Journal of Engineering Education Research (공학교육연구)

Korean Society for Engineering Education (한국공학교육학회)
권호 표지

A Study on Effects of Well-structured Cognitive Reflection Journal on Metacognition and Learning Achievement

구조화된 인지적 성찰일지가 메타인지와 학업성취에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

  • Park, Sun-Hee (Center for Innovative Engineering Education, Dankook University) ;
  • Lee, Seung-Ki (Dept. of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Dankook University) ;
  • Choi, Mi-Na (Dept. of Graduate School of Education, Cheongju University)
  • 박선희 (단국대학교 공과대학 공학교육혁신센터) ;
  • 이승기 (단국대학교 공과대학 전자전기공학부) ;
  • 최미나 (청주대학교 교육대학원)
  • Published : 2008.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze how a well-structured cognitive reflection journal can affect a learner's metacognition and learning achievement in the area of Engineering Education. The objects of this study were 143 students in total (experimental group: 52, control group: 91) who are taking the 'Fundamental Semiconductor Engineering' course in the Engineering Department at D college in the metropolitan area. For his particular study, we undertook three steps as follows. First, we verified that the two groups of students were equal in areas of metacognition and learning achievement. Second, the experimental group was asked to keep writing the well-structured reflection journal for four weeks and the control group was not. Third, we evaluated the metacognition and learning achievement. This study used a questionnaire to measure metacognition by Sperling(2002) in a Korean translation as well as a well-structured cognitive reflection journal. As a result, we found that the well-structured cognitive reflection journal affects learners positively in the sense of metacognition ability, continuity as well as learning achievement.

본 연구의 목적은 공학교육에서 구조화된 인지적 성찰일지 적용이 학습자의 메타인지와 학업성취에 어떤 변화가 나타나는지를 분석해 보는 것이다. 연구대상은 수도권 소재 D대학교 공과대학 '기초반도체공학'을 수강하는 학생 총 143(실험집단 52명, 통제집단 91명)명이다. 연구절차는 먼저 두 집단이 메타인지와 학업성취도 측면에서 동질집단임을 검증한후, 실험집단의 경우 구조화된 성찰일지를 4주간 제공하였고 통제집단의 경우 구조화된 인지적 성찰일지를 제공하지 않았다. 그리고 4주가 지난 후 메타인지와 학업성취도를 측정하였다. 연구도구로는 Sperling(2002)의 메타인지 측정문항을 번안하여 사용하였고, 구조화된 인지적 성찰일지를 사용하였다. 연구결과, 구조화된 인지적 성찰일지 제공이 메타인지 능력 지속성 측면에 긍정적인 영향을 주었고, 학업성취 측면에도 긍정적인 영향을 주었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강인애(1998). PBL과 성찰저널(reflective journal), 산업교육연구, 4:3-27
  2. 곽진숙.최금진(2007). 학생들이 인지한 학습성과달 성도와 학점과의 상관관계 연구. 공학교육연구, 10(1):34-59
  3. 김진수(2007). '공학교육연구'논문들에 대한 연구방 법론과 내용의 분석. 공학교육연구, 10(2):19- 43
  4. 이승희(2002). CSCL에서 협력적 성찰지원 도구의 효과분석. 한양대학교 박사학위논문
  5. 장은호(2007). 블랜디드러닝(Blended Learning)에서 성찰일지의 작성이 학습동기와 학습 결과에 미치는 영향. 한양대학교 석사논문
  6. Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D.(2000). Learning from examples: instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70(2):181-214 https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070002181
  7. Brown, A.(1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser(Ed.). Advances in Instructional Psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  8. Dewey, J.(1997). How we think, Dover Publication
  9. Eraut, M.(1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Falmer Press
  10. Flavell, J. H.(1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring:A new area of cognitivedevelopmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10):906-911 https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
  11. Hatton, N., & Smith, D.(1995). Reflection in teacher education: Toward definition and implementation". Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1):33-49 https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(94)00012-U
  12. Lin, X.(1994). Metacognition: Implications for Research in Hypermedia-Based Learning Environment Proceedings of the 1994 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 16: 483-502
  13. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L.(1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1:117-175 https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
  14. Pollock, E., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J.(2002). Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction, 12:61-86 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00016-0
  15. Schon, D. A.(1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner. CA:Jossey-Bass
  16. Sperling, R.A., Haward, B.C., Miller, L.A. & Murphy, C.(2002). Measures of children's Knowledge and regulation of cognition,Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27:51-79
  17. Sweller, J.(1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning: Cognitive Science, 12:257-285 https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7