Applicability of Impervious Cover Index for Water Environment Management

물 환경관리를 위한 불투수면 지표의 적용성 연구

  • Choi, Ji-yong (Korea Environment Institute) ;
  • Kim, Byung-ik (Han-River Environmental Research Center, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Park, Baek-soo (Han-River Environmental Research Center, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Chung, Eun-sung (School of Civil, Urban & Geosystem Engineering, Seoul National University)
  • 최지용 (한국환경정책.평가연구원) ;
  • 김병익 (국립환경과학원 한강물환경연구소) ;
  • 박백수 (국립환경과학원 한강물환경연구소) ;
  • 정은성 (서울대학교)
  • Received : 2008.09.23
  • Accepted : 2008.10.21
  • Published : 2008.11.30

Abstract

Studies regarding the application of the impervious cover rate as a watershed management index have increased in number due to concerns over watershed management. The impervious cover rate is suggested as an index that can manage not only water quality but also water volume and the water ecosystem. This study intends to prove its applicability through the interconnection of the impervious cover rate and the water environment in Korea. Analysis of a selected watershed with reference to impervious cover rates showed that a watershed with an impervious cover rate of over 30% had a direct runoff in excess of 60% of precipitation, while a watershed with an impervious cover rate of 7% had a direct runoff of 39%. Watersheds with higher impervious cover rates were also found to have higher BOD, though different watersheds showed slightly different aspects in connection with BOD. Monitoring of benthic macroinvertebrates showed that species inhabiting clean water appear more frequently in areas with lower impervious cover rates than areas with higher impervious cover rates, and in mainstream areas, relatively larger numbers of species appeared in areas with lower impervious cover rates. This suggests that impervious cover rates can be appropriately used as an index for watershed management, as it effectively represents changes to the water environment.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한강수계관리위원회

References

  1. 과천시(2002). 양재천 외 2개 하천 하천정비기본계획(변경)에 따른 사전환경성검토서
  2. 과학기술부(2007). 안양천유역의 물순환 건전화 기술개발. 수자원의 지속적확보기술개발사업단
  3. 배경석 등(2000). 한강 지류천 생태계 조사연구. 서울특별시
  4. 배경석 등(2002). 안양천 생태환경 모니터링. 서울특별시보건환경연구원
  5. 안양시(2002). 안양천살리기 종합계획
  6. 안양시(2003). 안양천 생태환경 모니터링
  7. 안양시(2004). 안양천 생태환경 모니터링
  8. 안양시(2007). 수암천 자연형하천 조성공사 실시설계 보고서
  9. 이기영 등(2006). 2005년 안양천 모니터링. 안양시
  10. 조효섭, 정관수, 김재한(2003). GIUH 적용을 위한 DEM 격자크기 및 Threshhold Area의 민감도 분석. 한국수자원학회논문집, 36, pp. 799-810
  11. 최정권 등(2007). 2006년 안양천 모니터링 연구. 안양시
  12. 현대 Eng.(2005). 안양천유역종합치수계획. 건설교통부
  13. 환경부(2006a). 물환경종합평가방법 개발 조사연구(III)-수생태 건강성조사 및 평가체계 연구
  14. 환경부(2006b). 물환경관리 기본계획
  15. Chaubey, I., Cotter, A. S., Costello, T. A., and Soerens, T. S. (2005). Effect of DEM data resolution on SWAT output uncertainty. Hydrological Processes, 19(3), pp. 621-628 https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5607
  16. CWP (Center for Watershed Protection) (1998). Nutrient Loading from Conventional and Innovative Site Development. Prepared for the Chesapeake Research. Consortium, Annapolis, MD
  17. Schueler, T. (1994). The importance of imperviousness. Watershed Protection Techniques, Center for Watershed Protection, Ellicott City, MD