Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea (대한조선학회논문집)

The Society of Naval Architects of Korea (대한조선학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimum Structural Design of Mid-ship Section of D/H Tankers Based on Common Structural Rules

CSR 을 활용한 이중선각유조선 중앙단면의 최적구조설계

  • 나승수 (목포대학교 기계.선박해양공학부) ;
  • 전형근 (대한조선 선체설계팀)
  • Published : 2008.04.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

It is necessary to perform the research works on the general structural designs and optimum structural designs of double hull tankers and bulk carriers due to the newly built Common Structural Rules(CSR). In this study, an optimum structural design of a mid-ship part of double hull oil tanker was carried out by using the CSR. An optimum structural design program was developed by using the Pareto optimal based multi-objective function method. The hull weight and fabrication cost obtained by the single and multi-objective function methods were compared with existing ship by the consideration of CSR and material cost which is recently increasing.

Keywords

References

  1. Korean Register, 2006, Common Structural Rules for Double Hull Oil Tankers
  2. Na, S.S., 2005, "Development of a Multiobjective Function Method Based on Pareto Optimal Point," Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 175-182 https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2005.42.2.175
  3. Na, S.S. and Karr, D.G. , 2002, "Productoriented Optimum Structural Design of Double-Hull Oil Tankers," Journal of Ship Production, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 237-248
  4. Na, S.S., Yum, J.S. and Han, S.M., 2005, "Optimum Structural Design of D/H Tankers by using Pareto Optimal based Multi-objective Function Method," Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 284-289 https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2005.42.3.284
  5. Pareto, V. ,1896, Cours D' Economie Politique, Vols I and II, F. Rouge, Lausanne
  6. Shin, S.H., 2000, Optimum Structural Design of Tankers using Multi-Objective Optimization Technique, PhD. Thesis, Seoul National University

Cited by

  1. Comparison Analysis on Requirements of Structural Members by Application of the Harmonized Common Structural Rules vol.52, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2015.52.3.265