DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

CFD simulations of the flow field of a laboratory-simulated tornado for parameter sensitivity studies and comparison with field measurements

  • Kuai, Le (Iowa State University) ;
  • Haan, Fred L. Jr. (Iowa State University) ;
  • Gallus, William A. Jr. (Iowa State University) ;
  • Sarkar, Partha P. (Iowa State University)
  • Received : 2007.06.27
  • Accepted : 2008.02.15
  • Published : 2008.04.25

Abstract

A better understanding of tornado-induced wind loads is needed to improve the design of typical structures to resist these winds. An accurate understanding of the loads requires knowledge of near-ground tornado winds, but observations in this region are lacking. The first goal of this study was to verify how well a CFD model, when driven by far field radar observations and laboratory measurements, could capture the flow characteristics of both full scale and laboratory-simulated tornadoes. A second goal was to use the model to examine the sensitivity of the simulations to various parameters that might affect the laboratory simulator tornado. An understanding of near-ground winds in tornadoes will require coordinated efforts in both computational and physical simulation. The sensitivity of computational simulations of a tornado to geometric parameters and surface roughness within a domain based on the Iowa State University laboratory tornado simulator was investigated. In this study, CFD simulations of the flow field in a model domain that represents a laboratory tornado simulator were conducted using Doppler radar and laboratory velocity measurements as boundary conditions. The tornado was found to be sensitive to a variety of geometric parameters used in the numerical model. Increased surface roughness was found to reduce the tangential speed in the vortex near the ground and enlarge the core radius of the vortex. The core radius was a function of the swirl ratio while the peak tangential flow was a function of the magnitude of the total inflow velocity. The CFD simulations showed that it is possible to numerically simulate the surface winds of a tornado and control certain parameters of the laboratory simulator to influence the tornado characteristics of interest to engineers and match those of the field.

