DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Spatial Variability in a Korean Paddy Field Using Median Polish Detrending

Median polish 기법을 이용한 한국 논의 공간변이 분석

  • Published : 2008.10.25

Abstract

There is developing interest in precision agriculture in Korea, despite the fact that typical Korean fields are less than 1 ha in size. Describing within-field variability in typical Korean production settings is a fundamental first step toward determining the size of management zones and the inter-relationships between limiting factors, for establishment of site-specific management strategies. Measurements of rice (Oriza Sativa L) yield, chlorophyll content, and soil properties were obtained in a small (100-m by 30-m) Korean rice paddy field. Yield data were manually collected on 10-m by 5-m grids (180 samples with 3 samples in each of 60 grid cells) and chlorophyll content was measured using a Minolta SPAD 502 in 2-m by 2-m grids. Soil samples were collected at 275 points to compare results from sampling at different scales. Ten soil properties important for rice production in Korea were determined through laboratory analyses. Variogram analysis and point kriging with and without median polishing were conducted to determine the variability of the measured parameters. Influence of variogram model selection and other parameters on the interpretation of the data was investigated. For many of the data, maximum values were greater than double the minimum values, indicating considerable spatial variability in the small paddy field, and large-scale spatial trends were present. When variograms were fit to the original data, the limits of spatial dependency for rice yield and SP AD reading were 11.5 m and 6.5 m, respectively, and after detrending the limits were reduced to 7.4 m and 3.9 m. The range of spatial dependency for soil properties was variable, with several having ranges as short as 2 m and others having ranges greater than 30 m. Kriged maps of the variables clearly showed the presence of both large-scale (trend) variability and small-scale variability in this small field where it would be reasonable to expect uniformity. These findings indicate the potential for applying the principles and technology of precision agriculture for Korean paddy fields. Additional research is needed to confirm the results with data from other fields and crops.d similar tendency with the result for the frequency less than 20 Hz, but the width of change was reduced highly.

Keywords

References

  1. Bakhsh, A., D. B. Jaynes, T. S. Colvin and R. S. Kanwar. 2000. Spatio-temporal analysis of yield variability for a cornsoybean field in Iowa. Trans. ASAE 43(1):31-38 https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.2684
  2. Chung, S. O., H. S. Hwang, J. H. Sung, C. K. Lee and I. G. Jung. 2005. Sensor-based measurement of soil properties in a paddy field. Proc. of the Korean Society for Agricultural Machinery Conference 10(1):127-130. (in Korean)
  3. Chung, S. O., L. Y. Kim, I. G. Jung and C. K. Lee. 2006. Analysis of soil compaction using cone index profile. Proc. of the Korean Society for Agricultural Machinery Conference 11(2):24-27. (in Korean)
  4. Hergert, G. W., R. B. Ferguson, C. A. Shapiro, E. J. Penas and F. B. Anderson. 1995. Classical statistical and geostatistical analysis of soil nitrate-N spatial variability. Proc. 2nd Intl. Conf. on Site-Specific Management for Agricultural Systems, P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust, and W. E. Larson (ed.). ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI. pp. 175-185
  5. Hoskinson, R. L., J. R. Hess and R. S. Alessi. 1999. Temporal changes in the spatial variability of soil nutrients. Proc. 2nd European Conf. on Precision Agriculture, J. V. Stafford (ed.). Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield, UK. pp. 61-70
  6. IAS. 1984. Official Soil Series Description: Soil Survey Material No. 10. Institute of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration, Suwon, Republic of Korea
  7. Iida, M., T. Kaho, C. K. Lee, M. Umeda and M. Suguri. 1999. Measurement of grain yields in Japanese paddy field. Proc. 4th Intl. Conf. on Precision Agriculture, P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust, and W. E. Larson (ed.). ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI. pp. 1165-1175
  8. McBratney, A. B. and M. J. Pringle. 1999. Estimating average and proportional variograms of soil properties and their potential use in precision agriculture. Precision Agriculture 1: 125-152 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009995404447
  9. NIAST. 1999. Criteria for crop fertilization. Technical Report, National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Rural Development Administration, Suwon, Republic of Korea
  10. Oliver, M. A. 1999. Exploring soil spatial variation geostatistically. Proc. 2nd European Conf. on Precision Agriculture, J. V. Stafford (ed.). Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield, UK. pp. 3-18
  11. Pozdnyakova, L. and R. Zhang. 1999. Geostatistical analyses of soil salinity in a large field. Precision Agriculture 1:152-165
  12. Sadler, E. J., W. J. Busscher, P. J. Bauer and D. L. Karlen. 1998. Spatial scale requirements for precision farming: a case study in the southeastern USA. Agron. J. 90:191-197 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1998.00021962009000020012x
  13. Sung, J. H. and S. W. Jang. 2006. Variation analysis of elevation within a rice paddy field. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 31(3):188-193. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2006.31.3.188
  14. Srinivasan, A. 1999. Precision farming in Asia: progress and prospects. Proc. 4th Intl. Conf. on Precision Agriculture, P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust, and W. E. Larson (ed.). ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI. pp. 623-627
  15. Webster, R. and M. A. Oliver. 1990. Statistical Methods in Soil and Land Resource Survey. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
  16. Vieira, S. R. 1999. Geostatistical applications in mapping of crop yield and soil properties. Proc. 2nd European Conf. on Precision Agriculture, J. V. Stafford (ed.). Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield, UK. pp. 365-375

Cited by

  1. Spatial Variability of Soil Total Nutrients in a Tobacco Plantation Field in Central China vol.43, pp.14, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2012.689397
  2. Spatial Variability of Soil Properties using Nested Variograms at Multiple Scales vol.39, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2014.39.4.377