Development and Evaluation of SWAT Topographic Feature Extraction Error(STOPFEE) Fix Module from Low Resolution DEM

저해상도 DEM 사용으로 인한 SWAT 지형 인자 추출 오류 개선 모듈 개발 및 평가

  • Received : 2008.05.25
  • Accepted : 2008.07.11
  • Published : 2008.07.30

Abstract

Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model have been widely used in simulating hydrology and water quality analysis at watershed scale. The SWAT model extracts topographic feature using the Digital Elevation Model (DEM) for hydrology and pollutant generation and transportation within watershed. Use of various DEM cell size in the SWAT leads to different results in extracting topographic feature for each subwatershed. So, it is recommended that model users use very detailed spatial resolution DEM for accurate hydrology analysis and water quality simulation. However, use of high resolution DEM is sometimes difficult to obtain and not efficient because of computer processing capacity and model execution time. Thus, the SWAT Topographic Feature Extraction Error (STOPFEE) Fix module, which can extract topographic feature of high resolution DEM from low resolution and updates SWAT topographic feature automatically, was developed and evaluated in this study. The analysis of average slope vs. DEM cell size revealed that average slope of watershed increases with decrease in DEM cell size, finer resolution of DEM. This falsification of topographic feature with low resolution DEM affects soil erosion and sediment behaviors in the watershed. The annual average sediment for Soyanggang-dam watershed with DEM cell size of 20 m was compared with DEM cell size of 100 m. There was 83.8% difference in simulated sediment without STOPFEE module and 4.4% difference with STOPFEE module applied although the same model input data were used in SWAT run. For Imha-dam watershed, there was 43.4% differences without STOPFEE module and 0.3% difference with STOPFEE module. Thus, the STOPFEE topographic database for Soyanggang-dam watershed was applied for Chungju-dam watershed because its topographic features are similar to Soyanggang-dam watershed. Without the STOPFEE module, there was 98.7% difference in simulated sediment for Chungju-dam watershed for DEM cell size of both 20 m and 100 m. However there was 20.7% difference in simulated sediment with STOPFEE topographic database for Soyanggang-dam watershed. The application results of STOPFEE for three watersheds showed that the STOPFEE module developed in this study is an effective tool to extract topographic feature of high resolution DEM from low resolution DEM. With the STOPFEE module, low-capacity computer can be also used for accurate hydrology and sediment modeling for bigger size watershed with the SWAT. It is deemed that the STOPFEE module database needs to be extended for various watersheds in Korea for wide application and accurate SWAT runs with lower resolution DEM.

Keywords

References

  1. 국가수자원관리 종합정보시스템(2002). http://www.wamis.go.kr
  2. 김남원, 이정은(2008). DEM 해상도에 따른 지형인자 및 수문성분의 변화 분석. 학술발표회 논문집, 한국수자원학회, pp. 785-789
  3. 김종건, 박윤식, 허성구, 임경재, 신용철, 김기성, 최중대(2007). SWAT ArcView GIS Extension Patch를 활용한 SWAT 예측유사량 분석. 학술발표회 논문집, 한국농공학회, pp. 117
  4. 김철겸, 김남원, 이정은(2005). SWAT 모형을 이용한 소양강댐 유역의 비점오염 모델링. 학술발표회 논문집, 한국농공학회, pp. 288-293
  5. 박윤식, 김종건, 박준호, 전지홍, 최동혁, 김태동, 최중대, 안재훈, 김기성, 임경재(2007). 임하댐 유역의 유사 거동모의를 위한 SWAT 모델의 적용성 평가. 한국물환경학회지, 23(2), pp. 467-473
  6. 이근상, 고덕구, 박진혁, 황의호(2004). GIS를 이용한 임하호 유역의 토사거동 해석. 수자원 연구원 보고서, KIWECHR-04-04, 한국수자원공사
  7. 양재의, 전만식, 임경재, 김성철, 옥용식, 신효중(2008). 한강탁수저감사업보고서. 한강유역환경청
  8. 정인주, 이정민, 김상용, 이종출(2002). DEM에 의한 지형인자 추출에 따른 격자크기의 영향에 관한 연구. 한국지형공간정보학회, 10(2), pp. 67-75
  9. 한건연, 이수현, 이창희(2003). GIS 자료를 이용한 수문모델링에서의 적정 해상도 도출. 학술발표회 논문집(II), 한국수자원학회, pp. 971-974
  10. 허성구, 김기성, 사공명, 안재훈, 임경재(2005). 고랭지 농경지의 토양유실 모의를 위한 SWAT 모형의 적용성 평가. 한국농촌계획학회지, 11(4), pp. 67-74
  11. 허성구, 유동선, 김재영, 김기성, 안재훈, 박윤식, 김종건, 박준호, 임경재, 최중대(2006). 소유역구분이 SWAT 예측치에 미치는 영향 평가. 한국관개배수학회지, 13(2), pp. 50-62
  12. Feras, M. Z. (2007). Effect of Contour Intervals and Grid Cell Size on the Accuracy of DEMs and Slope Derivatives. Transactions in GIS, 11(1), pp. 67-81
  13. Takagi, M. (1998). Accuracy of Digital Elevation Model According to Spatial Resolution. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 32(4), pp. 613-617