Journal of Information Management (정보관리연구)

Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (한국과학기술정보연구원 과학기술정보센터)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Major Determinants for the Utilization of Technology Roadmap(TRM) in R&D Project - Focused on the Organizational Capability for the Technology Information Use -

기술로드맵(TRM) 추진과 활용의 결정요인에 관한 연구 - 기술정보활용을 위한 조직역량을 중심으로 -

  • Lee, Won-Il (Business Administration, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning(KISTEP))
  • 이원일 (한국과학기술기획평가원)
  • Published : 2008.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This research focused on the major determinants for the technology roadmap utilization of the R&D project after the adoption of the technology roadmap in the R&D intensive organization. The study was performed based on both theoretical study and qualitative case study approaches. The results of this study are summarized as in cases where the R&D project team has higher organizational capability - specifically, relation and research capability, even more technology roadmap is used. In terms of the needs of times, this study regarding the technology roadmap utilization is anticipated to be a good reference for the R&D-oriented organizations and technology-related studies in coming years.

본 연구는 연구개발 조직에서 기술로드맵을 추진한 후 R&D 프로젝트를 수행하는 과정에서 기술로드맵을 실제로 활용(utilization)하게 되는 주요한 결정 요인을 고찰하는 것에 목적을 두어 수행되었다. 이를 위하여 기술로드맵의 개념과 특성을 밝히고 기술로드맵 활용의 주요 요인을 조직역량이론을 중심으로 하여 명제를 도출함과 동시에 사례분석연구를 통하여 기술로드맵 활용의 실제를 분석하였다. 이러한 이론연구와 사례분석을 통하여 기술정보활용을 위한 R&D 프로젝트의 관계구조역량과 연구역이 높을수록 기술로드맵을 활용하며, 기술로드맵 혁신의 속성을 조직 내로 내재화시킬 수 있다는 것을 고찰하였다. 기술로드맵 활용을 위한 조직역량을 실제적으로 분석한 본 연구는 기술로드맵 추진 후에 이를 실제로 활용하려는 연구개발 조직에게 큰 함의를 제공할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 손욱. 2005. 초일류 목표설정의 길. 서울 : 삼성경제연구소.
  2. 박우희. 2002. 기술경제학 개론. 서울 : 서울대학교출판부.
  3. 한국과학기술기획평가원. 2002. 연구기획평가를 위한 방법론 개발 및 사례에 관한 연구. 서울:한국과학기술기획평가원.
  4. 한국과학기술기획평가원. 2005. 미래국가유망기술 21. 서울 : 한국과학기술기획평가원.
  5. 한국과학기술기획평가원. 2007. 국가R&D사업 Total Roadmap. 서울 : 한국과학기술기획평가원.
  6. 한국과학기술기획평가원. 2005. 기술전략맵. 서울:한국과학기술기획평가원.
  7. 한국과학기술기획평가원. 2007. 11차 R&D인력교육, R&D기술경영과정. 서울 : 한국과학기술기획평가원.
  8. Argote. L. 1999. Organizational Learning. Norwell. MA : Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  9. Argote, L. et al. 2000. “Knowledge Transfer : A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(2): 150-169. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2893
  10. Alan, P. et al. 2006. “Management of technology: themes, concepts and relationships.” Technovation, 26: 288-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.01.009
  11. B. Berg. 2004. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  12. Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D.A. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  13. Dennis. 2004. A guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. PA: An American National Standard.
  14. David, R., Donald. S., Mike, M., Robert. H., T.J. Helms. & Daryl Lund. 2002. “Methods in Science Roadmapping, How to Plan Research Priorities.” Science, 280: 803-810.
  15. Emerging Industries, Competitive Australia. 2001. Technology Planning for Business Competitiveness, A Guide to Developing Technology Roadmaps. Occasional Paper.
  16. Fernando, L. 2005. “Technology Roadmapping for Envisioning and Planning Technology, Product, and Organization Development”. 2nd International SEPneT Workshop.
  17. Galvin, R. 2003. “Roadmapping - A practitioners’s update.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 71: 101-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2003.09.007
  18. Giovanni, C. & Pigneur, Y. 2004. Extending Technology Roadmapping For Environmental Analysis, VSST 2004, Toulouse.
  19. Grant. 1996. “Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm.” Strategic Management Journal, 17: 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199602)17:2<109::AID-SMJ796>3.0.CO;2-P
  20. Gregory N. S., Noel P. Greis & W. Fisher. 2001. “Absorptive Capacity and new product development.” Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12: 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(00)00040-7
