Korean Journal of Acupuncture

Society for Meridian and Acupoint (경락경혈학회)
권호 표지

An analytic study of acupoint locations described in "WaHyul" of "ChimGuKyungHumBang" and their modern application

"침구경험방(鍼灸經驗方)" "와혈(訛穴)"의 취혈법(取穴法) 분석에 따른 현대적 적용 연구

  • Lee, Yun-Hee (Dep. of Medical History, College of Oriental Medicine, KyungHee University) ;
  • Cha, Wung-Seok (Dep. of Medical History, College of Oriental Medicine, KyungHee University) ;
  • Kim, Nam-Il (Dep. of Medical History, College of Oriental Medicine, KyungHee University) ;
  • Park, Hi-Joon (Dep. of Meridian and Acupuncture, College of Oriental Medicine, KyungHee University) ;
  • Ahn, Sang-Woo (Korean Institute of Oriental Medicine)
  • 이연희 (경희대학교 한의과대학 의사학교실) ;
  • 차웅석 (경희대학교 한의과대학 의사학교실) ;
  • 김남일 (경희대학교 한의과대학 의사학교실) ;
  • 박히준 (경희대학교 한의과대학 경락경혈학교실) ;
  • 안상우 (한국한의학연구원)
  • Published : 2008.12.27
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives : The objective of this study is to apply the contents of "WaHyul(訛穴 : The errors of acupoint locations"of "ChimGuKyungHumBang" to modern acupoint locations. Methods : The text of "WaHyul" was closely examined and analyzed. "WHO standard acupuncture point locations in the western pacific region" was reviewed based on its contents. Results : According to the analysis, the correct 少商(LU11) was mentioned as a spot appropriately distanced from the corner of the nail root under the skin. This is the most accurate and reasonable synthesis of other related texts. Furthermore, the necessity of defining the locations of all the well points was also emphasized and their locations were mentioned that could be located by the same method. There is no further discussion of other acupoints apart from descriptions of their locations from other texts. Some parts that were pointed out as common errors included not only commonly made mistakes, but errors made in acupuncture texts as were true for 神門(HT7) and 肩井(GB21). The standards of 少商(LU11), 合谷(LI4) and 足三里(ST36) presented in the WHO Standardization are not only similar to what 「WaHyul」 indicated as errors in acupoint locations, but also deviate other acupuncture texts; appropriate corrections must be made. The standard of 肩井(GB21) presents a new acupoint locating method never mentioned before in received classic acupuncture texts and so a rediscussion is in need. Other standards, such as the 絶骨(GB39), had some points of controversy, yet somewhat incomplete while HT7 did not go beyond the bounds of "WaHyul". Conclusions : "WaHyul" can be used to revise WHO standards, and has practical value in modern acupoint locating.

Keywords