DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The influence of occlusal loads on stress distribution of cervical composite resin restorations: A three-dimensional finite element study

교합력이 치경부 복합레진 수복물의 응력분포에 미치는 영향에 관한 3차원 유한요소법적 연구

  • Park, Chan-Seok (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Hur, Bock (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyeon-Cheol (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Kwang-Hoon (Department of Mechanical Design engineering, College of Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Son, Kwon (Department of Mechanical Design engineering, College of Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Park, Jeong-Kil (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 박찬석 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 허복 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 김현철 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 김광훈 (부산대학교 공과대학 기계설계공학과) ;
  • 손권 (부산대학교 공과대학 기계설계공학과) ;
  • 박정길 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실)
  • Published : 2008.05.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of various occlusal loading sites and directions on the stress distribution of the cervical composite resin restorations of maxillary second premolar, using 3 dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) analysis. Extracted maxillary second premolar was scanned serially with Micro-CT (SkyScan1072; SkyScan, Aartselaar, Belgium). The 3D images were processed by 3D-DOCTOR (Able Software Co., Lexington, MA, USA). HyperMesh (Altair Engineering, Inc., Troy, USA) and ANSYS (Swanson Analysis Systems, Inc., Houston, USA) was used to mesh and analyze 3D FE model. Notch shaped cavity was filled with hybrid (Z100, 3M Dental Products, St. Paul, MN, USA) or flowable resin (Tetric Flow, Vivadent Ets., FL-9494-Schaan, Liechtenstein) and each restoration was simulated with adhesive layer thickness ($40{\mu}m$). A static load of 200 N was applied on the three points of the buccal incline of the palatal cusp and oriented in $20^{\circ}$ increments, from vertical (long axis of the tooth) to oblique $40^{\circ}$ direction towards the buccal. The maximum principal stresses in the occlusal and cervical cavosurface margin and vertical section of buccal surfaces of notch-shaped class V cavity were analyzed using ANSYS. As the angle of loading direction increased, tensile stress increased. Loading site had little effect on it. Under same loading condition, Tetric Flow showed relatively lower stress than Z100 overall, except both point angles. Loading direction and the elastic modulus of restorative material seem to be important factor on the cervical restoration.

