoursiere, S., Andrews, L., & Delaney, C. (2003). Health care implications and space allocation of research published in nursing journals. Nurs Outlook, 51, 70-83 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-6554(02)05451-9
  2. Chang, S. O. (2005). Analysis of papers of the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing according to the knowledge classification type of nursing sciences. J Korean Acad Nurs, 35(1), 206-212
  3. Cho, K. S., Hyun, M. S., & Cho, D. S. (2006). Analysis of review contents of the submitted papers in Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing-focus: The submitted papers in 2003. J Korean Acad Nurs, 36(1), 197-205 https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2006.36.1.197
  4. Choi, K. S., Song, M. S., Hwang, A. R., Kim, K. H., Chung, M. S., Shin, S. R., & Kim, N. C. (2000). The trends of nursing research in the Journal of the Korean Academy of Nursing. J Korean Acad Nurs, 30(5), 1207-1218 https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2000.30.5.1207
  5. Jeong, G. K., Ahn, Y. M., & Cho, D. S. (2005). Coincidence analysis of keywords of the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing with MeSH. J Korean Acad Nurs, 35(7), 1420-1425 https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2005.35.7.1420
  6. Kang, H. C. (2002). Analysis of statistical method in Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing during recent three years. J Korean Acad Nurs, 32(6), 929-935 https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2002.32.6.929
  7. Kim, E. S., Kim, G. S., Kim, D. R., Kim, E. J., Sung, K. M., Shin, H. K., Shin, H. S., Lee, Y. J., & Jeong, S. H. (2004). Trends of nursing science inquiry in doctoral dissertations. J Korean Acad Nurs, 34(2), 315-323 https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2004.34.2.315
  8. Kim, H. W., Chung, M. S., Park, J, S., Suh, Y. O., Suk, M. H., Shin, H. S., Yang, J. H., Jang, H. J., & Jung, M. S. (2007). Developmental direction for review system of the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. J Korean Acad Nurs, 37(3), 422-430 https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2007.37.3.422
  9. Yi, M. S. (2004). Secondary analysis: focusing on qualitative research. J Korean Acad Nurs, 34(1), 35-44 https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2004.34.1.35