Comparison of Energy Consumption of Reciprocating Gait Orthosis(RGO) and Powered Gait Orthosis(PGO) during Gait

일반보행보조기(RGO)와 동력보행보조기(PGO)의 보행시 에너지 소모도 비교 평가 분석

  • Published : 2008.08.01

Abstract

The aim of this study ultimately is verifying that PGO gait is more efficient than RGO fur paraplegics because the air muscle assists hip flexion power in heel off movement. The gait characteristics of the paraplegic wearing the PGO or RGO are compared with that of a normal person. PGO with air muscles was used to analyze the walking of patients with lower-limb paralysis, and the results showed that the hip joint flexion and pelvic tilt angle decreased in PGO. In comparison to RGO gait, which is propelled by the movements of the back, PGO uses air muscles, which decreases the movement in the upper limb from a stance phase rate of 79$\pm$4%(RGO) to 68$\pm$8%. The energy consumption rate was 8.65$\pm$3.3 (ml/min/Kg) for RGO, while it decreased to 7.21t2.5(ml/min/Kg) for PGO. The results from this study show that PGO decreases energy consumption while providing support for patients with lower-limb paralysis, and it is helpful in walking for extended times.

Keywords

References

  1. Douglas, R., Larson, P. F., Ambrosia, R. and McCall, R. E., "The LSU reciprocation gait orthosis," Ortho- pedics, Vol. 6, pp. 834-839, 1983
  2. Ruthenberg, R. M., Neil, A. W. and John, E. B., "An experimental device for investigating the force and power equirements of a powered gait orthosis," J. of Rehabilitation, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 203-213, 1997
  3. Kang, S. J., Ryu, J. C., Kim, G. S. and Mun, M. S., "Hip Joint Control of POG's Gait for paraplegic," Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 326, No. 1, pp. 735-738, 2006 https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.326-328.735
  4. http://www.ottobockus.com/PRODUCTS/CUSTOM_ORTHOTICS/unilateral_joint_system.asp
  5. http://www.beckerorthopedic.com/rgo/rgo.htm
  6. Chou, C. P. and Hanaford, B., "Measurement and Modeling of McKibben Pneumatic Artificial Muscles," IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 90-102, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1109/70.481753
  7. Mudi, R. K. and Pal, N. R., "A robust self-tuning scheme for PI- and PD type fuzzy controllers," IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 2-16, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1109/91.746295
  8. Labrosse, J. J., "MicroC/OS-II, The Real-Time Kernel 2nd ed," CMP Books, pp. 73-336, 1990
  9. Crandall, C., Taylor, S. and Raven, P., "Evaluation of the Cosmed K2 portable telemetric oxygen uptake analyzer," Med Sci Sports Exercise, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 108-111, 1994
  10. Saunders, J. B. D. M., Inman, V. T. and Elberhart, H. S., "The major determinants in normal and pathological gait," Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 543-558, 1953 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-195335030-00003