Journal of Information Processing Systems

Korea Information Processing Society (한국정보처리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Study on the Educational Use of Home Robots for Children

  • Han, Jeong-Hye (Department of Computer Education, Cheongju Nat'l University of Education) ;
  • Jo, Mi-Heon (Department of Computer Education, Cheongju Nat'l University of Education) ;
  • Jones, Vicki (School of Information Technology, Griffith University) ;
  • Jo, Jun-H. (School of Information Technology, Griffith University)
  • Published : 2008.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), based on already well-researched Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), has been under vigorous scrutiny since recent developments in robot technology. Robots may be more successful in establishing common ground in project-based education or foreign language learning for children than in traditional media. Backed by its strong IT environment and advances in robot technology, Korea has developed the world's first available e-Learning home robot. This has demonstrated the potential for robots to be used as a new educational media - robot-learning, referred to as 'r-Learning'. Robot technology is expected to become more interactive and user-friendly than computers. Also, robots can exhibit various forms of communication such as gestures, motions and facial expressions. This study compared the effects of non-computer based (NCB) media (using a book with audiotape) and Web-Based Instruction (WBI), with the effects of Home Robot-Assisted Learning (HRL) for children. The robot gestured and spoke in English, and children could touch its monitor if it did not recognize their voice command. Compared to other learning programs, the HRL was superior in promoting and improving children's concentration, interest, and academic achievement. In addition, the children felt that a home robot was friendlier than other types of instructional media. The HRL group had longer concentration spans than the other groups, and the p-value demonstrated a significant difference in concentration among the groups. In regard to the children's interest in learning, the HRL group showed the highest level of interest, the NCB group and the WBI group came next in order. Also, academic achievement was the highest in the HRL group, followed by the WBI group and the NCB group respectively. However, a significant difference was also found in the children's academic achievement among the groups. These results suggest that home robots are more effective as regards children's learning concentration, learning interest and academic achievement than other types of instructional media (such as: books with audiotape and WBI) for English as a foreign language.

Keywords

References

  1. Barron, A.E. and Ivers, K.S., 1998, The Internet and Instruction: Activities and Ideas. Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.
  2. Beer, R., 1997, The dynamics of adaptive behavior: a research program, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Vol 20, No. 2, June 1997, pp.257–289 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(96)00063-2
  3. Beer, R., Chiel, H., and Drushel R., 1999, Using autonomous robotics to teach science and engineering, Communications of the ACM, Vol.42, No.5, 85-92 https://doi.org/10.1145/303849.303866
  4. Bushnell L. G. and Crick, A. P. 2003, Control education via autonomous robotics, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Maui, Hawaii), December 2003
  5. Clark, R.V. and Mayer, R.E., 2003, e-Learning and the Science of Instruction, San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  6. Conrad, R.M. and Donaldson, J.A., 2004, Engaging the online learner: activities and resources for creative instruction. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  7. Fong, T., Thorpe, C., Bauer, C., 2001, Collaboration, Dialogue, and Human-Robot Interaction, The 10th International Symposium of Robotics Research, November, Lorne, Victoria, Australia
  8. Fumihide, T., Cicourel, A. and Movellan, J. R., 2007, Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol.104 No.46, November, 13, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707769104
  9. Han, J., Jo, M., Park, S. and Kim, S., 2005, The Educational Use of Home Robots for Children, Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005. ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop, Publication Date: 13-15, pp.378-383, Aug. 2005 https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2005.1513808
  10. Han, J. and Kim D., Field Trial on Robots as Teaching Assistants and Peer Tutors for children, Proceeding of Asia Pacific International Symposium on Information Technology, KIPS, IEEE, 2006.01
  11. Han, J., Cho H., Kim S., Jeong K., The Development of the English Learning Contents Embeded Self-Disclosure Activities in Ubiquitous Home Robots, Proceeding of Asia Pacific International Symposium on Information Technology, KIPS, IEEE, p603-606, 2007.01
  12. Hirst, A. J., Johnson, J., Petre, M, Price, B. A. and Richards, M., 2002, What is the Best Environment-Language for Teaching Robotics Using Lego Mindstorms? Proceedings of The Seventh International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics (AROB-7), Beppu, Oita, Japan, Sugisaka, M. Tanaka, H. (eds.) Journal Artificial Life and Robotics, Issue Vol.7, No.3, pp.124-131, September, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481160
  13. Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., & Ishiguro, H., 2004, Interactive Robots as Social Partners and Peer Tutors for Children:A Field Trial, Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 19, 61-84 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1901&2_4
  14. Kiesler, S. and Hinds, P., 2004, Introduction to This Special Issue on Human-Robot Interaction, Human-Computer Interaction, Vol.19, 1-8 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1901&2_1
  15. Kohlhepp J., 2003, Robot teaches healthy lesson to school kids State agency sponsors more than 500 shows throughout New Jersey, http://nbs.gmnews.com/
  16. Malec, J., 2001, Some Thoughts on Robotics for Education, Proceeding of American Association for Artificial Intelligence Symposium on Robotics and Education, Standford University
  17. Nickels K. and Giolma J.P., 2000, Using Robots to Teach Non-engineers about Science and Technology, Proceedings American Society for Engineering Education-Gulf-Southwest Annal Meeting, Las Cruces, New Mexico, Session 1234
  18. Norman, D., 1986, User-centered Design:New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Engineering in Donald Norman and Stephen Draper(Eds.), Erlbaum Associates:Hillsdale, N.J, 31-62
  19. Ochanomizu University and NEC, 2001, 'How should we look at robots?' retrieved from http://www.nec.co.jp/robot/english/robotcenter_e.html
  20. Price, B.A., Richards M., Petre M., Hirst A. and Johnson J., 2003, Developing robotics e-teaching for teamwork, International Journal of Engineering Eduation and Lifelong Learning, Inderscience Enterprise, vol. 13, No.1/2, 190-205
  21. Scholtz, J., 2003, Theory and Evaluation of Human Robot Interactions, Proceeding of Hawaii International Conference on System Science, 36, Jan https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174284
  22. Scholtz, J. and Bahrami, S., 2004, Human-Robot Interaction: Development of an Evaluation Methodology for the Bystander Role of Interaction, Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on System, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol.4, 3212- 3217
  23. Shin, K.C., 2004, Introduction of Home Robot IROBI, Proceeding of 1st ITRC-IRRC International Workshop on Ubiquitous Robot, KAIST Intelligent Robot Research Center, 121-130
  24. Thrun, S. 2004, Toward a Framework for Human-Robot Interaction, Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 19, 9-24 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1901&2_2
  25. World Technology Evaluation Center [WTEC] Inc. (2006) International Assessment of Research and Development in Robotics: Final Report, January 2006 [http://www.wtec.org/robotics/report/screen-robotics-finalreport.pdf]

