The Perception of the Patients on the Effects of Internet Health Information on the Doctor-Patient Relationship

인터넷 건강정보가 의사-환자 관계에 미치는 영향에 대한 환자들의 인지도 조사

Kim, Jeon-Geun;Jeong, Seong-Hee;Piao, Mei-Hua;Park, Sun-Young;Lee, Sun-Young;Joo, Jee-Young;Kim, Suk-Wha
김정은;정성희;박미화;박선영;이선영;주지영;김석화

  • Published : 20081200

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of the study was to determine patient’s views of the effects of internet health information on the doctor-patient relationship. Methods: Online survey with 26 items was conducted which was developed by revising the questionnaire of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising to accommodate to the internet health information. Members of the active online patients communities were solicited by e-mail. Results: Most of them gave an affirmative answer on Internet Health Information saying that it makes them get advice from doctor with self-confidence, follow their doctor's direction well, get more medical treatment after retrieving the information and so on. By contrast, physicians perceived that internet health information may have variety of negative effects according to the preceding research. Conclusions: There are the differences of perspectives between physicians and patients. Therefore it will be necessary to make the experts' intervention in the provision of internet health information, which will have good effects on quality of care, doctor-patient relationship, and health service utilization.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang NM, Hyun TS, Tack, GR. Needs assessment for health and nutrition information of Korean women through PC communication. J of Korean Academy of Women's Health Nursing 1998;4(3):365-374
  2. Beredjiklian PK, BozentkaDJ, SteinbergDR,Bernstein J. Evaluating the source and content of orthopaedic information on the Internet. The case of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82-A(11):1540-1543
  3. ChungHT,KimJA.Utilization of internet-basedmedical information services and hospital selection among health care consumers: internet survey. J Kor Soc Med Informatics 2005;11(2):125-135
  4. GustafsonDH,HawkinR, Pingree S,McTavish F,Arora NK, Mendenhall J, et al. Effect of computer support on younger women with breast cancer. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16(7):435-445 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016007435.x
  5. in ten internet users have looked for health information online, with increased interest in diet, fitness, drugs, health insurance, experimental treatments, and particular doctors and hospitals. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Healthtopics_ May05.pdf. Accessed January 8th, 2007
  6. 116MillionConsumersOnline forHealth;Multi-Channel Marketing Opportunities Surge Manhattan Research Offering Complimentary Webcasts on November 20th and 21st. Available at: http://www.manhattanresearch. com Accessed January 13th, 2007
  7. Jacob J. Consumer access to health care information: its effect on the physician‐patient relationship. J Alaska Med 2002;44(4):75-82
  8. TatsioniA,Gerasi E, Charitidou E, SimouN,MavreasV, Ioannidis JP. Important drug safety information on the internet: assessing its accuracy and reliability. Drug Saf, 2003;26(7):519-527 https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200326070-00005
  9. Yoo HR. Readability of printed educational materials used to inform computer tomography. J Community Nursing 2001;12(3):670-679
  10. Available at: http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/ news/2000/04/35516. Accessed April 10th, 2000
  11. Pennbridge J, Moya R, Rodrigues L. Questionnaire survey of California consumers' use and rating of sources of health care information including the Internet. West J Med 1999;171:302-305
  12. Huang G.J, Penson DF. Internet health resources and the cancer patient. Cancer Invest 2008;26(2):202-207 https://doi.org/10.1080/07357900701566197