이 연구의 목적은 3차원 유한요소분석법을 사용하여 교합력의 위치와 방향이 상악 제2소구치의 치경부 복합레진 수복물의 응력분포에 미치는 영향에 대해 평가해 보고자 하였다. 발치된 상악 제2소구치를 이용하여 micro-CT (SkyScan1072; SkyScan, Aartselaar, Belgium)로 스캔한 후 HyperMesh Ver 6.0 (Altair Engineering, Inc., Troy, USA)와 3D-DOCTOR (Able Software Co., Lexington, MA, USA)로 3차원 유한요소 모형을 제작하였다. 제작된 소구치 모형에 쐐기형 와동을 형성하고 탄성계수가 서로 다른 혼합형 복합레진과 흐름성 복합레진으로 각각 수복하였다. 수복 후 설측교두의 협측사면 세 위치에 각각 수직, 20도, 40도의 각도로 하중을 가한 후 응력분포를 ANSYS Ver. 9.0 (Swanson Analysis Systems. Inc., Houston, USA) 프로그램을 이용하여 인장 응력의 분포를 분석한 바 하중 위치와 관계없이 하중방향의 각도가 증가할수록, 또한 수복재료의 탄성계수가 높을수록 인장응력도 증가하는 것으로 보아 교합력의 방향과 수복재료의 탄성계수가 치경부 수복물의 응력분포에 중요한 영향을 미치는 요소로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Grippo JO. Abfractions: A new classification of hard tissue lesions of tooth. J Esthet Dent 3:14-19, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1991.tb00799.x
  2. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Stress-induced cervical lesions: Review of advances in the past 10 years. J Prosthet Dent 75:487-494, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90451-5
  3. Telles D, Pegoraro LF, Pereira JC. Prevalence of noncarious cervical lesions and their relation to occlusal aspects: a clinical study. J Esthet Dent 12:10-15, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00193.x
  4. Grippo JO. Tooth flexure (letter). J Am Dent Assoc 122:13, 1991
  5. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Possible role of tensile stress in etiology of cervical erosive lesions of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 52:374-380, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90448-7
  6. Xhonga FA. Bruxism and its effect on the teeth. J Oral Rehabil 4:65-76, 1977 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1977.tb00967.x
  7. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Evaluation of clinical performance for posterior composite resins and dentin adhesives. Oper Dent 12:53-78, 1987
  8. Hood JAA. Experimental studies on tooth deformation: stress distribution in class V restorations. NZ Dent J 68:116, 1972
  9. Morin DL, Douglas WH, Cross M, Delong R. Biophysical stress analysis of restored teeth: experimental strain measurement. Dent Mater 4:41-48, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80087-3
  10. Lee CK, Park JK, Kim HC, Woo SG, Kim KH, Son K, Hur B. The influence of composite resin restoration on the stress distribution of notch shaped noncarious cervical lesion; A three dimensional finite element analysis study. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 32:69-79, 2007 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.1.069
  11. King PA. Adhesive techniques. Br Dent J 186:321-326, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800101a
  12. Grippo JO. Noncarious cervical lesions: the decision to ignore or restore. J Esthet Dent 4(supplement):55-64, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1992.tb00721.x
  13. Blunck U. Improving cervical restorations: a review of materials and techniques. J Adhes Dent 3:33-44, 2001
  14. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 69:1240-1243, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690060301
  15. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative system. J Prosthet Dent 64:658-664, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90291-J
  16. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Three-year clinical effectiveness of four total-etch dentinal adhesive systems in cervical lesions. Quintessence Int 27:775-784, 1996
  17. Rees JS. The effect of variation in occlusal loading on the development of abfraction lesions: a finite element study. J Oral Rehabil 29:188-193, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00836.x
  18. Ichim I, Schmidlin PR, Kieser JA, Swain MV. Mechanical evaluation of cervical glass-ionomer restorations: 3D finite element study. J Dent 35:28-35, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.04.003
  19. Lee HE, Lin CL, Wang CH, Cheng CH, Chang CH. Stresses at the cervical lesions of maxillary premolar - a finite element investigation. J Dent 30:283-290, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00020-9
  20. Borcic J, Anic I, Smojver I, Catic A, Miletic I, Ribaric SP. 3D finite element model and cervical lesion formation in normal occlusion and in malocclusion. J Oral Rehabil 32:504-510, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01455.x
  21. Palamara D, Palamara JE, Tyas MJ, Messer HH. Strain patterns in cervical enamel of teeth subjected to occlusal loading. Dent Mater 16:412-419, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00036-1
  22. Katona TR, Winkler MM. Stress analysis of a bulkfilled class V light-cured composite restoration. J Dent Res 73:1470-1477, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730081201
  23. Geramy A, Sharafoddin F. Abfraction: 3D analysis by means of the finite element method. Quintessence Int 34:526-533, 2003
  24. Lindehe J, Karring T. Textbook of Clinical Periodontology. 2nd edition, Munksgaard, Copenhagen, p19-69, 1989
  25. Schroeder HE, Page RC. Periodontal Diseases. 2nd edition, Lea & Fabiger, Philadelphia, p3-52, 1990
  26. Le SY, Chiang HC, Huang HM, Shih YH, Chen HC, Dong DR, Lin CT. Thermo-debonding mechanisms in dentin bonding systems using finite element analysis. Biomaterials 22:113-123, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00086-7
  27. Grippo JO, Simring M. Dental 'erosion"revisited. J Am Dent Assoc 126:619-630, 1995 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1995.0241
  28. Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Heymann HO. Non-carious cervical lesion. J Dent 22:195-207, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(94)90107-4
  29. Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl L. Characteristics of non-carious cervical lesion. J Am Dent Assoc 133:725-733, 2002 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0268
  30. Widmalm SE, Ericsson SG. Maximal bite force with centric and eccentric load. J Oral Rehabil 9:445-450, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1982.tb01034.x
  31. Gibbs CH, Mahan PE, Lundeen HC, Brehnan K, Walsh EK, Holbrook WB. Occlusal forces during chewing and swallowing as measured by sound transmission. J Prosthet Dent 46:443-449, 1981 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90455-8
  32. Nakamura T, Imanishi A, Kashima H, Ohyama T, Ishigaki S. Stress analysis of metal-free polymer crowns using the three-dimensional finite element method. Int J Prosthodont 14:401-405, 2001
  33. Yettram AL, Wright KW, Pickard HM. Finite element stress analysis of the crowns of normal and restored teeth. J Dent Res 55:1004-1011, 1976 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345760550060201
  34. Goel VK, Khera SC, Ralston JL, Chang KH. Stresses at the dentinoenamel junction of human teeth - A finite element investigation. J Prosthet Dent 66:451-459, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90504-P
  35. Tanaka M, Naito T, Yokota M, Kohno M. Finite element analysis of the possible mechanism of cervical lesion formation by occlusal force.J Oral Rehabil 30:60-67, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.00959.x
  36. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne S, Wilder AD, Sluder TB, Brunson WD. Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations: a two-year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc 122:41-47, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8177(91)25015-1
  37. Xhonga FA, Wolcott RB, Sognnaes RF. Dental erosion II. Clinical measurements of dental erosion progress. J Am Dent Assoc 84:577-582, 1972 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1972.0117
  38. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Brunson WD, Wilder AD, Sluder TB, Bayne SC. Twelve-month clinical study of dental adhesive in class V cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 12:53-78, 1993
  39. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, VerschuerenM, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 73:1690-1702, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730110401
  40. Yaman SD, Sahin M, Aydin C. Finite element analysis of strength characteristics of various resin based restorative materials in class V cavities. J Oral Rehabil 30:630-641, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01028.x
  41. Leinfelder KF. Restoration of abfracted lesions. Compendium 15:1396-1400, 1994
  42. Braga RR, Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL. Contraction stress of flowable composite materials and their efficacy as stress-relieving layers. J Am Dent Assoc 134:721-728, 2003 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0258

Cited by

  1. Finite element analysis of maxillary central incisors restored with various post-and-core applications vol.34, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.4.324