Korean Journal of Applied Biomechanics (한국운동역학회지)

Korean Society of Applied Biomechanics (한국운동역학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Biomechanical Research for Incorates a Rounded Sole with a 20 Degree Heel Lift in Functional Shoes

후족부 경사각을 이용한 신발에 관한 생체역학적 연구

  • Published : 2008.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The primary innovation in the new footwear is a heel lift of $20^{\circ}$ which is proposed to improve posture and balance as well as increase shock absorption. The purpose of this research was to compare the movement, forces and muscle activity between the new shoes and standard athletic footwear during standing and walking. Nine healthy subjects participated in this study. Data were collected at two times: 1) when the subjects first wore the new walking shoes and 2) after the subjects wore the shoes for 6 hours a day for two weeks. 1. During standing. the movement of the center of pressure is increased approximately 60% when wearing the new walking shoes compared to a control shoe. 2. During walking. the ankle is approximately $14^{\circ}$ more dorsiflexed during landing due to the 200heel lift in the new walking shoes. The knee compensates slightly by flexing approximately $2^{\circ}$ more. 3. As a result of the changes in the walking movement, the ground reaction forces are applied more quickly, although the peak magnitudes do rut change. 4. The resultant joint moments at the ankle and knee joints decrease from 21-60% with the largest reductions occurring during landing. In conclusion, the new footwear change the movement, showing a more upright stance. Also, the new footwear reduce joint loading at the joint during the landing and weight acceptance phase of walking. However, the influence of the new footwear is immediate and does rut change after wearing the shoes for two weeks.

