DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Influence of Global Science Literacy-Oriented Instruction on Students' Views of the Nature of Science

글로벌 과학적 소양 함양을 위한 수업이 학생들의 과학의 본성에 대한 관점에 미치는 영향

  • Yu, Eun-Jeong (Department of Earth Science Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Oh, Hyun-Seok (Department of Earth Science Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Chan-Jong (Department of Earth Science Education, Seoul National University)
  • 유은정 (서울대학교 지구과학교육과) ;
  • 오현석 (서울대학교 지구과학교육과) ;
  • 김찬종 (서울대학교 지구과학교육과)
  • Published : 2008.12.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of global science literacy-oriented instruction on students' views of the nature of science. The participants were 65 male students in 8th grade, and they were taught for five weeks about the Unit of "Earth and Star" that was designed based on global science literacy. Survey was conducted to determine the students' views of the nature of science before and after the instruction. Results revealed that it was hard to change students' views of the nature of science during the short period of time; however, in the sociological aspect, the students acquired relatively more improved students' views of the nature of science than the other aspects including philosophical, psychological, and historical aspects.

본 연구의 목적은 글로벌 과학적 소양 함양을 위한 수업이 학생들의 과학의 본성에 대한 관점에 어떤 영향을 주는지 살펴보는 것이다. 연구 참여자는 8학년 65명의 남학생이며, '지구와 별' 단원에 대하여 5주 동안 글로벌 과학적 소양 수업을 실시하였다. 수업 전과 후에 학생들의 과학의 본성에 대한 이해정도를 살펴보았다. 연구 결과 단기간의 글로벌 과학적 소양 함양을 위한 수업으로 학생들의 과학의 본성에 대한 관점을 변화시키는 것은 어려운 과제임을 확인할 수 있었다. 그러나 사회학적 측면에서, 학생들의 과학의 본성에 대한 이해가 철학적, 심리학적, 역사학적 관점에서 보다 상대적으로 향상된 것을 발견할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강석진, 김영희, 노태희, 2004, 과학사를 이용한 집단 토론수업이 학생들의 과학의 본성에 대한 이해에 미치는 영향. 한구과학교육학회지, 24, 996-1007
  2. 김지영, 강순희, 2007, 가설 연역적 탐구 실험 수업이 학생들의 과학의 본성에 대한 관점에 미치는 영향. 한국과학교육학회지, 27, 169-179
  3. 문병찬, 정진우, 경재복, 고영구, 윤석태, 김해경, 오강호, 2004, 예비교사들의 탄소 순환에 대한 지구시스템의 관련개념과 시스템 사고의 적용. 한국지구과학회지, 25, 684-696
  4. 박길성, 1996, 세계화: 자본과 문화의 구조변동. 사회 비평사, 서울, 366 p
  5. 이수정, 1999, 고등학교 학생들과 예비교사 현직교사의 과학적 소양 평가. 서울대학교 석사학위 논문, 91 p
  6. 정수복, 2002, 시민의식과 시민 참여: 문명전환을 꿈꾸는 새로운 시민운동. 아르케, 서울, 438 p
  7. 정진우, 김윤지, 정구송, 2007, 물의 순환에 대한 예비 지구과학 교사들의 인식. 한국지구과학회지, 28, 697-704
  8. Abd-El-Khalick, F. and Lederman, N.G., 2000, Improving Science Teachers' Conceptions of The Nature of Science: A Critical Review of the Literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665-701 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690050044044
  9. Adist. D.J., 1997, Effects of hypothesis generation on hypothesis testing in rule-discovery tasks. The Journal of General Psychology, 124, 19-34 https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309709595505
  10. Ennis, R.H., 1979, Research in Philosophy of Science Bearing on Science Education. In Asquith, P.D. and Kyburg, H.E. (eds.), Current Research in Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Science Association, 138-170
  11. Heater, D., 1996, World Citizenship and Government: Cosmopolitan Ideas In the History of Western Political Thought. St. Martin's Press. NY, USA, 192 p
  12. Khishfe, R. and Lederman, N., 2006, Teaching nature of Science within a Controversial Topic: Integrated versus nonintegrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 395-418 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20137
  13. Khishfe. R. and Abd-Ei-Khalick. F., 2002, Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of science. Journal of research in Science Teaching, 39, 551-578 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10036
  14. Lederman, N.G. and Zeidler, D.L., 1987, Science Teacher'S Conceptions Of The Nature Of Science: Do They Really Influence Teaching Behavior? Science Education, 71, 721-734 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730710509
  15. Lederman, N.G., 1992, Students' and Teachers' Conceptions of the Nature of Science: A Review of the Research. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 29, 331-359 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290404
  16. Lederman, N.G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.l., and Schwartz, R.S., 2002, Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners' Conceptions of Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497-521 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034
  17. Lee, E.A. and Fortner, R.W., 2006, Development of the K- 12 science Literacy Education Program focused on the Earth System and Environment. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 27, 723-729
  18. Lee, H., 2003, A Comparison of Korean and American Secondary School Students' Understanding about Eath Systems Concepts and Environmental Topics. In Mayer, V.J. (ed.), Global Science Literacy. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 81-91
  19. Lee, H., Forther, R.W., and Mayer, V.J, 2004, Earth systems Education: An Integrated Science Curriculum Construct for Korea. Secondary Education Research, 52, 397-426
  20. Matthews, M., 1994, Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. Routledge, NY, USA, 108 p
  21. Mayer, V.J. and Kumano, Y., 2002, The Philosophy of Science and Global Science Literacy. In Mayer, V.J. (ed.), Global Science Literacy. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 37-49
  22. Mayer, V.J. and Tokuyama. A., 2002, Evolution of global science literacy as a curriculum construct. In Mayer, V.J. (ed.), Global Science Literacy. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 3-24
  23. Mayer, V.J., 1997, Global Science Literacy: An Earth System View. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 101-105 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199702)34:2<101::AID-TEA1>3.0.CO;2-X
  24. Mayer, V.J., 2003, Implementing Global Science Literacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA, 293 p
  25. McComas, W.F and Olson, J.K., 1998, The Nature of Science in International Science Education Standards Documents. In McComas, W.F. (ed.), The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 41-52
  26. McComas, W.F., 1998, The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 365p
  27. McCorquodale, R. and Fairbrother, R., 1999, Glottalization and Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 735-736 https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.1999.0041
  28. Millar, R. and Osborne, J., 1998, Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London University, London, UK, 36 p
  29. Nam, J. and Mayer, V.J., 2002, Assessment In A Global Science Literacy And Korean Context. In Mayer, V.J. (ed.), Global Science Literacy. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 147-156
  30. National Research Council, 1996, National Science education standards. National Academy press, washington, DC, USA, 262 p
  31. Ryder, J. and Leach, J., 1999, University Science Students' Experiences of Investigative Project Work and their Images of Science. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 1069-1084 https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900429448
  32. Waters, M., 1995, Glottalization, Routledge, NY, USA, 185 p