The Development of Social Inclusion.Exclusion Indicators - Focused on the Permanent Rental Apartment Dwellers -

사회적 통합.배제 지표 개발을 위한 연구 - 영구임대아파트 거주자를 중심으로 -

  • 김미희 (전남대학교 생활환경복지학과, 생활과학연구소) ;
  • 이민아 (군산대학교 주거 및 실내계획) ;
  • 노세희 (전남대학교 생활환경복지학과)
  • Published : 2008.12.25

Abstract

This study was to develop the indicators for understanding social inclusion exclusion of the dwellers living in permanent rental apartment, and to present a important base about priority order of national housing policy for social inclusion. The ultimate purpose of this study was to provide basic information for the development of permanent rental apartment renewal techniques. The first phase of the study was to review of the social inclusion exclusion indicators mentioned in the literature. The indicators of EU (2001, 2006), KIHASA (2005), and Jehoel-Gijsbers & Brooman (2007), which were applied in many studies about social inclusion, or included various items about dwellers' subjective attitudes, were selected to construct the framework for the study. On the basis of 3 kinds of indicators at the above, the dimensions of social inclusion exclusion were categorized as material deprivation and access to social rights in an economicstructural exclusion view, and social participation and cultural normative accommodations in a socio-cultural exclusion view. And then, the domains of social inclusion exclusion were decided as follows: income, employment, education service, housing, health, family networks and social networks. The detail contents of indicators were adopted from the prior studies as many as possible, and the dwellers' subjective attitudes and housing domains were intensified with reference to UN housing rights and the study of "residents' satisfaction of housing facilities living in permanent rental housing". The developed indicators were modified through the advisory committee that consist of the specialists from the various fields of studies. The final indicators that were overlapped or not able to be measured were eliminated, and added, in a housing domain, the standards of convenient facilities, the management condition, safety, location, crime and etc. in the apartment complex, which were required to complement in the advisory committee.

Keywords

References

  1. 강신욱.김안나.박능후.김은희.유진영(2005), 사회적 배제의 지표개발 및 적용방안 연구, 한국보건사회연구원
  2. 국토연구원(2005), 정기적 주거실태조사 체계 마련을 위한 연구, 국토연구원 전문가 협의회
  3. 김주진.서수정.정경일(2005), 사회통합을 고려한 임대 주택정책 및 개발사례의 특성연구, 대한국토.도시계획학회지 국토계획, 40(6), 159-176
  4. 김준영.김성제.최막중(2005), 임대주택 사회적 혼합의 장애요인과 해소방안에 관한 연구, 대한국토.도시계획학회지 국토계획, 40(5), 153-163
  5. 대한주택공사(2005), 다가구 매입 임대사업의 평가 및 확 대방안, 대한주택공사 연구보고서
  6. 배순석.천현숙.진정수.전성제.김승종 외(2006), 도 시 주거공간의 사회통합 실현방안 연구, 국토연구원
  7. 서수정.김주진.정경일.설정임(2004), 국민임대주택의 사회통합적 계획방안 연구, 대한주택공사
  8. 신명호(2004), 한국사회의 새로운 빈곤 혹은 사회적 배제, 한국도시연구소 도시와 빈곤, 3/4(통권 67호), 160-170
  9. 신명호.하성규.남원석.이 호.홍인옥.김선미(2004), 경제.사회.문화적 권리 국가인권정책기본계획 수립을 위한 주거권 기초현황조사, 국가인권위원회
  10. 신명호 외 7인(2004), 사회적 배제의 관점에서 본 빈곤층 의 실태연구, 국가인권위원회
  11. 신운경.김은미.우현혜.박철수(2008), 주거단지 사회통 합을 위한 해외 건축사례 연구, 대한건축학회논문집 24(2), 13-22
  12. 윤진오 외 편역(2004), 선진국의 빈부격차와 차별시정을 위 한 국가행동계획 사례연구, 국회환경노동위원회
  13. 이종오.조홍식.박태주.김용일(2004), 한국의 사회정책 모델연구: 사회통합의 과제를 중심으로, 정책기획위원회
  14. 정성기(2001), 사회적 혼합이 전제된 공동주택 평형혼합 방 법에 관한 연구, 전남대학교 석사학위논문
  15. 하성규(2005), 한국인의 주거 빈곤과 공공주택, 집문당
  16. 한국주거학회(2007), 주거복지론, 교문사
  17. 홍인옥.남원석.김선미.김윤이.신명호.이 호(2005), 영구임대주택 주거실태조사, 건설교통부
  18. Atkinson, A.B., Marlier, E., & Nolan, B (2004), Indicators and Targets for Social Inclusion in the European Union, JCMS, 42(1), 47-75
  19. Craig Johnson (2002), Housing Policy and Social Mix : an exploratory paper for Shelter New South Wales, Shelter New South Wales
  20. Gerda Jehoel-Gijsbers & Cok Vrooman (2007), Explaining Social Exclusion, The Netherlands Institute for Social Research
  21. Jose Luis Machinea (2007), Measuring and evaluating social cohesion:a preliminary perspective, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), "Social Cohesion. Inclusion and a sense of belonging in Latin America and the Caribbean" Ed
  22. Sarkissian (1976), The Idea of Social Mix in Town Planning: An Historical Review, Urban Studies, 13(3)