DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Intercomparison of Light Oil Flow Standard System for the Reliability of Measurement Accuracy

경질유 유량표준장치의 신뢰도 검증을 위한 측정정확도 비교

  • 임기원 (한국표준과학연구원, 기반표준본부)
  • Published : 2008.09.01

Abstract

Light Oil Flow Standard System(LOFSS), as a national oil flow standard system, in Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science(KRISS) was developed for oil flowmeter calibration, and the expanded uncertainty of flow quantity determination was estimated within 0.04 %. In order to improve the reliability of the LOFSS measurement, a proficiency test was carried out in the flow range of 20 and $240\;m^3/h$ (Reynolds number $20,000{\sim}900,000$). A turbine flowmeter was used as a transfer package in round robin test. The water flow standard system of KRISS, the pipe prover of the national calibration and test organization and the master meter calibrator of the turbine flowmeter supplier, which used the different working fluid respectively, were compared with the turbine flowmeter measurement. The maximum difference of measurement was 0.15 % between the LOFSS and the pipe prover. The En numbers of the each system measurement were evaluated at the same Reynolds number. It was found that the En numbers were less than 1 in the comparison, which means the procedures of the uncertainty estimation of the each calibrators were reasonable and reliable.

Keywords

References

  1. Ki Won Lim, JongOh Choi, 2003, "A Study on the Development and the Uncertainty Analysis of Oil Flow Standard System," J. of KSME (B), Vol.27, No.8, pp. 1071-1080
  2. ISO, 1993(E), "Guide to The Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement(1st edition)."
  3. Ki Won Lim, JongOh Choi, 2006, "Flow Range Extension of Light Oil Flowmeter Standard System with Build-Up Technique," J. of KSME (B), Vol.30, No.12, pp. 1139-1146 https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-B.2006.30.12.1139
  4. Furuichi N., Terao Y. and Takamoto M., 2007, "A Specification and Uncertainty Evaluation of a High Reynolds Number Calibration Facility," Proceeding of FLOMEKO 2007, Johannesburg, South Africa
  5. Shimada T., Doihara R., Terao Y. and Takamoto M., 2003, "New Primary Standard for Hydrocarbon Flowmeters at NMIJ – International Comparison between NMIJ and SP," Proceeding of FLOMEKO 2003, Groningen, The Netherlands, pp. 187-202
  6. Sam Yong Woo et al, 2006, “Maintenance and Improvement of Mechanical Measurement Standards”, KRISS/IR—2006-053, pp. 176-193, KRISS
  7. ISO 4185, 1980, "Measurement of Liquid Flow in Closed Conduits-Weighing Methods."
  8. Engel R. and Baade H. J., 2007, "Model-based Fluid Diverter Analysis for Improved Uncertainty Determination in Liquid Flow Calibration Facilities, Exemplified with PTB's Hydrodynamic Test Field," Proceeding of FLOMEKO 2007, Johannesburg, South Africa
  9. Kwang-Bock Lee, 2002, "Calibration Procedure of Water Flow Standard System,” DOC. No.C-10-3-0101-2002(E), KRISS
  10. Ruis V. and Hernandez N. C., 2000, "Uncertainty Analysis in Piston Prover Calibration," Proceeding of FLOMEKO 2000, Brazil, pp. 619-624
  11. API, 1978, "Manual of Petroleum Measurement Standards, Chapter 4. Proving System(1st edition)."
  12. JFI standard 1001, 1975, "Meter Accuracy Tests for Liquid Flowmeter-Positive Displacement Flowmeters," Japan Flow Meter Industry Association
  13. Miller R. W., 1996, "Flow Measurement Engineer-ing Handbook(Third edition)," McGraw-Hill, pp. 14.1-14.14
  14. Kaykisizli H., Ciftci V., Karadogan E. and Akselli B., 2003, "Principle of Converting the Mechanical Movement to Electrical Signal by Turbine Meters," Proceeding of FLOMEKO 2003, Groningen, The Netherlands, pp. 665-670