Keywords

References

  1. Alexander, R.C. and Wurman, J.M. (2005), "The 30 May 1998 Spencer, South Dakota, storm. Part I: the structural evolution and environment of the tornadoes", Mon. Weather Rev., AMS, 133, 72-96. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-2855.1
  2. Bluestein, B.H. and Pazmany, L.A. (2000), "Observations of tornadoes and other convective phenomena with a mobile 3-mm wavelength Doppler radar: The spring 1999 field experiment", Bull. American Meteorological Society, 81, 2939-2951. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<2939:OOTAOC>2.3.CO;2
  3. Church, C.R., Snow, J.T., Baker, G.L. and Agee, E.M. (1979), "Characteristics of tornado-like vortices as a function of swirl ratio: A laboratory investigation", J. Atmos. Sci., 36, 1755-1776. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1979)036<1755:COTLVA>2.0.CO;2
  4. Davies-Jones, P.R. (1973), "The dependence of core radius on swirl ratio in a tornado simulator", J. Atmos. Sci., 30, 1427-1430. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1973)030<1427:TDOCRO>2.0.CO;2
  5. Dessens, J. (1972), "Influence of ground roughness on tornadoes: A laboratory simulation", J. Appl. Meteorol., 11, 72-75. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1972)011<0072:IOGROT>2.0.CO;2
  6. Diamond, C.J. and Wilkins, M.E. (1984), "Translation effects on simulated tornadoes", J. Atmos. Sci., 41(17), 2574-2580. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041<2574:TEOST>2.0.CO;2
  7. Doswell, C.A. and Grazulis, P.T. (1998), "A demonstration of vortex configurations in an inexpensive tornado simulator", Preprints, 19th Conf. Severe Local Storms, Minneapolis, MN, American Meteorological Society, 85-88.
  8. Dowell, D.C., Alexander, C.R., Wurman, J.M. and Wicker, J.L. (2005), "Centrifuging of hydrometeor and debris in tornadoes: radar-reflectivity patterns and wind-measurement errors", Mon. Weather Rev., AMS, 133, 1501-1524. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2934.1
  9. Fluent, Inc. (2005), FLUENT 6.2 User's Guide, Lebanon, NH.
  10. Gallus, Jr., W.A., Sarkar, P.P., Haan, Jr., F.L., Le, K., Kardell, R. and Wurman, J. (2004), "A translating tornado simulator for engineering tests: Comparison of radar, numerical model, and simulator winds", Preprints, 22nd Conf. Severe Local Storms, Hyannis, MA, American Meteorological Society.
  11. Gallus, Jr., W.A., Haan, Jr., F.L., Sarkar, P.P., Le, K. and Wurman, J. (2006), "Comparison of numerical model and laboratory simulator tornado wind fields with radar observations of the Spencer, South Dakota tornado", Symp. on the Challenges of Severe Convective Storms, 86th AMS Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA, American Meteorological Society.
  12. Haan, F.L., Sarkar, P.P. and Gallus, W.A. (2008), "Design, construction and performance of a large tornado simulator for wind engineering applications", Eng. Struct., 30, 1146-1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.010
  13. Hu, M., Xue, M., Brewster, K. and Gao, J. (2004), "Prediction of Fort Worth tornadic thunderstorms using 3DVAR and cloud analysis with WSR-88D Level-II data", Preprints, 22nd Conf. Severe Local Storms, Hyannis, MA, American Meteorological Society, CDROM, J1.2.
  14. Jischke, M.C. and Light B.D. (1983), "Laboratory simulation of tornadic wind loads on a rectangular model structure", Proceedings of the Sixth International Conf. on Wind Engineering, Australia and New Zealand.
  15. Kondo, J. and Yamazawa, H. (1986), "Aerodynamic aerodynamic roughness over an inhomogeneous ground surface", Bound-Lay. Meteorol., 35, 331-348. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118563
  16. Lettau, H. (1969), "Note on aerodynamic roughness-parameter estimation on the basis of roughness-element description", J. Appl. Meteorology, 8, 828-832. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1969)008<0828:NOARPE>2.0.CO;2
  17. Leslie, W.F. (1977), "Surface roughness effects on suction vortex formation", J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 1022-1027. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1977)034<1022:SREOSV>2.0.CO;2
  18. Lewellen, D.C. and Lewellen, W.S. (1997), "Large eddy simulations of a tornado's interaction with the surface", J. Atmos. Sci., 54(5), 581-605. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054<0581:LESOAT>2.0.CO;2
  19. Lewellen, W.S., Lewellen, D.C., Xia, J. (1999), "The influence of a local swirl ratio on tornado intensification near the surface", J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 527-544.
  20. Lewellen, D.C. and Lewellen, W.S. (2007a), "Near-surface intensification of tornado vortices", J. Atmos. Sci., 64(7), 2176-2194. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3965.1
  21. Lewellen, D.C. and Lewellen, W.S. (2007b), "Near-surface vortex intensification through corner flow collapse", J. Atmos. Sci., 64(7), 2195-2209. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3966.1
  22. Stull, R.B. (1988), An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  23. Snow, J.T. and Lund, D.E. (1988), "A second generation tornado vortex chamber at Purdue University", Preprints, 13th Conf. Severe Local Storms, Tulsa, Oklahoma, American Meteorological Society, 323-326.
  24. Simiu, E. and Scanlan, R. H. (1996), Wind Effects on Structures: Fundamentals and Applications to Design, 3rd edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  25. Selvam, R.P. and Millett, P.C. (2003), "Computer modeling of the tornado-structure interaction: investigation of structural loading on cubic building", Wind Struct., 6(3), 209-220. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2003.6.3.209
  26. Sarkar, P.P., Haan, F.L., Gallus, W.A., Kuai, L., Kardell, R., Wurman, J.M. (2005), "A laboratory tornado simulator: comparison of laboratory, numerical and full-scale measurements", 10th Americas Conference on Wind Engineering, Baton Rouge, US, American Association for Wind Engineering.
  27. Ward, N.B. (1972), "The exploration of certain features of tornado dynamics using a laboratory model", J. Atmos. Sci., 29, 1194-1204. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029<1194:TEOCFO>2.0.CO;2
  28. Wilhelmson, R.B. and Wicker, L.J. (2001), "Numerical modeling of severe local storms", Severe Convective Storms, Meteor. Monogr., American Meteorological Society, 28(50), 123-166. https://doi.org/10.1175/0065-9401-28.50.123
  29. Wilkins, M.E., Sasaki, Y., Johnson, H.L. (1975), "Surface friction effects on thermal convection in a rotating fluid: A laboratory simulation", Mon. Weather Rev., AMS, 103, 305-317. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1975)103<0305:SFEOTC>2.0.CO;2
  30. Wurman, J. and Gill, S. (2000), "Finescale radar observations of the Dimmitt, Texas (2 June 1995) tornado", Mon. Weather Rev., AMS, 128, 2135-2164. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<2135:FROOTD>2.0.CO;2
  31. Wurman, J.M. (2002), "The multiple vortex structure of a tornado", Weather Forecas., 17, 473-505. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<0473:TMVSOA>2.0.CO;2
  32. Wurman, J.M. and Alexander, C.R. (2005), "The 30 May 1998 Spencer, South Dakota, storm. Part II: comparison of observed damage and radar-derived winds in the tornadoes", Mon. Weather Rev., AMS, 133, 97-119. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-2856.1