  21. Irene. J. P. 2006. “Product & Technology Roadmapping: Maximizing Strategic and Organizational Effectiveness”. Workshop Materials, 3-4 April, at Savannah, GA.
  22. Irene. J. P. 2005. “Roadmapping as a mitigator of uncertainty in strategic technology choice.” Portland International Conference on the Management of Engineering and Technology(PICMET).
  23. Irene. J. P. 2003. “Translating Paper Based Roadmaps to Digital Form.” Portland International Conference on the Management of Engineering and Technology(PICMET).
  24. Irene. J. P. & Ann. E. 2004. “Technology roadmapping in review: A tool for making sustaining new product development decisions.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 71: 81-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(03)00064-7
  25. March, J. G. 1991. “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning.” Organizational Science, 2(1).
  26. Mariano N & Pilar. Q. 2005. “Absorptive Capacity, Technological Opportunity, Knowledge Spillovers, and innovative effort.” Technovation, 25: 1141-1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.05.001
  27. Marie, L. G. & Olin, H. B. 1997. “Fundamentals of Technology Roadmapping, Sandia National Laboratory.” SAND, 97-165.
  28. Martin, R. 2004. “Technology Roadmaps: Infrastructure for innovation.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 71: 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2003.10.002
  29. Marylynn, P. & John, F. C. 1999. Emerging Technology Roadmaps: The Battelle Approach. The Joint Global Change Research Institute.
  30. Noordin. S. & Robert, P. l. 2006. “From theory to practice: challenges in operationalizing a technology selection framework.” Technovation, 26: 324-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.10.017
  31. Ozan, S. 2006. PREST Foresight Course, Technology Roadmapping.
  32. Phillip. A., Roussel. K. N., Saad & Tamara. J. E., 1991. Third Generation R&D : Managing the link to the Corporate Strategy. Arthur D. Little, INC.
  33. Podolny, S. & Hannan. 1996. “Networks, Knowledge and niches: Competition in the Worldwide Semiconductor Industry, 1984-1991.” American Journal of Sociology, 102: 659-689. https://doi.org/10.1086/230994
  34. Rachek, G. & Stephen R. 2003. “R&D and Absorptive Capacity.” Scand Journal of Economics, 105(1): 99-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9442.00007
  35. Richey, J. M. & Grinnell, M. 2004. “Evolution of Roadmapping at motorola.” Research-Technology Management, 47(2): 37-45.
  36. Robert, P., Clare J. P. & Farukh. R. 2001. Technology Roadmapping: Linking technology resources to business objectives. University of Cambridge.
  37. Robert, P., Clare J. P. & Farukh. R. 2004. “Technology Roadmapping - A Planning Framework for evolution and revolution." Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 71: 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(03)00072-6
  38. Robert, R. S. 2004. Technological Innovation in the Semiconductor Industries: A case study of the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors(ITRS). Ph.D. Dissertation, George Mason University.
  39. Susan, J. H., Tor G. 2005. “Corporate culture, Absorptive capacity and IT Success.” Information and Organization, 15: 39-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2004.10.002
  40. Susumu, K. & John, M. 2001. An Overview of Technology Roadmapping. Vanderbilt University.
  41. United Nations Industrial Development Organization. 2003. Technology Roadmapping, Foresight Methodologies, Training Module 2.
  42. William L. M. & Langdon. M. 1999. 4th Generation R&D, Managing Knowledge, Technology and Innovation.

Cited by

  1. A Study on the Utilization of the Technology Tree as a Strategic Technology Information Repository - Focused on the Tech-Tree and TRM Integration - vol.39, pp.3, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2008.39.3.205
  2. Performance Evaluation Index of TRM: A Korean Case for SMEs vol.2, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7545/ajip.2013.2.1.063