DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Estimation of Nonlinear Site Effects of Soil Profiles in Korea

국내 지반에서의 비선형 부지효과 예측

  • Published : 2008.03.31

Abstract

In a nonlinear site response analysis which is performed in time domain, small strain damping is modeled as viscous damping through use of various forms of Rayleigh damping formulations. Small strain damping of soil is known to be independent of the loading frequency, but the viscous damping is greatly influenced by the loading frequency. The type of Rayleigh damping formulation has a pronounced influence on the dependence. This paper performs a series of nonlinear analyses to evaluate the degree of influence of the viscous damping formulation on Korean soil profiles. Analyses highlight the strong influence of the viscous damping formulation for soil profiles exceeding 30 m in thickness, commonly used in simplified Rayleigh damping formulation overestimating energy dissipation at high frequencies due to artificially introduced damping. When using the full Rayleigh damping formulation and carefully selecting the optimum modes, the artificial damping is greatly reduced. Results are further compared to equivalent linear analyses. The equivalent linear analyses can overestimate the peak ground acceleration even for shallow profiles less than 20 m in thickness.

시간영역에서 수행되는 비선형 지반응답해석에서 지반의 미소변형률 감쇠는 Rayleigh 감쇠공식을 이용하여 점성감쇠로서 모사된다. 실제 지반의 미소변형률 감쇠는 주파수의 영향을 받지 않는 반면 시간영역해석에서의 점성감쇠는 주파수의 영향을 크게 받으며 이의 영향정도는 Rayleigh 감쇠공식에 따라서 결정된다. 본 연구에서는 국내 지반에 대한 비선형 지반응답해석시 감쇠공식의 영향을 평가하고자 일련의 해석을 수행하였다. 해석결과 점성감쇠공식은 계산된 응답에 매우 큰 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 널리 사용되는 Simplified Rayleigh 공식은 심도 30m 이상의 지반에서 수치적으로 발생하는 인공감쇠로 인하여 고주파수에서의 에너지 소산을 과대예측하는 것으로 나타난 반면, Full Rayleigh 공식을 사용하며 적절하게 최적주파수를 선정한 경우, 인공감쇠는 크게 감소하는 것으로 나타났다. 나아가 해석결과를 등가선형해석과 비교한 결과 20m 미만의 얕은 심도 지반에서도 등가선형 해석은 최대가속도를 과대예측 할 수 있는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Borja, R.D., Duvernay, B.G., and Lin, C.H. (2002), 'Ground response in Lotung: Total stress analyses and parametric studies', Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol.128, No.1, pp.54-63 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:1(54)
  2. Gasparini, D.A., and Vanmarcke, E.H. (1976), 'SIMQKE: A program for artificial motion generation'. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  3. Hashash, Y.M.A., and Park, D. (2001), 'Non-linear one-dimensional seismic ground motion propagation in the Mississippi embayment', Engineering Geology, Vol.62, No.1-3, pp.185-206 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00061-8
  4. Hashash, Y.M.A., and Park, D. (2002), 'Viscous damping formulation and high frequency motion propagation in non-linear site response analysis', Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol.22, No.7, pp.611-624 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00042-8
  5. Idriss, I.M. (1990), 'Response of soft soil sites during earthquakes', Proceedings of the Symposium to Honor H.B. Seed, Berkeley, CA: BiTech Publishers, Vol.2, pp.273-289
  6. Kim, D.-S., Chung, C.-K., Sun, C.-G., and Bang, E.-S. (2002), 'Site assessment and evaluation of spatial earthquake ground motion of Kyeongju', Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol.22, No.5, pp.371-387 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00023-4
  7. Kim, D.S., Stokoe, K.H., and Hudson, W.R. (1991), Deformational characteristics of soils at small to intermediate strains from cyclic tests, Research Report 1177-3, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, pp.1-142
  8. Kramer, S.L. (1996), Geotechnical earthquake engineering, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J., pp.254-305
  9. Matasovic, N. (1993), Seismic response of composite horizontally-layered soil deposits, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, pp.1-452
  10. Matasovic, N., and Vucetic, M. (1995), 'Seismic response of soil deposits composed of fully-saturated clay and sand layers', First International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Tokyo, Japan: JGS, Vol.1, pp.611-616
  11. Ministry of Construction and Transportation of Korea (1997), Seismic design guideline II, pp.215
  12. Park, D., and Hashash, Y.M.A. (2004), 'Soil damping formulation in nonlinear time domain site response analysis', Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol.8, No.2, pp.249-274 https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363246904001420
  13. Rayleigh, J.W.S., and Lindsay, R.B. (1945), The theory of sound, Dover Publications, New York, pp.1-180
  14. Roesset, J.M. (1977), 'Soil amplification of earthquakes', In: C.S. Desai, and J.T. Christian, Eds., Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering. New York: John Wiley
  15. Schnabel, P.B., Lysmer, J.L., and Seed, H.B. (1972), SHAKE: A computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites, EERC-72/12, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA
  16. Sun, C.-G., Kim, D.-S., and Chung, C.-K. (2005), 'Geologic site conditions and site coefficients for estimating earthquake ground motions in the inland areas of Korea;, Engineering Geology, Vol.81, No.4, pp.446-469 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.08.002
  17. Sun, C.G., Bang, E.S., Kim, D.S., Chung, C.K., and Hyun, C.H. (2002), ;Site assessment and evaluation of spatial earthquake ground motion of Kyeongju and Hongsung in Korea', 7th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Boston, CD-ROM, 00395
  18. Vucetic, M., and Dobry, R. (1991), 'Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response', Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol.117, No.1, pp.87-107
  19. Yoon, J.K. (2007), 'Personal Communication'
  20. Yoon, J.K., Kim, D.S., and Bang, E.S. (2006), 'Development of site classification system and modification of design response spectra considering geotechnical site characteristics in Korea', Journal of Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, Vol.10, No.2, pp.39-62 https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2006.10.2.039
  21. Yoshida, N., and Iai, S. (1998), 'Nonlinear site response and its evaluation and prediction', Proc. 2nd International Symposium on the Effect of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion, Yokosuka, Japan, Vol.1, pp.71-90