Cited by

  1. Facial Recognition Patterns of Children and Adults Looking at Robotic Faces vol.9, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5772/47836
  2. Child–robot interaction across cultures: How does playing a game with a social robot compare to playing a game alone or with a friend? vol.40, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.043
  3. Children’s Cognitive and Behavioral Reactions to an Autonomous Versus Controlled Social Robot Dog vol.27, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2016.1158611
  4. Child-Robot Interactions for Second Language Tutoring to Preschool Children vol.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00073
  5. The Influence of Educational Robot Experience on Children’s Robot Image and Relationship Recognition vol.10, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7746/jkros.2015.10.2.070
  6. Analysis of Virtual Robot Movements for Performance Improvements in Personal Communication vol.90, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-3112-9
  7. Feasibility of Learning by Observing in Collaborative Learning with Robots Which Changes the Learning Method vol.32, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1527/tjsai.D-G51
  8. The Effect of Robots in Education based on STEAM vol.8, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7746/jkros.2013.8.1.058
  9. The Adoption of Instructional Techniques and Educational Technologies among Teaching vol.05, pp.24, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.524230
  10. Robotics as an Educational Tool: Impact of Lego Mindstorms vol.7, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.6.908
  11. Investigating Effectiveness of an Expression Education Support Robot That Nods and Gives Hints vol.21, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.20965/jaciii.2017.p0483
  12. Feasibility of Collaborative Learning with Robots Which Prompts Constructive Interaction vol.31, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1527/tjsai.A-F93
  13. RoboCOP vol.1, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1145/3090092
  14. Psychological Effect in Collaborative learning with Robot using Emotion Expression Model vol.27, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3156/jsoft.27.835
  15. Robot Assisted Instruction in Elementary School Based on Robot Theater vol.23, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2011.p0893
  16. BEST Robotics Practices vol.5, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2015.V5.498
  17. Dyamic Stacked Topic Model vol.31, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1527/tjsai.M-F92
  18. Instructional design using an in-house built teaching assistant robot to enhance elementary school English-as-a-foreign-language learning vol.23, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.792844
  19. The Difference of Excellence in Educational-support Robots Affects Children's Learning English Vocabularies vol.28, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1527/tjsai.28.170
  20. Effects of Familiarity in Collaborative Learning between Human and Robot by Varying Accuracy Rate of a Robot vol.32, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1527/tjsai.C-H13
  21. Long-Term Cohabitation with a Social Robot: A Case Study of the Influence of Human Attachment Patterns vol.10, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0439-2
  22. Improvement of Japanese adults' English speaking skills via experiences speaking to a robot pp.02664909, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12325
  23. Learning by Teaching with Humanoid Robot: A New Powerful Experimental Tool to Improve Children’s Learning Ability vol.2018, pp.1687-9619, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4578762
  24. Social Robots for Early Language Learning: Current Evidence and Future Directions vol.12, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12277
  25. How Could Companion Robots Be Useful in Rural Schools? vol.10, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0460-5
  26. Robot swarms as an educational tool: The Thymio’s way vol.16, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881418825186