본 연구는 9명의 피험자가 2주간 하루 6시간동안 후족부 경사각을 이용한 신발인 S사(社) 신발을 착용하여 보행하였으며 신발을 처음 신었을 때와 2주간 하루 6시간 이상 착용한 후의 데이터를 통해 기존의 운동화와 S사(社) 신발간의 비교를 수행하였다. 1. 기립자세에서의 S사(社) 신발의 착용 시 근전도의 활동인 증가하고 압력분포 중심 움직임은 약 60% 정도 증가하였다. 2. 피험자의 보행 시 S사(社) 신발을 착용하였을 때 신발의 힐 부부분의 $20^{\circ}$ 경사각으로 인해 heel strike 시 발목이 약 $14^{\circ}$ 정도 발등 쪽으로 굽혀짐을 확인하였으며 무릎에서는 이를 보완하기 위해 $2^{\circ}$ 정도 굴곡 됨을 보였다. 3. 이로 인해 최대 지면반력이 보다 빠르게 나타났으나 크기는 변하지 않았다. 4. S사(社) 신발의 착용하고 보행 시 지지기에서 발목과 무릎의 부하는 21-61%의 감소하는 결과를 나타내었다. 결과적으로 S사(社) 신발 착용시 목과 무릎각의 굴곡 각을 증가시켜 보행 시 몸이 곧게 서도록 하였다. 또한 보행 시 부하를 감소시킬 수 있음을 나타냈으나 2주간의 신발 착용으로 인한 신체의 변화는 나타나지 않음을 보였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강지은(2006). 신발의 아웃 솔 구조에 따른 걷기전략의 즉각적인 차이. 미간행 석사학위논문, 이화여자대학교 대학원.
  2. 김연정, 채원식(2007). 유선형 후방 밸런스 신발과 일반신발의 족저압 비교. 한국운동역학회, 17(3), 173-100.
  3. 김연정(2007). 유선형 후방 밸런스 신발 착용 시 보행의 생체역학적 분석, 미간행 박사학위논문. 경북대학교대학원.
  4. 박기란, 안송이, 이기광(2006). 12주간의 불안정성 신발 착용이 직립 자세 및 보행역학에 미치는 영향. 한국운동역학회지, 16(3), 165-172.
  5. 안송이, 김상범, 이기광(2007). 신발 아웃솔의 굴곡 형태에 따른 하지근육활동의 특성과 보행 패턴의 비교연구, 한국운동역학회지, 17(1), 111-119.
  6. 이경옥(2005). 발끝이 최대 높이까지 올라간 워킹화가 신체구성, 체력, 건강관련 변인에 미치는 영향, 한국여성체육학회지, 16(3), 165-172.
  7. 최규정(2003). 일반 운동화와 mBT 보행 신발 착용에 따른 보행 동작의 운동역학적 비교 분석. 미간행 박사학위논문. 성균관대학교 대학원.
  8. 최순복(2001). 발의 불편감에 영향을 미치는 구두형태 및 보행특성. 미간행 석사학위논문, 건국대학교 대학원.
  9. Bahr, R., Lian, O., Bahr, I.A.(1997). A twofold reduction in the incidence of acute ankle sprains in volleyball after the introduction of an injury prevention program: a prospective cohort study-Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports 7, pp. 172-177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.1997.tb00135.x
  10. Cosio-Lima, L.M, Reynolds, K.L, Winter, C., Paolone, V., Jones, MT.(2003). Effects of thysioball and conventional floor exercises on early phase adaptations in back and abdominal core stability and balance in warren. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 17, pp 721-725. https://doi.org/10.1519/1533-4287(2003)017<0721:EOPACF>2.0.CO;2
  11. Hong, Y., Mao, D., Li, J. Xu, D. Q. Luk, J.(2004). Gait pattern of waking on treadmill wearing negative heel shoe. Abstract, www.staffs.ac,uk/isb-fw/abstracts/HONG_GAIT_RULL.pdf
  12. L. Stewart, J.N.A Gibson, C.E. Thomson(2007) In-shoe pressure distribution in "unstable" (MBT) shoes and flat-bottomed training shoes: A comparative study, Gait & Posture, pp. 68-651.
  13. Nigg, B. M., Ferber, R., Gormley, T.(2004). Effect of an Unstable Shoe Construction on Lower Extremity Gait Characteristics, Human Performance laboratory, University of Calgary, Canada.
  14. Nigg, B., Hintzen, S., Ferber, R.(2006). Effect of an unstable shoe construction on lower extremity gait characteristics. Clinical Biomechanics. 21(1):82-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.08.013
  15. Nigg, B. M., Stefanyshyn, D., Cole, G., & Boyer, K. (2005). Footwear research-past, present and future. Proceedings. of the 7th symposium on Footwear Biomechanics. Cleverland, OH, USA.
  16. Romkes, J., Rudmann, C., Brunner, R.(2006). Change in gait and EMG when walking with the Masai Barefoot Technique. Clinical Biomechanics. 21:75-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.08.003
  17. Scott, S. H., Winter, D. A.(1990). Internal forces at chronic running injury sites. Medicine and Science and Science in Sports and Excercise 22, pp. 357-369.
  18. Stefanyshyn, D. J., Stergiou P., Lun, V. M. Y., Meeuwisse W. H.(2006) Knee angular impulse as a predictor of patellofemoral pain in runners. American Journal of Sports Medicine. 34, pp. 1844-1851. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506288753
  19. Vernon, T., Wheat, J., Naik, R., Pettit. G.(2004). Change in gait characteristics of a normal, Healthy population due to an unstable shoe construction. Sheffileld Hallam U. UK.
  20. Waddington, G., Adams, R.D.(2004). The effect of a 5-week wobble-board exercise intervention on ability to discriminate different degrees of ankle inversion, barefoot and wearing shoes: a study in healthy elderly. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 52, pp. 573-576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52164.x
  21. Wester. J.U., Jespersen S.M., Nielsen, K.D., Neumann, L.(1996) Wobble board training after partial sprains of the lateral ligaments of the ankle: a prospective randomized study. Journal of Orthopaedic Sports and Physical Therapy 23, pp. 332-336. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1996.23.5.332
  22. Winter D.A.(1990) Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons inc.
  23. Woollacott, M., Shumway-Cook, A.(2002). Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait and Posture 16, pp. 1-14.

Cited by

  1. The Effect of Form and Hardness of Outsoles on the Motion of the Lower Extremity Joints and on Foot Pressure during Gait vol.21, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2011.21.2.223
  2. Analysis of Patented Technology for Health related Footwear vol.14, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5805/KSCI.2012.14.1.144
  3. Medial Longitudinal Arch Balanced Analysis of the Calibration vol.8, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2014.8.2.51