Cited by

  1. Analysis of load characteristics and responses of low-rise building under tornado vol.210, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.062
  2. About choice of particle parameters for visualization and diagnostics of free concentrated air vortices vol.52, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0018151X14040257
  3. Simulation of flying debris using a numerically generated tornado-like vortex vol.99, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2011.01.016
  4. Method of impact on free nonstationary air vortices vol.50, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0018151X12040219
  5. Numerical study on dynamics of a tornado-like vortex with touching down by using the LES turbulence model vol.19, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2014.19.1.089
  6. Effect of net structures on wall-free non-stationary air heat vortices vol.64, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.05.008
  7. Comparison between vortex flow and bottom-supply flow on contaminant removal in a ventilated cavity vol.118, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.10.121
  8. Concentrated air and fire vortices: Physical modeling (a Review) vol.54, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0018151X16030226
  9. Residential Damage Patterns Following the 2011 Tuscaloosa, AL and Joplin, MO Tornadoes vol.8, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2013.p1061
  10. Numerical study on flow fields of tornado-like vortices using the LES turbulence model vol.99, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2011.01.014
  11. Study of the effects of translation and roughness on tornado-like vortices by large-eddy simulations vol.151, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2016.01.006
  12. Study of the vortex principle for improving the efficiency of an exhaust ventilation system vol.142, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.03.007
  13. Analysis of Tornado-Induced Tree Fall Using Aerial Photography from the Joplin, Missouri, and Tuscaloosa–Birmingham, Alabama, Tornadoes of 2011* vol.52, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-12-0206.1
  14. An Eddy Injection Method for Large-Eddy Simulations of Tornado-Like Vortices vol.145, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0339.1
  15. Experimental study of wall-free non-stationary vortices generation due to air unstable stratification vol.55, pp.23-24, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.06.063
  16. Experimental Study on Effects of Ground Roughness on Flow Characteristics of Tornado-Like Vortices vol.162, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0201-6
  17. Rankine combined vortex interaction with a rectangular prism vol.29, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/10618562.2015.1010524
  18. Numerical study of the effects of surface roughness on water disinfection UV reactor vol.148, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.005
  19. Reproducing tornadoes in laboratory using proper scaling vol.135, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2014.10.008
  20. Numerical study of turbulent flow fields and the similarity of tornado vortices using large-eddy simulations vol.145, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.05.008
  21. Large eddy simulations of translation and surface roughness effects on tornado-like vortices vol.104-106, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.05.004
  22. Tornado Vortex Structure, Intensity, and Surface Wind Gusts in Large-Eddy Simulations with Fully Developed Turbulence vol.74, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0258.1
  23. Air tornado-like vortices: Mathematical modeling (a review) vol.55, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0018151X17020201
  24. Doppler radar-derived wind field of five tornado events with application to engineering simulations vol.148, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.068
  25. Numerical simulation of idealised three-dimensional downburst wind fields vol.32, pp.11, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.07.024
  26. Near-Ground Pressure and Wind Measurements in Tornadoes* vol.138, pp.7, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010mwr3201.1
  27. In Situ, Doppler Radar, and Video Observations of the Interior Structure of a Tornado and the Wind-Damage Relationship vol.94, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-12-00114.1
  28. Modeling air and fire non-stationary whirls in laboratory conditions vol.980, pp.None, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/980/1/012019
  29. Topographic effects on tornado-like vortex vol.27, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2018.27.2.123
  30. Influence of a community of buildings on tornadic wind fields vol.30, pp.2, 2008, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2020.30.2.165
  31. POD-based analysis of time-resolved tornado-like vortices vol.33, pp.1, 2008, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2021.33.1.013
  32. Evaluation of a novel curved vortex exhaust system for pollutant removal vol.200, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107931
  33. Wind Flow Characteristics of Multivortex Tornadoes vol.22, pp.3, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000462
  34. Numerical study of tornado-borne debris on a low-rise building through large eddy simulation vol.106, pp.None, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2021.103379
  35. Revealing Bluff-Body Aerodynamics on Low-Rise Buildings under Tornadic Winds Using Numerical Laboratory Tornado Simulator vol.148, pp.3, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0003283